October 2005 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 3432] Installation failure

by Wine Bugs

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3432 dank(a)kegel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://www.xforce- |http://www.xforce-online.de |online.de/index.php | Keywords| |download ------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2005-01-10 00:13 ------- The game can be downloaded from http://www.xforce-online.de/download/xforce-setup.exe -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Oct. 1, 2005

[Bug 461] Implement processing for SystemParametersInfo actions with id>=115

by Wine Bugs

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 infyquest(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From infyquest(a)gmail.com 2005-30-09 23:48 ------- closing this as it an implementation discussion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Oct. 1, 2005

[Bug 2201] wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0013), starting debugger... WineDbg starting on pid e Can't find file for ELF 'wine-kthread' ((nil))WineDbg starting on pid eCan't find file for ELF 'wine-kthread' ((nil))

by Wine Bugs

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2201 infyquest(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |ABANDONED ------- Additional Comments From infyquest(a)gmail.com 2005-30-09 23:44 ------- closing as abandoned , please re-open it if you have got any more issues -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Oct. 1, 2005

[Bug 3358] application fails to start because of SSHDRV82.sys (probably)

by Wine Bugs

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3358 ------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2005-30-09 22:31 ------- HAL.DLL & NTOSKRNL.EXE are the two major pieces of the windows NT+ kernel. Even if you stub HAL.DLL (it's easy all it probably imports are a SpinLock functions) there are still no way this can work on Wine. Because it's missing completely kernel level environment. You best bet is to use no-cd patches for your application. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Oct. 1, 2005

[Bug 2398] Application interface (LightWave 3D) completely unusable

by Wine Bugs

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2398 ------- Additional Comments From phil(a)ldex.terica.net 2005-30-09 21:50 ------- The problem is that : a) The previous version worked for this app and potentially many others before the change. The current version doesn't and there is no workaround/fix except downgrading Wine. That kind of breakage would put off a good number of people from using wine for any kind of development purpose. It would have been better to retain the choice until bugs in the new code were hammered out (such as this one). If I were a commercial vendor looking at something like Winelib for porting an application, I suspect I would be less than encouraged by this all-or-nothing approach to evolving the system. I don't dispute that many other apps have seen their behaviour improve with the change - I'm simply suggesting that having two systems side-by-side would be a better option at the moment. Once this and other issues have been resolved in the new code, the old code could be removed. b) The old working version of Wine is not packaged for current distributions. The user is left with a choice of attempting to install a package for an older distribution (potentially also conflicting with any newer version of wine that they care to install) or with compiling from source. That's not particularly friendly and those users coming from Windows who are determined enough to go this far will be few and far between (noting that Windows folks are not generally disposed to filing bug reports following years of being ignored by many vendors). If there is no technical way of having both systems implemented in Wine (with the old system being chosen by a command line switch or environment variable), then what about having the last-known-good version of Wine available for current distributions (and being able to be side-installed with the current version of Wine)? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Oct. 1, 2005

[Bug 3416] wineprefixcreate crashes system

by Wine Bugs

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3416 dank(a)kegel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2005-30-09 21:02 ------- OK, good luck with the Fedora bug! Thanks for clarifying your remark about documentation. Yes, Wine needs better doc before the 0.9 release! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Oct. 1, 2005