[PATCH v2] user32: Implement case of pointSize == 0x7fff.

[katahiromz .]

See attachment.

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?

Full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=59473

Your paranoid android.

=== wxppro (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 13)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01da"' vs 'L"Tahoma"')

=== w2003std (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 13)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01da"' vs 'L"Tahoma"')

=== wvistau64 (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-12 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01ee"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w2008s64 (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 13)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01da"' vs 'L"Tahoma"')

=== w8 (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-12 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01fa"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w8adm (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-12 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01fa"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w864 (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-12 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01fa"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-12 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01fa"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\000f"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w1064v1809_2scr (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\000f"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w1064v1809_ar (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\000f"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w1064v1809_he (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\000f"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w1064v1809_ja (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\000f"' vs 'L"Yu Gothic UI"')

=== w1064v1809_zh_CN (32 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 17)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\0011"' vs 'L"Microsoft YaHei UI"')

=== wvistau64 (64 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-12 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01ee"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w2008s64 (64 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 13)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01da"' vs 'L"Tahoma"')

=== w864 (64 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-12 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01fa"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-12 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\01fa"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===

user32:
dialog.c:2014: Test failed: dialog font lfHeight not matched (-11 vs 15)
dialog.c:2026: Test failed: dialog font lfFaceName not matched ('L"\000f"' vs 'L"Segoe UI"')

=== debian10 (build log) ===

../../../wine/dlls/user32/dialog.c:308:44: error: unknown type name ‘LOGFONT’
../../../wine/dlls/user32/dialog.c:315:12: error: request for member ‘lfHeight’ in something not a structure or union
../../../wine/dlls/user32/dialog.c:317:27: error: request for member ‘lfHeight’ in something not a structure or union
Task: The win32 build failed

=== debian10 (build log) ===

../../../wine/dlls/user32/dialog.c:308:44: error: unknown type name ‘LOGFONT’
../../../wine/dlls/user32/dialog.c:315:12: error: request for member ‘lfHeight’ in something not a structure or union
../../../wine/dlls/user32/dialog.c:317:27: error: request for member ‘lfHeight’ in something not a structure or union
Task: The wow64 build failed

[Alexandre Julliard]

"katahiromz ."  writes:
> See attachment.
>
> From 118fdea9e3250edb3b9e70574e4b8686cfcdd3fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Hirofumi Katayama 
> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 21:09:15 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH v2] user32: Implement case of pointSize == 0x7fff.
>
> If DLGTEMPLATE.pointSize == 0x7FFF, then a special
> treatment is required. That uses message box font.

This is already handled in the caller. Why do you need all this?