Re: Agenda

[Alexandre Julliard]

Dan Kegel  writes:
> Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > Mike Hearn wrote:
> > > A quick talk/demo of SVK (distributed version control) might be
> > > interesting for the people who write a *lot* of patches.
> >
> > A bit of a hot topic, isn't it? It boils down to such questions as
> > "should the current revision control mechanism be replaced"?
>
> Hey, as long as we're on touchy subjects, how about using
> bitkeeper?   Oh, wait, Alexandre nixed that a long time
> ago, according to
> http://www.kerneltraffic.org/wine/wn20000515_43_print.html#2
> Nevermind.

Well, as far as I'm concerned, if we switch to a better system it will
be arch and not subversion (and certainly not bitkeeper). But yes that
would be a good topic for a (lively ;-) discussion.