kernel32 test

[Eric Pouech]

can someone run the attached test (which is an evolution of 
dlls/kernel/tests/atom.c) on a win9x box and send me back the results...

the semantics for getting an atom name with a buffer too small are so 
inconsistent on XP, I'd like to get an idea of what gives on Win9x (and even NT 
if there are some takers)
TIA