From: Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru --- dlls/netapi32/netapi32.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ dlls/netapi32/netapi32.spec | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dlls/netapi32/netapi32.c b/dlls/netapi32/netapi32.c index e28c1d5887f..07f23e4bf93 100644 --- a/dlls/netapi32/netapi32.c +++ b/dlls/netapi32/netapi32.c @@ -2303,6 +2303,30 @@ DWORD WINAPI DsRoleGetPrimaryDomainInformation( return ret; }
+DWORD WINAPI DsGetDcOpenA(LPCSTR domain, ULONG flags, LPCSTR site, + GUID *domain_guid, LPCSTR forest, ULONG dc_flags, PHANDLE context) +{ + FIXME("(%s, %08lx, %s, %s, %s, %08lx, %p)\n", debugstr_a(domain), + flags, debugstr_a(site), wine_dbgstr_guid(domain_guid), + debugstr_a(forest), dc_flags, context); + + *context = NULL; + + return ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; +} + +DWORD WINAPI DsGetDcOpenW(LPCWSTR domain, ULONG flags, LPCWSTR site, + GUID *domain_guid, LPCWSTR forest, ULONG dc_flags, PHANDLE context) +{ + FIXME("(%s, %08lx, %s, %s, %s, %08lx, %p)\n", debugstr_w(domain), + flags, debugstr_w(site), wine_dbgstr_guid(domain_guid), + debugstr_w(forest), dc_flags, context); + + *context = NULL; + + return ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; +} + /************************************************************ * NetLocalGroupAdd (NETAPI32.@) */ diff --git a/dlls/netapi32/netapi32.spec b/dlls/netapi32/netapi32.spec index f5fd4444de8..cfe5aff09e2 100644 --- a/dlls/netapi32/netapi32.spec +++ b/dlls/netapi32/netapi32.spec @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ @ stdcall DsGetDcNameA(str str ptr str long ptr) @ stdcall DsGetDcNameW(wstr wstr ptr wstr long ptr) @ stub DsGetDcNext -@ stub DsGetDcOpen +@ stdcall DsGetDcOpenA(str long str ptr str long ptr) +@ stdcall DsGetDcOpenW(wstr long wstr ptr wstr long ptr) @ stub DsGetDcSiteCoverage @ stub DsGetForestTrustInformationW @ stdcall DsGetSiteNameA(str ptr)
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details:
The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=151169
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11b (64 bit WoW report) ===
user32: msg.c:6995: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 3: the winevent_hook 0x8005 was expected, but got hook 0x0005 instead msg.c:6995: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 3: the winevent_hook 0x8005 was expected, but got winevent_hook 0x0003 instead msg.c:6995: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 3: the winevent_hook 0x8005 was expected, but got msg 0x030f instead msg.c:6995: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 3: the winevent_hook 0x8005 was expected, but got msg 0x001c instead msg.c:6995: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 3: the winevent_hook 0x8005 was expected, but got msg 0x0086 instead msg.c:6995: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 3: the winevent_hook 0x8005 was expected, but got msg 0x0006 instead msg.c:6995: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 3: the winevent_hook 0x8005 was expected, but got hook 0x0009 instead