http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5488
------- Additional Comments From ale.bol(a)tiscali.it 2006-23-08 02:32 -------
I cannot apply the patch,
I donwloaded wine-0.9.19 extract to a folder and then in tha folder I copied
http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=2759&action=view as patch.diff, but
when trying to do: patch -p1 < patch.diff I get this error:
GeNtOo wine # cp attachment.cgi wine-0.9.19/patch.diff
GeNtOo wine # cd wine-0.9.19
GeNtOo wine-0.9.19 # patch -p1 < patch.diff
patching file dlls/opengl32/wgl.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 602 (offset 12 lines).
patching file dlls/winex11.drv/opengl.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 623 (offset 16 lines).
patching file libs/wine/mmap.c
patching file loader/preloader.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 109.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file loader/preloader.c.rej
Please help me!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6035
Summary: Wine-preloader segfaults when compiled with GCC 4.1
unless using -fno-stack-protector
Product: Wine
Version: 0.9.19.
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: scott(a)open-vote.org
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/56965
Found on the Ubuntu bug reports:
"The problem seems to be that the %gs register that holds the thread local stack
is not setup correctly since the normal _start function is not use in
wine-preloader. The stack protector uses the %gs register and the stack
protector is enabled by -fstack-protector.
If you compile the wine-preloader with -fno-stack-protector it will thus not
cause segmentation fault."
"The real fix is to correct the wine-preloader to follow proper
convention, I assume. For now turn off the stack protector as a
work-around and file a bug with the wine devs."
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5973
------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-23-08 01:40 -------
It is strange, but I cannot even replicate the bug. The program no more crashes
that way. I tested both with old and new Import2000, regression tested between
0.9.18 and 0.9.19 and it all works (except for other reported bugs, such as 5845).
Whatever it was, I cannot catch it :-(
I upgraded kernel 2.6.17.something to 2.6.17.8 since. Faulty kernel? Electricity
shortage? I really don't know. I'm testing on other machine with 2.6.17.7 too.
Bug disappeared so quickly as it appeared.
Should it be marked as CLOSED/WORKSFORM?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5849
------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-23-08 01:30 -------
Created an attachment (id=3396)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3396&action=view)
Logfile, bz2-ed +loaddll,ole,imm,msvcrt,msi OK oleaut32=b
Logfile with builtin oleaut32.
Again, I aborted the program immediately when the (wrong) date displayed.
If I would attemped to change the wrong date, program would just beep upon
clicking on "OK" a won't proceed any further.
I mean, GETTING the date from system is the first fault, and SETTING is the
second. Of course, they may be connected, they may be caused by the same bug.
However I feel, that it could be better to first solve the date, that program
offers (tat he gets from system).
Now, the logs end at the same moment -when program displays the offered
"today's date". One can compare, where is the difference between native and
builtin oleaut32 behaviour.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5849
------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-23-08 01:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=3395)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3395&action=view)
Logfile, bz2-ed +loaddll,ole,imm,msvcrt,msi OK oleaut32=n
Logfile with native oleaut32. Everything is OK.
I aborted the program immediately when the date was displayed -I haven't
attemped to change or confirm the date, because program would start then.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5987
renu.rajput(a)tcs.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dank(a)kegel.com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.