MSVCRT printf functions

[Aneurin Price]

I've gone over this patch again, fixed any bugs I could find, and tried 
to address the points made regarding readability. Hopefully the coding 
style should now be much improved, so could anyone who knows about such 
things give it a look over?  If there's not too much of a problem there 
I'll fix up any points made and submit to wine-patches with the 
appropriate notes.
I am still a little unsure about a couple of points; ones I can remember 
off the top of my head: probably insufficient attribution for code 
derived from file.c, since I have no idea who wrote the functions I used 
(these are specified in the copyright notice for printf.c, BTW). It's 
also pretty big; I presume it's okay to have this much in one file, but 
maybe not. Either way it can't be broken down into smaller patches since 
it's one big change.
Thanks,
Aneurin Price

[Mike McCormack]

Aneurin Price wrote:
> I've gone over this patch again, fixed any bugs I could find, and tried 
> to address the points made regarding readability. Hopefully the coding 
> style should now be much improved, so could anyone who knows about such 
> things give it a look over?

Well, it looks nicer, but it probably won't compile due to the CVS 
conflict burried inside.

Mike
> @@ -2971,6 +2864,8 @@
>    }
>    return mwc;
>  }
> +<<<<<<< file.c
> +=======
>
> /*********************************************************************
> -
> wprintf (MSVCRT.@)