[PATCH 0/1] MR6819: include: Fix WM_IME_KEY* typo.

[Marc-Aurel Zent (＠mzent)]

As far as I can tell, ime.h is only included by the x11 keyboard driver and `WM_IMEKEYDOWN` and `WM_IMEKEYUP` are not used there, so this change should only bring the naming convention in line with what is already in winuser and MSDN.

[PATCH 1/1] include: Fix WM_IME_KEY* typo.

[Marc-Aurel Zent]

From: Marc-Aurel Zent

---
 include/ime.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/ime.h b/include/ime.h
index 9312e37bc15..4b535d6c72e 100644
--- a/include/ime.h
+++ b/include/ime.h
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ typedef struct tagIMESTRUCT {
 #define WM_CONVERTRESULT 0x010B
 #define WM_INTERIM 0x010C

-#define WM_IMEKEYDOWN 0x290
-#define WM_IMEKEYUP 0x291
+#define WM_IME_KEYDOWN 0x290
+#define WM_IME_KEYUP 0x291

typedef struct tagUNDETERMINESTRUCT {
     DWORD dwSize;

[PATCH 1/1] include: Fix WM_IME_KEY* typo.

[Marvin]

Hi,

It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.

The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how
to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details:

The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=149673

Your paranoid android.

=== debian11b (64 bit WoW report) ===

ddraw:
ddraw4.c:3978: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(1024,768), got (-32000,-32000)-(-31840,-31969).
ddraw4.c:4050: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(640,480), got (-32000,-32000)-(-31840,-31969).
ddraw4.c:4075: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(640,480), got (-32000,-32000)-(-31840,-31969).

[PATCH 0/1] MR6819: Draft: include: Fix WM_IME_KEY* typo.

[Marc-Aurel Zent (＠mzent)]

Ah, this does double define `WM_IME_KEYDOWN` and `WM_IME_KEYUP` in the x11 driver then... Will try to see if there is a better solution for this