http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5312
dank(a)kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |7081
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2007-28-06 07:02 -------
This is now just waiting for us to get our IE implementation
up to snuff so we can create those registry entries by default.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8813
mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|wine-kernel |wine-comctl32
------- Additional Comments From mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com 2007-28-06 03:48 -------
Changing component
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7482
austinenglish(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |austinenglish(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7591
austinenglish(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |austinenglish(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7482
------- Additional Comments From austinenglish(a)gmail.com 2007-28-06 03:14 -------
I can confirm under wine 0.9.39. Something to add that the reporter didn't. Upon
launching setup, after the splash screen, the program changed my resolution from
1280 x 1024 to something much smaller, looked like 800 x 600 (not sure exactly,
haven't used any resolution that small in ages). This was under kubuntu feisty,
with nvidia binary drivers and with a clean .wine directory.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7228
austinenglish(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |austinenglish(a)gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From austinenglish(a)gmail.com 2007-28-06 03:11 -------
Shouldn't this bug be considered invalid since the program does install?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534
------- Additional Comments From lich(a)math.spbu.ru 2007-28-06 02:57 -------
>Since the whole WS_EX_TRAYWINDOW style is a big fat smelly hack and we are all
>using it wouldnt it be better to have a nice proper looking 'big fat smelly
>hack' instead of gray turd?
WS_EX_TRAYWINDOW is a very special case to handle - e.g. every time we need to repaint window Xlib
XClearWindow must be used, not WINAPI RepaintWindow. To achieve this I hacked SetIcon function. This is the nicest
way I found, but it may not look nice.
Also problems with desktop and unmanaged mode. And there are other cases which I cannot ever imagine.
IMO if we want "to have a nice proper looking 'big fat smelly hack' instead of gray turd" we should reengineer
systray:
1) Check desktop mode and do not use systray in this case.
2) Add balloon messages support
3) Add ability to show/hide icons (There are applications which does not change icon, but have a set of icons. To
change icon app hides active and shows other icon. Currently all icons are visible.)
4) Implement icons for systray_adaptor window. (I want to see the app icon in KDE systray options, not generic
wine icon.)
5) Implement transparency via ParentRelative
As I see, every of these cases need to communicate with X directly. So, winex11.drv will be hacked in many places.
If we move almost all hacks to separate file, will it be acceptable?
What about full XEMBED support, it is more generic and much more accurate to develop within wine. Yes, hacks like
WS_EX_.... will be present, but in this case it will be called WS_EX_XEMBED which sounds profound [ ;-)] and more
generic.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
------- Additional Comments From hverbeet(a)gmail.com 2007-28-06 02:48 -------
That would be commit 2e786e09bb3354ee6d3fb96fa7f100e8c2e1efc7.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.