Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

[jimtabor]

Julien wrote:
> / I was very interested in comparing the implementation status of reactos

/>/ and wine. So I coded a little python script to list all the api that are
/>/ implemented in reactos AND are only stub in wine. Attached to this mail
/>/ is the list of identified functions.
/>/ 
/>/ One may note that most of these functions are in the setupapi dll. This
/>/ is particularly interesting as the setupapi code is LGPL-licenced in
/>/ Reactos (and was already part of the audit).
/
Code that originates in ReactOS will generally not be accepted into Wine 
due to that project's acceptance of developers that participate in 
"dirty" reverse engineering (ie. translating assembly code to C).

Please don't submit code from ReactOS to wine-patches.

Mike

Hi Mike,
Please do not post things like this.
Thanks,
James

LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"jimtabor"  wrote:
> Julien wrote:
> > / I was very interested in comparing the implementation status of reactos
>
> />/ and wine. So I coded a little python script to list all the api that are
> />/ implemented in reactos AND are only stub in wine. Attached to this mail
> />/ is the list of identified functions.
> />/ 
> />/ One may note that most of these functions are in the setupapi dll. This
> />/ is particularly interesting as the setupapi code is LGPL-licenced in
> />/ Reactos (and was already part of the audit).
> /
> Code that originates in ReactOS will generally not be accepted into Wine 
> due to that project's acceptance of developers that participate in 
> "dirty" reverse engineering (ie. translating assembly code to C).
>
> Please don't submit code from ReactOS to wine-patches.
>
> Mike
>
> Hi Mike,
> Please do not post things like this.

We would stop sending things like the one above, and simply quote
messages from the ros-devel's "Bye bye" thread, but unfortunately
that's no more possible: the whole thread has been very carefully
censored to remove any "questionable" parts. If you want a respectful
attitude, respect yourself and restore all the removed parts including
original message which led to the whole discussion.