http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7986
Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk
Summary|Citavi trial fails to |Citavi trial fails to
|install .net framework |install correctly
--- Comment #11 from Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> 2008-01-31 03:18:17 ---
Tested this today. On a fresh new ~/.wine, the .net 2.0 downloads and installs
fine. Then it downloads mdac, and fails to install it (MDAC_TYP.exe), but i
think that's already covered by another app. Installing it manually with
winetricks (winetricks mdac28) works around this. Finally the app downloads and
installs jet40 and then completes successfully.
With the workarounds for starting .net apps in wine, I was able to start the
application, but then got a Microsoft Jet.OLEDB error, so i had to do
winetricks jet40, though the installer installed it already. Apparently this is
still a bug in the installer. After that, the app starts fine into the main
menu. Didn't test any further.
See screenshots http://appdb.winehq.org/appimage.php?iId=15846 and
http://appdb.winehq.org/appimage.php?iId=15845
(changed title as the .net installs fine)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7245
Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> 2008-01-31 01:13:39 ---
closing
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7245
Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> 2008-01-31 01:13:25 ---
Actually it starts fine for me now in both normal mode and virtual desktop
mode, so this bug is fixed. I think it's fixed by Alexandre's patches moving
stuff back from server to user32, just before wine-0.9.54.
closing fixed
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #38 from Toni Spets <toni.spets(a)gmail.com> 2008-01-31 01:05:17 ---
Confirming that the attached patch from Dmitry works. NFS3 loads fine now.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3766
--- Comment #17 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-01-31 00:33:13 ---
Yes, looks like the patch helped. I sent it to wine-patches.
Now the app crashes somewhere in its 16-bit code while accessing memory
at 0xffffffff. But that's not clear at all why, and the registers don't
tell anything useful to me.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #37 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-01-30 23:48:18 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> How is this bug about a different problem? I am the reporter, and I reported
> exactly this problem.
My impression was that it was identified that this bug was triggered by one
of my patches (even if the way to run an application was incorrect).
To better understand what is going on in your case please generate
a +relay,+seh,+tid log, compress it with 'bzip2 -9' and attach it here.
Also, is that a regression?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #36 from Joel Parker <jjk3(a)msstate.edu> 2008-01-30 23:25:41 ---
How is this bug about a different problem? I am the reporter, and I reported
exactly this problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #35 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-01-30 23:10:56 ---
Closing.
Although GetModuleHandleExW/FreeLibrary trashing the library refcounts
should be investigated.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #34 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-01-30 23:09:10 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Please reopen. Using wine 0.9.54:
Pease open a separate bug, this one is about a different problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4230
--- Comment #7 from James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> 2008-01-30 23:06:14 ---
There is a need for the regression test. This bug likely won't be fixed
without that information. Yes it's still a valid bug, as per comment #2.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.