September 2009 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #48 from Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> 2009-09-30 18:32:39 --- (In reply to comment #47) > > the APIC identification is failing under Wine. > > I am unclear as to what you mean by this. The APIC is returned in bits > 31...24 of EBX after issuing a CPUID 1 instruction. Wine/*nix can not affect > the operation of the CPUID instruction, it's just like any other unprivileged > x86 instruction. Okay. I didn't remember that that's how you were doing it. > Have you run SIV on your system ? Does the failure get shown on your system > please ? I would like to get an idea if this is just a ubuntu Linux issue. To > actually know it works at all with Wine would be a valuable input. Yes, and it fails in the same way here, if I understand the program well enough. (I confess to finding SIV pretty confusing.) Nevertheless, the sched_setaffinity calls succeed. (I instrumented my own wineserver to verify it.) So I'm leaning toward this being a kernel bug. Once we ask the kernel to schedule a thread on a different CPU, and the kernel says, "righto," there's nothing more we can do, is there? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #47 from ray(a)pobox.co.uk 2009-09-30 18:25:53 --- (In reply to comment #46) > the APIC identification is failing under Wine. I am unclear as to what you mean by this. The APIC is returned in bits 31...24 of EBX after issuing a CPUID 1 instruction. Wine/*nix can not affect the operation of the CPUID instruction, it's just like any other unprivileged x86 instruction. Have you run SIV on your system ? Does the failure get shown on your system please ? I would like to get an idea if this is just a ubuntu Linux issue. To actually know it works at all with Wine would be a valuable input. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 15301] Biliardo 2 installer terminates on launch

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15301 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Zaroyko <jeffz(a)jeffz.name> 2009-09-30 18:15:12 --- confirming still present in 1.1.30 The message which pops up: 0009:Call user32.MessageBoxA(00010032,00565540 "Invalid character in the tag name. Line 1, position 102.",00561d40 "Error",00012010) ret=00414f75 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #46 from Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> 2009-09-30 18:04:27 --- (In reply to comment #45) > The SIV APIC-based CPU identification works on real Windows systems as shown by > http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=23856 but not on Wine. What do I need > to do to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that this is a Wine/*nix issue ? You already have. My point is, this is either a Linux kernel bug--we're making the correct call to schedule the thread on a different CPU, and the kernel isn't honoring that request--or the APIC identification is failing under Wine. If the former is true, you'd need to take this up with the Linux folks. If the latter is true, it's a different bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 20184] eXperience112 don`t work

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20184 knan-wine(a)anduin.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |knan-wine(a)anduin.net -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 20184] eXperience112 don`t work

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20184 --- Comment #2 from knan-wine(a)anduin.net 2009-09-30 18:02:08 --- Created an attachment (id=23861) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=23861) implement DirectDrawEnumerateExW Try this patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #45 from ray(a)pobox.co.uk 2009-09-30 17:57:04 --- (In reply to comment #44) > That sounds like either the Linux kernel isn't scheduling on the thread you're > asking it to, or that the APIC-based CPU identification isn't doing what you > want. The SIV APIC-based CPU identification works on real Windows systems as shown by http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=23856 but not on Wine. What do I need to do to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that this is a Wine/*nix issue ? Have you run SIV on your system ? Does the failure get shown on your system please ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #44 from Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> 2009-09-30 17:40:51 --- That sounds like either the Linux kernel isn't scheduling on the thread you're asking it to, or that the APIC-based CPU identification isn't doing what you want. I compiled and ran the test program here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/10/578 and it reported 0, which indicates that after calling sched_setaffinity, sched_getcpu reports the same CPU as sched_setaffinity requested. Thus, either sched_getcpu lying, or sched_setaffinity is doing what I want. If it's lying, it's a Linux kernel bug. Otherwise, the CPU identification is flawed under Wine, and likely a Wine bug. In either case, _this_ bug will be fixed once my latest patch is committed, except on >= 32 CPU systems.. but I'm willing to leave that one alone until someone actually needs support for those. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 20223] program error

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20223 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download Component|-unknown |msxml3 --- Comment #3 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-09-30 17:31:52 --- Please attach a +msxml trace. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #43 from ray(a)pobox.co.uk 2009-09-30 17:31:07 --- (In reply to comment #40) > > I sent an improved patch that fixes this: > > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/079213.html > I tried it. No changes since 'test case 3'. But I don't know if there are > should be any. The patch is to detect programs trying to set in invalid thread affinity mask. It should have no effect of the operation of SIV as SIV does not do this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009