http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
mike(a)codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)codeweavers.com 2006-26-01 07:22 -------
Patch applied. Closing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
------- Additional Comments From magnus(a)hacka.net 2006-26-01 06:18 -------
If you do not experience freezing issues when just launching Steam:
wine Steam.exe
Then you are experiencing a diffrent bug :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-26-01 04:52 -------
In order to find out, if there is the space before printer, I have taken two
screenshots from ISS under WXP.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)codeweavers.com 2006-26-01 01:40 -------
We already define symbols in the preloader for -finstrument-functions and they
haven't changed so far. Won't your patch will break if somebody changes the
name of the option "-fno-stack-protector"? In any case, I know that somebody
using gentoo will find the "breakage" first. :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
------- Additional Comments From vapier(a)gentoo.org 2006-26-01 00:01 -------
the reason i didnt propose that type of patch is that the symbol names have
changed in the ssp implementation over time
yes, the patch you posted will work for the current mainline gcc, but it wont
work for people who have been using ssp before it was integrated officially
the original developer of ssp used the symbol names "__guard" and
"__stack_smash_handler"
also, but very very unlikely, defining the symbols locally wouldnt cover another
name symbol name change
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
vapier(a)gentoo.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #1760 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From vapier(a)gentoo.org 2006-25-01 23:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=1768)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=1768&action=view)
wine-no-ssp.patch
updated accordingly
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.