Re: Wineconf 2007 survey

[Jeremy White]

We've got 24 so far; 12 for Zurich, 9 for Amsterdam, and 3 for Bratislava.

I'm attaching the raw results, as there are comments in there.

The summary of the comments is that either Amsterdam or Zurich works equally well
for most folks; some people only like the LA option, and Marcus
is concerned that the LA option won't really work out.

Is that enough?

Cheers,

Jeremy

Dan Kegel wrote:
> Did you get enough responses?   Seems like a mention on wine-devel
> might be in order.
>
> On 4/30/07, Jeremy White  wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Well, I was hoping that out of the chatter following my last email,
> > we'd have consenus about the location.
> >
> > However, the overwhelming silence didn't really help :-/.  So, to try to
> > help
> > get some forward momentum, I thought we should turn to a survey
> > again - then we'd just pick the most popular spot.
> >
> > To that end, if you could visit this page:
> >
> > http://www.winehq.org/site/wineconf/survey
> >
> > and enter your preference, I'd appreciate it.  Should take only
> > a sec (exactly 1 question, although your name and email are nice too
> > :-/).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> > wineconf mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wineconf

Amsterdam	Jeremy Newman	[e-mail]	Sweet!	
Zurich	Jeremy White	[e-mail]	Let's hang with Google...	
Zurich	Kai Blin	[e-mail]	Do we have a date for this yet? September is kind of busy for me. I'm on vacation for two weeks and on a Samba conference after that. :/	
Amsterdam	Roderick Colenbrander	[e-mail]	I'm from the Netherlands as well. I'm studying at the University of Twente. At the campus of my university we have good facilities (both for the conference as well as sleeping). This might be an option. Roderick	
Bratislava	Robert Shearman	[e-mail]	I'm excited for Martin to show us his local bar. Zurich is also an attractive option.	
Amsterdam	Huw Davies	[e-mail]		
Zurich	Jonathan Ernst	[e-mail]		
Zurich	Brian Vincent	[e-mail]	My plans to attend will be completely contingent on dates since my fiance is probably not going to want to go to Wineconf for a honeymoon. I voted Zurich ONLY because there's a possibility of a satellite site.  Otherwise I would have voted for Amsterdam.	
Zurich	Steven Edwards	[e-mail]	My choice order is 1,3,2	
Zurich	Eric Pouech	[e-mail]	Either Zurich or Amsterdam or Utrecht are fine to me (I checked Netherlands because travel is slighty shorter).	
Zurich	James Hawkins	[e-mail]	Attending the satellite in Santa Monica will be my only way to be a part of WineConf this year.	
Zurich	Hans Leidekker	[e-mail]	I'll be modest and limit my choice to Zurich and Bratislava ;) 	
Amsterdam	Michael Stefaniuc	[e-mail]	I don't mind Zurich either.	
Bratislava	Andrew Bogott	[e-mail]	(Really, all three places sound great.  Just, I've never been to Bratislava.)	
Zurich	Francois Gouget	[e-mail]		
Zurich	_Marcus_	[e-mail]	perhaps no satellite ... it is not going to work I guess	
Amsterdam	Stefan Dösinger	[e-mail]	I'd be fine with the other places too. 	
Amsterdam	Henri Verbeet	[e-mail]	Any location in the Netherlands is obviously very convenient for me, but I don't particularly mind either of the other two options either. 	
Zurich	Scott Ritchie	[e-mail]	If someone can get to Amsterdam or Utrech, they likely can get to Zurich.  The main selling point is the satellite site in California, though.	
Zurich	Ulrich Czekalla	[e-mail]		
Amsterdam	Paul Millar	[e-mail]	I went for Amsterdam/Netherlands just because I know a few people who live in Amsterdam: I'd be happy with any of the three.	
Amsterdam	Tom Wickline	[e-mail]	I would like for it to be held in October, six months out.. but any date at least four months out is fine with me.. Just ample time to plan and save for the trip. Cheers, Tom	
Amsterdam	Martin Pilka	[e-mail]	I vote for Amsterdam, since I have been never there :) Anyway, I would go to any of those 3 places 	
Zurich	Dan Kegel	[e-mail]