On Wed Jul 17 17:12:01 2024 +0000, Tim Clem wrote:
Filing a bug is probably the right thing to do. I don't know offhand who would know best - I'm not very familiar with that area myself. In ntdll/unix/virtual.c, the address space limit is hardcoded to 0x7fffffff0000 for x86_64, but on ARM it looks like we try to detect it (see `get_host_addr_space_limit`). For the bug, it would be interesting to attach a +virtual log, so we can see what `get_host_addr_space_limit` returned.
The issue I am having is when fully emulating x86_64 wine on arm64 using the likes of box64/fex/qemu. So the hardcode makes sense why the problem is happening. Thanks for the info, I'll look into using `get_host_addr_space_limit` for all architectures.