http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6313
------- Additional Comments From truiken(a)gmail.com 2006-30-09 13:29 -------
You should bisect until there's only one patch left.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6313
------- Additional Comments From ead1234(a)hotmail.com 2006-30-09 13:26 -------
I did some regression testing and entered git bisect bad and git bisect good for
the ones that didn't work and did work and view it through git bisect visualize.
I'm not quite sure how to pinpoint the exact patch that broke this but my git
bisect good is at 2006-08-28 18:15, so it broke between 2006-08-28 18:15 and
2006-08-29 sometime.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6326
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2006-30-09 11:29 -------
Please use "unified diff" format (diff -u old_file new_file) and send your patch
to wine-patches(a)winehq.org
Thank you.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219
vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |svdw(a)udel.edu
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2006-30-09 11:23 -------
*** Bug 6324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6324
vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|major |normal
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Priority|P1 |P2
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2006-30-09 11:23 -------
Safedisc protection is not supported.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 219 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6327
------- Additional Comments From sveit(a)earthlink.net 2006-30-09 11:21 -------
The patch works for Fedora Core 3 also. It should work with all POSIX OSes.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6327
Summary: [PATCH] TIME_ClockTimeToFileTime calculation incorrect
on FC5
Product: Wine
Version: 0.9.21.
Platform: PC
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-kernel
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: sveit(a)earthlink.net
The TIME_ClockTimeToFileTime function incorrectly divides the clock ticks by
1000000 on Fedora Core 5. The calculation is correct on Fedora Core 3. The
problem is that the code uses the obsolete CLK_TCK macro, which doesn't exist on
FC5. On FC3 the is set to 100. The code defines CLK_TCK as CLOCKS_PER_SEC
(defined as 1000000) on FC5. According to the times(2):
The number of clock ticks per second can be obtained using
sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK);
In POSIX-1996 the symbol CLK_TCK (defined in <time.h>) is mentioned as
obsolescent. It is obsolete now.
The attached patch fixes this problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.