Seems like a typo. Also, there's no need to print the value of an always NULL handle.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de
From: Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de
Seems like a typo. Also, there's no need to print the value of an always NULL handle.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- dlls/ntdll/tests/pipe.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/pipe.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/pipe.c index 6f26655b118..0e373dcf7ea 100644 --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/pipe.c +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/pipe.c @@ -2920,13 +2920,13 @@ static void subtest_pipe_name(const struct pipe_name_test *pnt) return; }
- ok(pipe != NULL, "expected non-NULL handle, got %p\n", client); + ok(pipe != NULL, "expected non-NULL handle\n");
client = NULL; status = NtCreateFile(&client, SYNCHRONIZE, &attr, &iosb, NULL, 0, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE, FILE_OPEN, 0, NULL, 0); ok(status == STATUS_SUCCESS, "Expected success, got %#lx\n", status); - ok(client != NULL, "expected non-NULL handle, got %p\n", client); + ok(client != NULL, "expected non-NULL handle\n"); NtClose(client);
if (pnt->no_open_name)