On Fri Sep 13 17:35:55 2024 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
Not sure what to say other than it's pretty arbitrary. Larger than common read sizes, to reduce the chances of having to call the callbacks multiple times, but otherwise nothing very interesting about it. Maybe it should even be a bit shorter to avoid wasting two 64k page instead of one though.
Right, guess it's something to test and optimise once all the code is in. Thanks