http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8123
ns03ja(a)brocku.ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From ns03ja(a)brocku.ca 2007-27-04 05:51 -------
This is indeed fixed in git. Marking resolved.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7386
infyquest(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From infyquest(a)gmail.com 2007-27-04 05:47 -------
Closing this issue as the main reason the bug has been fixed.
If there are any more new issues please raise new bugs.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8164
------- Additional Comments From xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk 2007-27-04 05:00 -------
I've found already 4 or 5 installers up to now, that fail this way. Could this
please be fixed before next wine-release 0.9.36, otherwise we'll run again in
several duplicate bug reports i fear.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8170
------- Additional Comments From focht(a)gmx.net 2007-27-04 04:03 -------
Hello,
another one, probably same category ...
--- snip ---
trace:msvcrt:__unDNameEx
(0x34e440,??$?5DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@std@@YAAAV?$basic_istream@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@0@AAV10@AAD@Z,256,0x6139c960,0x6139c9a0,(nil),1800)
trace:msvcrt:get_literal_string Failed at '?' in
?5DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@std@@YAAAV?$basic_istream@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@0@AAV10@AAD@Z
xe: undname.c:186: str_array_push: Assertion `ptr' failed.
wine: Assertion failed at address 0x7b2a48b2 (thread 0009), starting debugger...
--- snip ---
Should be:
--- snip undname.exe ---
Undecoration of :- "??$?5DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@std@@YAAAV?$basic_istream@DU?$c
har_traits@D@std@@@0@AAV10@AAD@Z"
is :- "class std::basic_istream<char,struct std::char_traits<char> > & __cdecl s
td::operator>><char,struct std::char_traits<char> >(class std::basic_istream<cha
r,struct std::char_traits<char> > &,char &)"
--- snip undname.exe ---
As workaround i currently force the debugger to use native version and let the
debuggee use the builtin one (if needed).
How about automating the "compliance" testing between Micro$oft undname and
wine's version?
E.g. a little tool which loads both, the builtin version and the native one by
late binding (LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress), feeds both with same input and
compare the outputs against each other?
Dll names should be supplied on command line to get different msvcrt versions
tested.
Throw large quantities of binaries (.exe, .dlls) which export decorated symbols
at this tool.
E.g. a script which recursively scans filesystem, pick of any dll, dump exports,
pass it to both demangle calls and compare outputs.
Guard the demangle calls with SEH.
That way you get a much "real world" test cases than msvcrt cpp test.
Regards
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177
------- Additional Comments From dmitry(a)codeweavers.com 2007-27-04 03:58 -------
WINEDEBUG=+font wine "~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/...../program.exe"
&>~/font8177.log
bzip2 -9 font8177.log
and attach font8177.log.bz2 here.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177
------- Additional Comments From software(a)astrojar.org.uk 2007-27-04 03:53 -------
I don't understand what you mean by a "+font long".
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177
------- Additional Comments From dmitry(a)codeweavers.com 2007-27-04 03:42 -------
Freetype handles bitmap windows fonts along with truetype ones.
Can you generate a +font long and attach it here?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7698
------- Additional Comments From l_bratch(a)yahoo.co.uk 2007-27-04 02:38 -------
I've applied this and compiled it this morning, and will give it a proper test
tonight.
One question though - i see this is something specific for fonts of the name
"HL2MP". Do you happen to know if this is likely to be the same name used in
other varients such as Counter-Strike Source?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8154
truiken(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From truiken(a)gmail.com 2007-26-04 23:27 -------
I can't reproduce this either.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8187
------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2007-26-04 23:09 -------
Indeed. To get the app to load, all I need to do after the
winetricks command I gave above is set PATH to where the libraries
got installed in c:\windows\winsxs, e.g.
PATH=C:\windows\winsxs\x86_Microsoft.VC80.CRT_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_8.0.50727.42_x-ww_0de06acd;C:\windows\winsxs\x86_Microsoft.VC80.MFC_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_8.0.50727.42_x-ww_dec6ddd2;c:\windows\system32;c:\windows
then remove them from C:\windows\system32.
I guess I can update winetricks with this tomorrow morning so
nobody has to do it by hand.
The next problem with the app is the same as in bug 3221 comment 10
( http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3221#c10 ). That workaround
works here, too. The next problem is bug 7114. That, and it's real slow.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.