On Fri Sep 13 16:43:58 2024 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
Any chance we get an inline comment saying how `0x10000` was chosen?
Not sure what to say other than it's pretty arbitrary. Larger than common read sizes, to reduce the chances of having to call the callbacks multiple times, but otherwise nothing very interesting about it. Maybe it should even be a bit shorter to avoid wasting two 64k page instead of one though.