September 2009 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 19963] GetSystemTimeAdjustment() should return 10000000 / sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK)

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19963 --- Comment #7 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-09-30 17:30:59 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > I didn't see a patch from Ray, so I went ahead and sent one: > > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/079207.html > > Thank you. I don't know how to generate patches ! http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 20109] httprecon 7.3 gets wrong data in case of a invalid http response

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20109 knan-wine(a)anduin.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|httprecon 7.3 crashes on |httprecon 7.3 gets wrong |invalid http response |data in case of a invalid | |http response -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19963] GetSystemTimeAdjustment() should return 10000000 / sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK)

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19963 --- Comment #6 from ray(a)pobox.co.uk 2009-09-30 17:26:34 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I didn't see a patch from Ray, so I went ahead and sent one: > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/079207.html Thank you. I don't know how to generate patches ! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 20109] httprecon 7.3 crashes on invalid http response

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20109 knan-wine(a)anduin.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |testcase --- Comment #4 from knan-wine(a)anduin.net 2009-09-30 17:24:38 --- Testcase in git now. The accompanying one-liner fixed the crash, the application now merely gets no data in return. Which is still wrong, since that's test data the app depends on, but better. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #42 from ray(a)pobox.co.uk 2009-09-30 17:17:07 --- (In reply to comment #39) > Okay, that helps, thanks. Ray, how is that time calculated? Are the incorrect > values related to bug 19960? This problem is nothing to do with CPU times. SIV 4.01 and later work around that bug anyway. The problem is that the threads are not being run on the CPU they set affinity to: What the [Test APIC] page is doing is checking that the APIC of the CPU it had set affinity to is as expected. The actual code is a loop that does: if( cib->dkc ) // CPU Switching Mode ? { if( ( cpo += 1 ) == smb->cpu + smb->log_cpus ) { cpo = smb->cpu; // cycle round all CPUs } cpu_ssa_set( cth, cpo->ssa ); // switch to another cpu_ssa_set( cth, cpu->ssa ); // and back to my CPU } else // no, so wait a while { ULONG volatile dly; for( dly = 0; dly < 3000; dly++ ) {} // so rate is similar } if( cpu->apic == cpu_get_apic( smb ) ) // APIC correct ? { InterlockedIncrement( &cib->gar ); // Good APIC Rate } else { InterlockedIncrement( &cib->bac ); // Bad APIC Count } cpu_ssa_set() is a wrapper for SetThreadAffinityMask() cpu_get_apic() reads the APIC of the curent CPU As soon as the returned APIC is not as expected then FAIL is reported. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 20222] OLEPictureImpl_SaveAsFile hacked stub

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20222 --- Comment #3 from dolcevita(a)supereva.it 2009-09-30 17:14:29 --- Hi, thankyou for your response, I'll try your suggestion. More: what do you mean with "this"? My vb exe project file? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #41 from ray(a)pobox.co.uk 2009-09-30 17:14:20 --- (In reply to comment #38) > Steps to reproduce: > 1) Download SIV: http://rh-software.com/downloads/siv_beta.zip > 2) Extract it at any location > 3) Run it with 'wine siv' > 4) Right click on tray icon \ Machine \ CPU Usage > 5) Press 'Test APIC' button at right of buttons row > 6) Press 'Start' button > 7) Now play with checkboxes at bottom of the window. Each pair of checkboxes > should affect corresponding CPU graph only The http://rh-software.com/downloads/siv_beta.zip should not have been posted on this public board. Can it be removed ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #40 from Boris <bstriker(a)ya.ru> 2009-09-30 17:11:28 --- > I sent an improved patch that fixes this: > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/079213.html I tried it. No changes since 'test case 3'. But I don't know if there are should be any. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #39 from Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> 2009-09-30 17:04:27 --- Okay, that helps, thanks. Ray, how is that time calculated? Are the incorrect values related to bug 19960? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009

[Bug 19982] SetThreadAffinityMask() seems not to work correctly

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19982 --- Comment #38 from Boris <bstriker(a)ya.ru> 2009-09-30 17:00:27 --- Steps to reproduce: 1) Download SIV: http://rh-software.com/downloads/siv_beta.zip 2) Extract it at any location 3) Run it with 'wine siv' 4) Right click on tray icon \ Machine \ CPU Usage 5) Press 'Test APIC' button at right of buttons row 6) Press 'Start' button 7) Now play with checkboxes at bottom of the window. Each pair of checkboxes should affect corresponding CPU graph only -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Sept. 30, 2009