April 2024 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 56507] New: jscript memory sink

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56507 Bug ID: 56507 Summary: jscript memory sink Product: Wine Version: 9.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: jscript Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: k.kahurani(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Hello I have observed that jscript cannot handle the execution of scripts concurrently. In other words, though, this might not be the correct observation jscript doesn't release bytecode after compiling. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 2, 2024

[Bug 55859] LabView 2023.3.1 fails to install

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55859 --- Comment #22 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Alex Henrie from comment #21) > (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #20) > > (In reply to Alex Henrie from comment #19) > > > Rebase the merge request every month until it gets more attention. > > > > No, please don't do that. That wastes CI resources and doesn't help anything. > > If the MR is not updated, people will think that it has been abandoned and > that no one cares about it anymore. And if it is updated in a way that does > not rerun the tests, people will be concerned that tests that were written > after the patch was written might start to fail when the patch is merged. In > my humble opinion, both of those considerations are worth more than than the > cost to the CI server, which is probably not much if the submitter waits a > full month between each rebase. However, if the Wine project leadership > wants Fabian and me to stop rebasing when it's not strictly necessary, then > we'll just have to defer to your preferences. Commenting on the merge request is probably a better way to achieve that goal. > More to the point, what can we take off of your plate to give you (or > whoever the appropriate reviewer might be) time to review the patch and > identify specific action items to move it forward? I should apologize for my silence, I've mostly had the feeling that it should be possible to create a better stub. Somewhat relatedly, what this family of functions is probably supposed to do is actually functionality that I've implemented locally, but in a different place, and should probably be moved here. That would avoid the need to even stub it at all. I've mostly wanted to find the time to look into the function and see if I could figure it out in more detail, or actualize my implementation. I haven't actually said anything, partly because of this, and partly because "I think it should be possible to do better" isn't really helpful either, inasmuch as you are looking for specific action items. I actually am actively looking into it right now; I've identified the purpose of the "flags" parameter (it's actually the processor architecture) and I have some tests for find/add/delete that are passing on Windows 7, but I'm still trying to figure out how to make them pass on 8 and 10, and they need some cleaning up, and then I'll need to adjust my implementation to fit inside setupapi. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 2, 2024

[Bug 55859] LabView 2023.3.1 fails to install

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55859 --- Comment #21 from Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #20) > (In reply to Alex Henrie from comment #19) > > Rebase the merge request every month until it gets more attention. > > No, please don't do that. That wastes CI resources and doesn't help anything. If the MR is not updated, people will think that it has been abandoned and that no one cares about it anymore. And if it is updated in a way that does not rerun the tests, people will be concerned that tests that were written after the patch was written might start to fail when the patch is merged. In my humble opinion, both of those considerations are worth more than than the cost to the CI server, which is probably not much if the submitter waits a full month between each rebase. However, if the Wine project leadership wants Fabian and me to stop rebasing when it's not strictly necessary, then we'll just have to defer to your preferences. More to the point, what can we take off of your plate to give you (or whoever the appropriate reviewer might be) time to review the patch and identify specific action items to move it forward? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 2, 2024

[Bug 54807] Keil UV4 C51 9.03 (demo) hangs on exit

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54807 --- Comment #20 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Roman from comment #19) > Great that you find a reason, but it fixable? I sent <https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5118>. The problem with that merge request is that, while it's probably reliably good enough for this application, it isn't really enough to solve the broader problem of kernel-side code getting into an inconsistent state when threads are terminated. It needs more thought. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 2, 2024

[Bug 29384] Multiple applications expect correct handling of WRITECOPY memory protection (Voobly fails to launch Age of Empires II, MSYS2)

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29384 --- Comment #65 from realbug <naworldw(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to chris from comment #64) > (In reply to realbug from comment #63) > > How do I apply this hack? I don't know anything about programming.. > > To patch wine, you have to compile it. And if you don't know anything about > that, just forget it. Is there a possibility that this patch will be applied to the official or beta version? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 2, 2024

[Bug 56506] New: strmbase TRACEs occasionally fail to print floats

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56506 Bug ID: 56506 Summary: strmbase TRACEs occasionally fail to print floats Product: Wine Version: 9.5 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: quartz Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: blubban(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- $ WINEDEBUG=trace+quartz ./wine dlls/quartz/tests/x86_64-windows/quartz_test.exe mpegvideo 2>&1 | grep NewSegment | head -n2 0024:trace:quartz:sink_NewSegment pin 00007FFFFF225C50 L"MPEG video decoder":L"Input", start 0.001, stop 0.002, rate e. 0024:trace:quartz:sink_NewSegment pin 00007FFFFE2FF8C0 L"sink":L"sink", start 0.001, stop 0.002, rate 1.0000000000000000e+000. The strmbase copy in quartz_test.exe calls msvcrt printf and correctly prints 1.0000000000000000e+000. The strmbase copy in winegstreamer.dll calls ntdll's printf, which does not support float operands and just prints 'e'. I think that can be fixed by adding msvcrt as a dep of winegstreamer (without changing anything else), but I'm not sure, and I'm even less sure if that has any side effects. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 1, 2024

[Bug 29384] Multiple applications expect correct handling of WRITECOPY memory protection (Voobly fails to launch Age of Empires II, MSYS2)

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29384 --- Comment #64 from chris(a)novazur.fr --- (In reply to realbug from comment #63) > How do I apply this hack? I don't know anything about programming.. To patch wine, you have to compile it. And if you don't know anything about that, just forget it. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 1, 2024

[Bug 47952] SonyEricsson PC Suite - Installer hangs

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47952 --- Comment #9 from joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> --- Yes, it is a good idea to upload it in archive.org. Thanks a lot. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 1, 2024

[Bug 47952] SonyEricsson PC Suite - Installer hangs

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47952 --- Comment #8 from Maik Wagner <maiktapwagner(a)aol.com> --- (In reply to joaopa from comment #7) > Is it this software? I don't know. Let's compare as I don't know if they also did a French version: sha256sum Sony_Ericsson_PC_Suite_6.011.00_Web_DEU.exe 644c7b34adebec50d3e38e53865e31b1af26ae7a376bda420b88b4a7a6ad17ad Sony_Ericsson_PC_Suite_6.011.00_Web_DEU.exe If you want to I can upload this to archive.org or somewhere else. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 1, 2024

[Bug 29384] Multiple applications expect correct handling of WRITECOPY memory protection (Voobly fails to launch Age of Empires II, MSYS2)

by WineHQ Bugzilla

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29384 --- Comment #63 from realbug <naworldw(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Fabian Maurer from comment #56) > Created attachment 75727 [details] > Basic hack that helps for chromium issues How do I apply this hack? I don't know anything about programming.. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

April 1, 2024