http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8165
vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2007-24-04 18:18 -------
Then why create a duplicate?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8033 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8165
Summary: TOPO 2.7.6 causes page fault
Product: Wine
Version: 0.9.35.
Platform: PC-x86-64
URL: http://cholla.mmto.org/computers/linux/wine/topo2.html
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: tom(a)mmto.org
When I try to run NGS TOPO! version 2.7.6 it starts, but I get
a page fault with backtrace when I select the state I want to
look at. TOPO did work with older versions of Wine (like 20041019),
but has not worked for over a year -- I have tried
Wine versions 0.9.17, 0.9.27, and 0.9.35.
Bug 8033 I think documents this same behavior for a newer version
of TOPO!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8077
------- Additional Comments From cjstimpson(a)utwire.net 2007-24-04 17:00 -------
Created an attachment (id=5926)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=5926&action=view)
mshtml.patch
Here's a patch to fix the problem. It basically puts
This->readed += This->nsstream->buf_size;
where it was before the regression.
Can someone verify that it doesn't break utf-16?
And that the patch is correct.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6788
------- Additional Comments From titan.costa(a)wanadoo.fr 2007-24-04 16:18 -------
Could you enable midi debug channel with "WINEDEBUG=+midi wine ..." after
applying Micha's patch.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7940
------- Additional Comments From Hubmasterflex(a)hotmail.com 2007-24-04 15:53 -------
Does this mean that you're able to run Shareaza in 0.9.35?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8163
------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2007-24-04 15:20 -------
Please don't download random DLLs from dll-files.com...
it's safer to download runtime installers from microsoft.com.
For instance, to download and install mdac2.7, you could do
wget http://kegel.com/wine/winetricks
sh winetricks fakeie6 mdac27
What is the name of the software? Got a URL that describes it?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8118
------- Additional Comments From elektroschock(a)linuxmail.org 2007-24-04 15:17 -------
To my surprise, yes, it was installed. just the desktop icon
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7469
------- Additional Comments From stfan4cjk(a)gmail.com 2007-24-04 13:51 -------
I am still not able to install COD2. It still gives me this error. I am on
version 0.9.35. I am installing with 6 cd's maybe that could be why? It doesn't
start that installer at all though.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
------- Additional Comments From focht(a)gmx.net 2007-24-04 13:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=5925)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=5925&action=view)
Verification of SetupQueryRegisteredOsComponent prototype/stub impl
Hello,
the discussion regarding syssetup.dll.SetupQueryRegisteredOsComponent caught my
interest :)
Attached is an extended test case (originating from developer thread) which
contains the meaning of parameter/struct member data revealed (struct layout)
and a working implementation.
It could serve as sample for dozen other syssetup.dll api exports belonging to
this category (Register/Unregister/SetRegistered/Enumerate OS Setup
Components).
Both versions of this export (native windows and the impl) are compared against
each other to ensure the data returned is really at right place.
All struct member data is read from registry.
There is no magic involved (as implied in developer thread).
Only the "unused"/"reserved" fields at the tail of each struct gave me some
headache, but i came to conclusion it's just garbage from temporary stack copy
(see comments inside code).
Regards
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.