http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6338
------- Additional Comments From ryanbach(a)adelphia.net 2006-20-10 19:05 -------
Re-confirmed in Wine 0.9.23, it does go further now but still crashes with the
divide by zero error.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6484
------- Additional Comments From madewokherd(a)gmail.com 2006-20-10 18:51 -------
I don't know how to properly compile my own kernel. I'm convinced that the
kernel is not the problem as I've had wine working with stack traces with this
kernel before. I cannot do a regression test because versions as early as 0.9.18
(haven't tried anything earlier), which worked for me at one time, now have this
problem.
I'm sure this was triggered by some change in my system, but I don't know what
it could be.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6484
------- Additional Comments From the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com 2006-20-10 18:45 -------
Well are you going to compile a kernel with that fixed? Or do a regression test?
It was my understanding that other splits don't work with wine. So that is what
I'm thinking, as winedbg works for me.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6439
------- Additional Comments From a_villacis(a)palosanto.com 2006-20-10 17:42 -------
Created an attachment (id=3900)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3900&action=view)
Patch to prevent the use of CreateCompatibleDC at GetDIBits (try 1)
(quoting myself from wine-devel)
The only users of _CheckNotSysLevel in the Wine tree are dlls/user and dll/gdi
. In dlls/user the pattern seems to be to use USER_Lock() and USER_Unlock() in
strict pairs to protect blocks of code and not call any other functions that
use USER_CheckNotLock(). In dlls/gdi the lock is taken once every time a
reference to a GDI object is requested, but the rule about not calling other
functions that check GDI_CheckNotLock() can be violated (at least in my bug) on
the rendering of a metafile, as shown by the sequence:
(App tries to draw an icon into a metafile)
DrawIconEx calls into StretchBlt
(dlls/gdi/bitblt.c:140) StretchBlt calls DC_GetDCUpdate, then DC_GetDCPtr .
Both of these functions increment the GDI lock, so it ends up with a lock count
of (at least) 2.
(dlls/gdi/bitblt.c:148) With lock held, StretchBlt calls into
dcDst->funcs->pStretchBlt. Since this is a metafile, it calls into
EMFDRV_StretchBlt
(dlls/gdi/enhmfdrv/bitblt.c:186) EMFDRV_StretchBlt delegates to
EMFDRV_BitBlockTransfer
(dlls/gdi/enhmfdrv/bitblt.c:163) EMFDRV_BitBlockTransfer calls into GetDIBits
<-- possible source of bug?
(dlls/gdi/dib.c:556) GetDIBits calls CreateCompatibleDC with the source HDC
(dlls/gdi/dc.c:728) CreateCompatibleDC() calls into GDI_CheckNotLock
unconditionally. But StretchBlt already raised the lock count --> debug
assertion.
So, when metafiles are involved, this sequence of calls triggers the debug
assertion in CreateCompatibleDC().
(quote from Alexandre Julliard)
Yes, and the assertion should remain there. The real bug is that
GetDIBits creates a new DC, it shouldn't need to do that.
This is the first attempt at a patch that will fix the debug assertion when
icons are rendered into metafiles (triggered by Enterprise Architect 6.5, and
possibly others). This patch simply removes mentions of memdc, created by a
call to CreateCompatibleDC(), and redirects calls to GetDIBColorTable() to use
the original DC instead of memdc.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
flavio.henrique(a)provenda.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |flavio.henrique(a)provenda.com
| |.br
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6485
the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OS/Version|other |Linux
------- Additional Comments From the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com 2006-20-10 17:05 -------
Please tell me this information:
The versions of the Kernel, Libc, Gcc, X Windows, Video driver. And please tell
whether you are using AIGLX, 3D desktop, etc. Also tell me your CPU architechure.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6488
the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com 2006-20-10 16:59 -------
closing invalid
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6488
the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com 2006-20-10 16:59 -------
Anything we would actually want for a bug report? A REAL bug report. If the
AppDB page is a mess, complain to the maintainers. The AppDB is meant to be a
discussion of such things. If you want to ask a question, ask there or on
wine-users.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.