Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] MR1899: kernel32/tests: Call newer functions not on Windows XP or 2003 via function addresses (process)

[Alexandre Julliard (＠julliard)]

> I don't see the maintenance cost or burden as high, nor do I mind monitoring this, if that's a concern.

Seeing the number of patches you had to write (and will have to continue to write on an ongoing basis), I'd say the cost is significant.

What's the upside? What behavior do you need to test on XP, and why?