The key change is to never return STATUS_TIMEOUT, and to instead return the result of NtYieldExecution() if zero timeout was passed, or STATUS_SUCCESS otherwise.
An overview of the correct values for each combination, copied from the test commit: - Non-alertable, zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS or STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED - Non-alertable, non-zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS - Alertable, zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS, STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED, or STATUS_USER_APC - Alertable, non-zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS or STATUS_USER_APC
-- v9: ntdll: Fix the return value of NtDelayExecution.
From: William Horvath william@horvath.blog
--- dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c index 3ab89bbf361..a4d13288293 100644 --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static NTSTATUS (WINAPI *pNtCreateEvent) ( PHANDLE, ACCESS_MASK, const OBJECT_AT static NTSTATUS (WINAPI *pNtCreateKeyedEvent)( HANDLE *, ACCESS_MASK, const OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES *, ULONG ); static NTSTATUS (WINAPI *pNtCreateMutant)( HANDLE *, ACCESS_MASK, const OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES *, BOOLEAN ); static NTSTATUS (WINAPI *pNtCreateSemaphore)( HANDLE *, ACCESS_MASK, const OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES *, LONG, LONG ); +static NTSTATUS (WINAPI *pNtDelayExecution)( BOOLEAN, const LARGE_INTEGER * ); static NTSTATUS (WINAPI *pNtOpenEvent)( HANDLE *, ACCESS_MASK, const OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES * ); static NTSTATUS (WINAPI *pNtOpenKeyedEvent)( HANDLE *, ACCESS_MASK, const OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES * ); static NTSTATUS (WINAPI *pNtPulseEvent)( HANDLE, LONG * ); @@ -1030,6 +1031,116 @@ static void test_completion_port_scheduling(void) } }
+/* An overview of possible combinations and return values: + * - Non-alertable, zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS or STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED + * - Non-alertable, non-zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS + * - Alertable, zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS, STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED, or STATUS_USER_APC + * - Alertable, non-zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS or STATUS_USER_APC + * - Sleep/SleepEx don't modify LastError, no matter what + */ + +static VOID CALLBACK apc_proc( ULONG_PTR param ) +{ + InterlockedIncrement( (LONG *)param ); +} + +static void test_delayexecution(void) +{ + static const struct + { + BOOLEAN alertable; + LONGLONG timeout; + BOOLEAN queue_apc; + const char *desc; + } tests[] = + { + { FALSE, 0, FALSE, "non-alertable yield" }, + { FALSE, -10000, FALSE, "non-alertable sleep" }, + { TRUE, 0, FALSE, "alertable yield" }, + { TRUE, -10000, FALSE, "alertable sleep" }, + { TRUE, 0, TRUE, "alertable yield with APC" }, + { TRUE, -10000, TRUE, "alertable sleep with APC" }, + }; + unsigned int i, iterations; + unsigned int noyields[2] = {0, 0}; /* [0] = non-alertable, [1] = alertable */ + unsigned int apc_status_count[2] = {0, 0}; /* [0] = zero timeout, [1] = non-zero timeout */ + LARGE_INTEGER timeout; + ULONG apc_count; + NTSTATUS status; + DWORD ret; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) + { + winetest_push_context("%s", tests[i].desc); + + /* run zero-timeout tests a lot more to catch possibly flaky (but very unlikely) NO_YIELD_PERFORMED */ + iterations = tests[i].timeout ? 100 : 10000; + while (iterations--) + { + timeout.QuadPart = tests[i].timeout; + + apc_count = 0; + if (tests[i].queue_apc) + QueueUserAPC( apc_proc, GetCurrentThread(), (ULONG_PTR)&apc_count ); + + /* test NtDelayExecution */ + SetLastError( 0xdeadbeef ); + status = pNtDelayExecution( tests[i].alertable, &timeout ); + ok( GetLastError() == 0xdeadbeef, "got error %#lx.\n", GetLastError() ); + + todo_wine_if(status == STATUS_TIMEOUT) + ok( status == STATUS_SUCCESS || + (!tests[i].timeout && status == STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED) || + (tests[i].alertable && tests[i].queue_apc && status == STATUS_USER_APC), + "got status %#lx.\n", status ); + + if (status == STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED) + noyields[tests[i].alertable]++; + + /* make sure we only get APCs when we expect them */ + if (tests[i].alertable && tests[i].queue_apc) + { + if (status == STATUS_USER_APC) + apc_status_count[tests[i].timeout ? 1 : 0]++; + ok( apc_count > 0, "no APCs executed.\n" ); + } + else + ok( !apc_count, "unexpected APCs executed %ld.\n", apc_count ); + + /* test SleepEx */ + apc_count = 0; + if (tests[i].queue_apc) + QueueUserAPC( apc_proc, GetCurrentThread(), (ULONG_PTR)&apc_count ); + + SetLastError( 0xdeadbeef ); + ret = SleepEx( timeout.QuadPart ? (-timeout.QuadPart / 10000) : 0, tests[i].alertable ); + ok( GetLastError() == 0xdeadbeef, "got error %#lx.\n", GetLastError() ); + + if (!tests[i].alertable) + ok( !ret, "got %lu.\n", ret ); + else + ok( !ret || ret == WAIT_IO_COMPLETION, "got %lu.\n", ret ); + + if (tests[i].queue_apc) + ok( apc_count > 0, "no APCs executed.\n" ); + + /* test Sleep (non-alertable only) */ + if (!tests[i].alertable) + { + SetLastError( 0xdeadbeef ); + Sleep( timeout.QuadPart ? (-timeout.QuadPart / 10000) : 0 ); + ok( GetLastError() == 0xdeadbeef, "got error %#lx.\n", GetLastError() ); + } + } + winetest_pop_context(); + } + + todo_wine ok( noyields[0] > 0, "no STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED results for non-alertable yields.\n" ); + todo_wine ok( noyields[1] > 0, "no STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED results for alertable yields.\n" ); + ok( apc_status_count[0] > 0, "no STATUS_USER_APC results for alertable yields.\n" ); + ok( apc_status_count[1] > 0, "no STATUS_USER_APC results for alertable delays.\n" ); +} + START_TEST(sync) { HMODULE module = GetModuleHandleA("ntdll.dll"); @@ -1046,6 +1157,7 @@ START_TEST(sync) pNtCreateKeyedEvent = (void *)GetProcAddress(module, "NtCreateKeyedEvent"); pNtCreateMutant = (void *)GetProcAddress(module, "NtCreateMutant"); pNtCreateSemaphore = (void *)GetProcAddress(module, "NtCreateSemaphore"); + pNtDelayExecution = (void *)GetProcAddress(module, "NtDelayExecution"); pNtOpenEvent = (void *)GetProcAddress(module, "NtOpenEvent"); pNtOpenKeyedEvent = (void *)GetProcAddress(module, "NtOpenKeyedEvent"); pNtPulseEvent = (void *)GetProcAddress(module, "NtPulseEvent"); @@ -1078,4 +1190,5 @@ START_TEST(sync) test_resource(); test_tid_alert( argv ); test_completion_port_scheduling(); + test_delayexecution(); }
From: William Horvath william@horvath.blog
The key change is to never return STATUS_TIMEOUT, and to instead return the result of NtYieldExecution() if zero timeout was passed, or STATUS_SUCCESS otherwise.
An overview of the correct values for each combination, copied from the test commit: - Non-alertable, zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS or STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED - Non-alertable, non-zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS - Alertable, zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS, STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED, or STATUS_USER_APC - Alertable, non-zero timeout: STATUS_SUCCESS or STATUS_USER_APC - Sleep/SleepEx don't modify LastError, no matter what --- dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c | 3 +-- dlls/ntdll/unix/sync.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c index a4d13288293..0723da28225 100644 --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c @@ -1088,7 +1088,6 @@ static void test_delayexecution(void) status = pNtDelayExecution( tests[i].alertable, &timeout ); ok( GetLastError() == 0xdeadbeef, "got error %#lx.\n", GetLastError() );
- todo_wine_if(status == STATUS_TIMEOUT) ok( status == STATUS_SUCCESS || (!tests[i].timeout && status == STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED) || (tests[i].alertable && tests[i].queue_apc && status == STATUS_USER_APC), @@ -1135,7 +1134,7 @@ static void test_delayexecution(void) winetest_pop_context(); }
- todo_wine ok( noyields[0] > 0, "no STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED results for non-alertable yields.\n" ); + ok( noyields[0] > 0, "no STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED results for non-alertable yields.\n" ); todo_wine ok( noyields[1] > 0, "no STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED results for alertable yields.\n" ); ok( apc_status_count[0] > 0, "no STATUS_USER_APC results for alertable yields.\n" ); ok( apc_status_count[1] > 0, "no STATUS_USER_APC results for alertable delays.\n" ); diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/unix/sync.c b/dlls/ntdll/unix/sync.c index 0ee16b360b3..2b01aaf83b8 100644 --- a/dlls/ntdll/unix/sync.c +++ b/dlls/ntdll/unix/sync.c @@ -1641,8 +1641,17 @@ NTSTATUS WINAPI NtYieldExecution(void) */ NTSTATUS WINAPI NtDelayExecution( BOOLEAN alertable, const LARGE_INTEGER *timeout ) { + unsigned int status = STATUS_SUCCESS; + /* if alertable, we need to query the server */ - if (alertable) return server_wait( NULL, 0, SELECT_INTERRUPTIBLE | SELECT_ALERTABLE, timeout ); + if (alertable) + { + /* Since server_wait will result in an unconditional implicit yield, + we never return STATUS_NO_YIELD_PERFORMED */ + if ((status = server_wait( NULL, 0, SELECT_INTERRUPTIBLE | SELECT_ALERTABLE, timeout )) == STATUS_TIMEOUT) + status = STATUS_SUCCESS; + return status; + }
if (!timeout || timeout->QuadPart == TIMEOUT_INFINITE) /* sleep forever */ { @@ -1659,9 +1668,10 @@ NTSTATUS WINAPI NtDelayExecution( BOOLEAN alertable, const LARGE_INTEGER *timeou when = now.QuadPart - when; }
- /* Note that we yield after establishing the desired timeout */ - NtYieldExecution(); - if (!when) return STATUS_SUCCESS; + /* Note that we yield after establishing the desired timeout, but + we only care about the result of the yield for zero timeouts */ + status = NtYieldExecution(); + if (!when) return status;
for (;;) {
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details:
The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=151072
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11b (64 bit WoW report) ===
user32: input.c:4306: Test succeeded inside todo block: button_down_hwnd_todo 1: got MSG_TEST_WIN hwnd 0000000000EF00EE, msg WM_LBUTTONDOWN, wparam 0x1, lparam 0x320032
On Mon Jan 27 15:50:53 2025 +0000, William Horvath wrote:
changed this line in [version 9 of the diff](/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7169/diffs?diff_id=154246&start_sha=d91cfdc36972b814c149bb8bf8075eea687a8eb6#6a31f4cf2c4d24038e67fe3417ad92c8f1f6cfdc_1651_1651)
sure, agreed.
Paul Gofman (@gofman) commented about dlls/ntdll/tests/sync.c:
- };
- unsigned int i, iterations;
- unsigned int noyields[2] = {0, 0}; /* [0] = non-alertable, [1] = alertable */
- unsigned int apc_status_count[2] = {0, 0}; /* [0] = zero timeout, [1] = non-zero timeout */
- LARGE_INTEGER timeout;
- ULONG apc_count;
- NTSTATUS status;
- DWORD ret;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++)
- {
winetest_push_context("%s", tests[i].desc);/* run zero-timeout tests a lot more to catch possibly flaky (but very unlikely) NO_YIELD_PERFORMED */iterations = tests[i].timeout ? 100 : 10000;while (iterations--)
This is actually a very long time for test. Mind that by default on Windows 1ms sleep will me 16ms sleep, so 100 times is 160ms. One potential thing to do is to break early once you encountered the status (instead of count arrays which you don't probably need anyway), but I still suggest to make just the one time test which will allow either status. It is clear enough for documentation, and in the present form it is still flaky, such things tend to break going forward. Your test in initial form wasn't a waste, it provided the evidence that that status indeed happens, but we probably don't have to keep this proof if it is flaky.
On Mon Jan 27 16:03:34 2025 +0000, Paul Gofman wrote:
This is actually a very long time for test. Mind that by default on Windows 1ms sleep will me 16ms sleep, so 100 times is 160ms. One potential thing to do is to break early once you encountered the status (instead of count arrays which you don't probably need anyway), but I still suggest to make just the one time test which will allow either status. It is clear enough for documentation, and in the present form it is still flaky, such things tend to break going forward. Your test in initial form wasn't a waste, it provided the evidence that that status indeed happens, but we probably don't have to keep this proof if it is flaky.
Sorry, 1600ms. But even 160ms of total test run time would be way too expensive.
-
Marvin -
Paul Gofman (＠gofman) -
William Horvath
-
William Horvath (＠whrvth)