November 2016 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 40800] Montezuma's Return crash on startup.

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40800 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- Since I was asked privately about the details here is a part of my answer that may be useful for an interested person: --- For an explanation and more details please have a look at the following comment: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36023#c2 "Montezuma's Return" contains exactly the same snippet of code listed in the comment above. It looks like that the game is also protected by SafeDisc 1.x version which uses the 'sidt' trick under win9x. --- -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 41646] New: crash when I Start the software MTAE

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41646 Bug ID: 41646 Summary: crash when I Start the software MTAE Product: Wine-staging Version: 1.9.22 Hardware: aarch64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: p.lemonnier1(a)free.fr CC: erich.e.hoover(a)wine-staging.com, michael(a)fds-team.de, sebastian(a)fds-team.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 56021 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=56021 error file to attach to report Bug I have alway the same crashe when I try to start a professional software edited by the companie MTAE The installation is correct but I can't start the program It is the only professional software that dosen' t work with wine Many Many Many Thanks for your works that is extraordinary -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 33785] Invisible graphics elements in Patrimonium adventure game

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33785 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |winetest(a)luukku.com --- Comment #4 from winetest(a)luukku.com --- Still valid wine 1.9.22-git and staging 1.9.22. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 41642] S3CC921 programmer app needs ntoskrnl.exe.KeSetTimerEx

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41642 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |ntoskrnl -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 41642] S3CC921 programmer app needs ntoskrnl.exe.KeSetTimerEx

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41642 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|critical |normal Summary|Аварийное закрытие |S3CC921 programmer app |программатора S3CC921 |needs | |ntoskrnl.exe.KeSetTimerEx CC| |austinenglish(a)gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Please use English on bugzilla and don't paste large logs, attach them instead. Does this have a demo/download? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 40800] Montezuma's Return crash on startup.

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40800 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- (In reply to Dmitry Timoshkov from comment #4) > The application contains a custom imports resolver which gets called at > the start of the execution. Since the IAT (the imports table) has been > already processed by the PE loader custom imports resolver tries to access > the addresses calculated from the PE import thunks and that leads to an > access violation because the relative virtual addresses there have been > already replaced by real addresses of the imported APIs. > > There is an interesting detail about the process: the application uses > ReadProcessMemory() in order to read the IAT before resolving its contents > (instead of a straight memcpy() or accessing the IAT directly in memory), > perhaps win9x returns original mapped PE file contents in that case, making > this technique work. > > Probably it's possible to add a hack to ReadProcessMemory() to read > the mapped file contents in order to emulate win9x behaviour, but I'd > suggest to try writing a simple test app to confirm my theory first. I've set up windows 98 in a virtualbox (a challenge these days) and ran there a test application that dumps the IAT that was read either directly or using ReadProcessMemory(). The test proved that my guess was wrong. With the debugger and another test application I managed to figure out real differences between win9x and NT PE loaders: win9x modifies the TimeDateStamp and ForwarderChain in the IAT, while NT (and Wine) leave them intact. Simple patch that sets these fields to 0xffffffff (meaning there is no forwards) makes the application's custom PE imports resolver work. However now the app crashes after it fetches the IDT (using sidt instruction) and tries to patch it with its own data. I don't see how this could be solved. Probably a WONTFIX. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 41625] Star Trek Online

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41625 --- Comment #8 from charlie.boothe(a)warriorlife.net --- Does anyone know what the problem is? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 41645] New: recursive invokation of __clone+0x6d() in libc.so.6 ( 0x00000000) in start_thread+0xe4() in libpthread.so.0 (0x0608f428)

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41645 Bug ID: 41645 Summary: recursive invokation of __clone+0x6d() in libc.so.6 (0x00000000) in start_thread+0xe4() in libpthread.so.0 (0x0608f428) Product: Wine Version: 1.9.22 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: krichter(a)posteo.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 56020 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=56020 Backtrace created by wine crash handler There seems to be a recursive invokation inside `__clone+0x6d()` in `start_thread+0xe4() in libpthread.so.0 (0x0608f428)`, see attached backtrace. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 39396] "Legend of Grimrock 2" editor flickers

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39396 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimesio(a)earthlink.net --- Comment #5 from winetest(a)luukku.com --- (In reply to hans_squared from comment #4) > (In reply to winetest from comment #3) > > Final page of the conversation someone said that the editor works now with > > wine 1.8.1 without flickering, is that you? > > > > Is this bug still valid? > > The Legend of Grimrock 2 editor works perfectly in Wine 1.8.4-12.1 under > openSUSE 42.1. Then please close this bug as fixed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016

[Bug 31167] World Of Tanks ATI 6310 (fglrx) freezes

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31167 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Abandoned? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Nov. 3, 2016