February 2011 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 6167] wine mailing-list <-> usenet gateway non-functional?

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6167 --- Comment #5 from André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> 2011-02-28 09:26:04 CST --- Thx Jeremy, So we should remove the rest of the mentions/links and maybe even delete the usenet group(if possible)? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 6167] wine mailing-list <-> usenet gateway non-functional?

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6167 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com> 2011-02-28 09:20:52 CST --- I agree. This has never worked right and is no longer worth the effort to maintain the link. I have committed the patch to remove the link to the usenet groups. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 26267] EyeQ

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26267 André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://www.eyeqadvantage.c | |om/index.cfm?&CFID=63380&CF | |TOKEN=39465337 CC| |nerv(a)dawncrow.de Component|programs |-unknown --- Comment #1 from André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> 2011-02-28 09:12:02 CST --- Please attach a console log (see FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 26229] FEAR: waterplane rendering triggers SW fallback in mesa

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26229 --- Comment #6 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-28 08:32:15 CST --- (In reply to comment #5) > So what does the Windows driver do to work around this blitter limit? Native D3D doesn't need that blit at all. It's only needed due to not being able to share the depth buffer between application FBs and the system FB in GL. One way to avoid it in GL would be to do all rendering offscreen and only blitting the result to the framebuffer, but I think this is something the hardware should be able to do. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 14717] resampled sound is horrible

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14717 --- Comment #156 from Raymond <superquad.vortex2(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-28 08:22:03 CST --- (In reply to comment #145) > OK, so let me reject the patch until further debugging. > > > Task for Raymond: test all his sound cards with both alsa and oss without the > patch, but with the HKCU/Software/Wine/DirectSound/MaxShadowSize set to "0". > This is a prerequisite for my development of a replacement patch series, as it > will remove this registry setting. Your patch actually make wineoss (hardware acceleration) unusable , set Maxshadowsize=0 does not help too however set resample quality to 0 or 1 seem improve that situation a little bit but it still not stable than the version since the quality become worse when using WINEDEBUG=+dsound Both sound card support 11025, 22050 and 44100 Hz, and don't need any resampling when playing 44100Hz stereo s16 seem like resampler use too much CPU since wineoss driver use a period size lower than winealsa for the same sound card -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 26229] FEAR: waterplane rendering triggers SW fallback in mesa

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26229 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Jakobi <liquid.acid(a)gmx.net> 2011-02-28 08:13:04 CST --- (In reply to comment #4) > R600+ hardware should certainly be able to do it, the Gallium case looks more > like not yet implemented functionality than a fundamental limitation to me. Hmm, but isn't an Intel Arrandale also a DX10-capable GPU? I don't have a native Windows installation on this system here, but I doubt that I get such a fallback when running the game natively on Windows. Furthermore FEAR is DX9-based, so its hardware demand isn't that high. It just looks fishy to me that some DX9 game is triggering a fallback on a DX10-level GPU where the developers tell me that this is a blitter hardware limitation. So what does the Windows driver do to work around this blitter limit? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 14717] resampled sound is horrible

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14717 --- Comment #155 from Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-28 07:28:24 CST --- Valid remark. I'd also prefer the math to be converted to fixed-point. And although I could not write a test that fails, I am still waiting for confirmation that the patch has been tested with apps and that the logic is correct both for resampleinmixer == true and resampleinmixer == false. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 421] Implement a DIB engine

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421 Lockywolf <lockywolf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lockywolf(a)gmail.com --- Comment #406 from Lockywolf <lockywolf(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-28 07:25:11 CST --- I have a problem, similar to the autoconf one. I have ubuntu 10.10 x86_64, wine 1.3.14 I followed the instructions from http://wiki.winehq.org/WineOn64bit Ubuntu way sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa sudo apt-get build-dep wine1.3 then I applied patches (no warnings) autoconf, configure, make - passed okay. but when i try to run a program - i receive the annoying WINEDIB=on /opt/winedib/bin/winecfg err:driver:Load_Dib_Driver Couldn't load DIB Engine err:driver:Load_Dib_Driver Couldn't load DIB Engine err:driver:Load_Dib_Driver Couldn't load DIB Engine err:driver:Load_Dib_Driver Couldn't load DIB Engine Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 14717] resampled sound is horrible

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14717 --- Comment #154 from Raymond <superquad.vortex2(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-28 07:22:20 CST --- (In reply to comment #151) . > > As for the acceptable tradeoffs in terms of CPU/latency/quality, I think they > need to be discussed, According top , CPU usage with wine-1.3.14 when using foobar2000 is about 4% , and after apply your patch foobar2000 use more than 9% even when playing 44100Hz S16 stereo Look at the patch 0001, even if the sound card support the sample rate, your patch add 44100 x ( signed integer in to double , double to signed integer ) + a lot of overhead per second -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011

[Bug 26264] Tanktics won't start

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26264 --- Comment #7 from André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> 2011-02-28 06:55:13 CST --- Did the reported Windows Version in winecfg changed between the too logs? Can you please provide a WINEDEBUG=int,seh,relay log? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

Feb. 28, 2011