June 2018 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 39218] advpack:advpack fails if privileges not high enough

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39218 --- Comment #2 from François Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> --- As far as I can tell we still care about Windows XP. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 29, 2018

[Bug 39222] mstask:task_scheduler fails if privileges not high enough

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39222 --- Comment #2 from François Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> --- As far as I can tell we still care about Windows XP. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 29, 2018

[Bug 45385] Wrong state of virtual keys after cycling windows. Usually VK_MENU, VK_SHIFT and VK_CONTROL, but every key can be affected.

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45385 --- Comment #2 from John Found <johnfound(a)asm32.info> --- I have found a workaround. At first, I am testing under XFCE. There are two options in the "Windows manager tweaks" settings applet: [ ] Activate focus stealing protection [ ] Honor ICCCM focus hint So, I have discovered that the bug manifests itself only when both settings are switched ON. Unchecking any of them makes the bug to disappear. Still it is not very clear where is the bug actually - in the code of the XFCE WM or in WINE. Any ideas about future testing/diagnostics are welcome. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 29, 2018

[Bug 45106] OOB write in gdi32

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45106 Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcus(a)jet.franken.de -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 29, 2018

[Bug 43673] GOG Galaxy 1.2.22.31 doesn't start up

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43673 zzzzzyzz(a)hacari.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zzzzzyzz(a)hacari.org -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 29, 2018

[Bug 45063] win64 / 64-bit .NET 4.0 - c0000005 from ntdll: RtlGetDaclSecurityDescriptor

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45063 zzzzzyzz(a)hacari.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zzzzzyzz(a)hacari.org -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 29, 2018

[Bug 34989] Multiple installers using Caphyon 'Advanced Installer' (AI) technology hang (Atlassian SourceTree v1.3.2, League of Legends 2013+) ( deferred type 1 custom action executed before regular type 1 custom action )

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34989 zzzzzyzz(a)hacari.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zzzzzyzz(a)hacari.org -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 29, 2018

[Bug 45391] winehq.org is distributing compiled LGPL code packages but withholding their sources

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45391 Olivier F. R. Dierick <o.dierick(a)piezo-forte.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |o.dierick(a)piezo-forte.be --- Comment #9 from Olivier F. R. Dierick <o.dierick(a)piezo-forte.be> --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #7) > I think a request to provide source packages is valid (and we could rename > the bug as such). That doesn't mean there's a license violation, however. > > What do others think? I think there is no violation of the LGPL and this bug should be marked INVALID. I agree with Michael Müller on the extents of the LGPL. The tool chain used for the making of the modified binaries is irrelevant to the LGPL license of the modified software. [1] The packages are binary archive files. They are not object code or executable. They are not a derivative work of the software they contain and are not subject to the source code requirement. As far as I can tell the LGPL makes no provision on the toolchain used to build the binaries. They can be built with any tools, even non-public proprietary ones that are available to nobody but the one who build the modified binaries. The only LGPL requirement is that the source code must be sufficient to build a binary that can replace the distributed one in term of functionality. That's all. Compile flags, optimization and such is not covered by the LGPL. Other people have to deal with the source code themselves. Since the wine source code is available and it can be used "as is" to build binaries that can be packaged in .deb files, the requirements of the LGPL are met, IMO. Only the copyright holders can act against violations of their copyrights. [2] As a wine contributor, I know that my code and any modification to it is in the source tree, and since the winehq.org packages are built from the source tree, I see no violation of the LGPL. The OP cannot invoke violation of the LGPL if he's not a copyright holder of a LGPL'd library. [1] "Which programs you used to edit the source code, or to compile it, or study it, or record it, usually makes no difference for issues concerning the licensing of that source code." https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#NonFreeTools [2] "Note that the GPL, and other copyleft licenses, are copyright licenses. This means that only the copyright holders are empowered to act against violations." https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 29, 2018

[Bug 36546] Please remove `tmpfs` special treatment in ntdll / MSI packages cannot be installed from `tmpfs`

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36546 Marcel <maco_cz(a)azet.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maco_cz(a)azet.sk -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 28, 2018

[Bug 34916] cmd:batch fails on Windows 8 and 8.1

by wine-bugs＠winehq.org

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34916 Jason Edmeades <us(a)edmeades.me.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |us(a)edmeades.me.uk Resolution|--- |FIXED Fixed by SHA1| |50cb282c8cdf7363dcc018de5b8 | |8c1da123b49d7 --- Comment #2 from Jason Edmeades <us(a)edmeades.me.uk> --- This is fixed http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/cmd.exe:batch.html shows no issues Commit 50cb282c8cdf7363dcc018de5b88c1da123b49d7 fixes the tests to tolerate the new behaviour -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

June 28, 2018