http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-08-05 21:13 -------
The testapp is no longer available. (404)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2932
------- Additional Comments From spamtrap475rsd(a)wanadoo.fr 2005-08-05 17:33 -------
(back from the weekend)
I have never tried these manipulations before, but am willing to try.
I will try alone a bit and contact you if I have some problems.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1434
Bug 1434 depends on bug 2131, which changed state.
Bug 2131 Summary: 16-bit games bundled with windows fail to load (freecell, solitaire)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2131
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2131
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 16:14 -------
Seems to me that this is a WONTFIX situation. It is a known bug, but due to the
way microsoft structured their cards.dll we cant have a 16- and 32-bit cards.dll
that can peacefully coexist without incident. Best I can say is to get a 32-bit
version of the game(s) from win2k/xp and use the builtin cards.dll.
Sorry.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-08-05 15:41 -------
> it would be nice to have a test case but I do not know if it would help
> (as Windows only tells 'you will get the default frequency for this mode' - and
> so the question would be 'what do they mean by default ?').
Yes, and that's the thing which should be discovered when writing the regression
tests. Isn't it possible? Nevermind, I will try to play on being in
appropriate mood myself.
BTW, I think Windows also accepts a value of 1 instead of 0 (according to MSDN).
> I would have sorted the modes by descending refresh frequency so we would always
> have choosen the highest one when asking for the default frequency.
Nice, thanks for that, Lionel.
Dustin, I see I am tired. It was bug 2939 I meant. How can I revert my last
changes in the bug report?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2919
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:40 -------
Yes, you are right, the 64-bit processors are able to run 32-bit apps just fine,
which indicates (since you are using 32-bit linux) that it is not a problem with
the processor, but merely a bug in wine (which is usually easier to fix lol).
As far as make check, a lot of the tests are known to be problematic at best, so
they arent really a good way to find a problem with your computer. Looks like it
is crashing in the kernel, from the backtrace you put in the first post. Ill
forward this bug to the developers..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:34 -------
ok. You pretty much have it down. Obviously, the URL should be either a url to
the game/program on the web, or (preferred) a link to the game/program in the
AppDB.. Summary is just that, a summary of the problem, so if you only notice
it in one program, go ahead and put that program's name in there, as you did.
Keywords can be found by clicking on the keywords link.. Usually regression if
we determine that a bug is a regression, download if someone posts a link to the
game's download in the comments (which is the preferred place for those), and so
forth.
As far as attachments, yes, screenshots are acceptable as attachments (just make
sure to choose the right type). In general if you need more information, just
ask the reporter to attach their log or screenshot or whatever to the bug. And
yes, 2 screenshots are better than 1.. Compressed attachments are ok, as long as
it is a widely used compression format (zip, tarball, gzip, bzip2, tar.gz, etc)
Of course some people dont get what you mean by attach, so most of the time I
will say "Please attach (not copy and paste) ..." and most of the time the 500
lines before and after the crash are all that is needed for a log (when it's a
crash), and the backtrace from winedebug if they are able to get it. When its
not a crash, I just have them run the program with the necessary WINEDEBUG=
commands and have them do whatever they do that causes the problem and then
close the program, so the logs for that are usually small, but sometimes not.. lol
Anyways
Once you attach them, I will know, and take a look.
If you want, you can check for MM7 bugs, and add to one that exists if it is
related, or open a new one. I will take a look at any logs you might have..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:33 -------
Resolving properly.. FIXED Dont forget about comment #9 though.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:31 -------
This is NOT a dupe of 2947, and 2947 is not a dupe of this one.. 2947's problem
is that the program does not close (or crashes when doing so).. This one's
problem is that the program wont run (or crashes when doing so).. Reopening bug..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.