Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nc-winbase-lppro...
-- v7: include: Name parameters in LPPROGRESS_ROUTINE typedef
From: Ostap Brehin osbre@protonmail.com
include: Name parameters in LPPROGRESS_ROUTINE typedef --- include/winbase.h | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/winbase.h b/include/winbase.h index fe143cc7a61..5c7a1901a78 100644 --- a/include/winbase.h +++ b/include/winbase.h @@ -1035,9 +1035,10 @@ typedef struct _WIN32_FILE_ATTRIBUTES_DATA { * This one seems to be a Win32 only definition. It also is defined with * WINAPI instead of CALLBACK in the windows headers. */ -typedef DWORD (CALLBACK *LPPROGRESS_ROUTINE)(LARGE_INTEGER, LARGE_INTEGER, LARGE_INTEGER, - LARGE_INTEGER, DWORD, DWORD, HANDLE, - HANDLE, LPVOID); +typedef DWORD (CALLBACK *LPPROGRESS_ROUTINE)(LARGE_INTEGER total_file_size, + LARGE_INTEGER total_bytes_transferred, LARGE_INTEGER stream_size, + LARGE_INTEGER stream_bytes_transferred, DWORD stream_number, + DWORD callback_reason, HANDLE source_file, HANDLE destination_file, void *user_data);
typedef DWORD (WINAPI *APPLICATION_RECOVERY_CALLBACK)(PVOID);
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details:
The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=148176
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11b (64 bit WoW report) ===
ddraw: ddraw2.c:3814: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(640,480), got (0,0)-(1024,768). ddraw2.c:3839: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(640,480), got (0,0)-(1024,768).