http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
--- Comment #64 from neil(a)parkwaycc.co.uk 2009-09-28 06:48:45 ---
(In reply to comment #62)
> It's not a question of being paid, we fix issues that affect real applications,
> not every potential difference in behavior. This has always been the policy.
I'm sorry, I was not aware of that when I originally filed the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
--- Comment #63 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-09-28 06:26:47 ---
That's correct for all bugs in WineHQ bugzilla. I'm just curious, what are
you basing your "empirical evidence" on? And why do you insist on using or
implementing an undocumented API?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
--- Comment #62 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-09-28 06:26:19 ---
It's not a question of being paid, we fix issues that affect real applications,
not every potential difference in behavior. This has always been the policy.
Please show a real app affected by the problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
--- Comment #61 from neil(a)parkwaycc.co.uk 2009-09-28 06:17:09 ---
(In reply to comment #59)
> (In reply to comment #58)
> > You just don't get it, do you? I reported a bug. You fixed a different bug,
> > that happened to get mentioned along the line. Please don't confuse the two!
> You are confusing yourself, starting with a not clear bug summary, and
> continuing without any real app that depends on it, or a real test case
> added to the Wine testing framework.
You're still making errors yourself. There are test cases here. It's
unfortunate that they only work under genuine Windows. But I understand that
you only get paid to fix bugs that prevent real applications from working,
which is the real reason why you're not interested in bug 20193.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20193
Summary: Code for undocumented SwitchToThisWindow function does
not reflect empirical evidence when alt_tab is false
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/user32/winpos.c#L
85
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P2
Component: user32
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: neil(a)parkwaycc.co.uk
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #5725 +++
The code for SwitchToThisWindow has improved since bug #5725 was filed, and now
works correctly when alt_tab is true. However when alt_tab is false, the
Windows behaviour differs in two ways; the first is that Windows does not
restore iconic windows (although it does still activate them), and the second
is that Windows sends the previous foreground window to the back (unless it's a
topmost window).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
--- Comment #60 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-09-28 06:11:48 ---
*** Bug 20193 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
--- Comment #59 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-09-28 06:09:43 ---
(In reply to comment #58)
> You just don't get it, do you? I reported a bug. You fixed a different bug,
> that happened to get mentioned along the line. Please don't confuse the two!
You are confusing yourself, starting with a not clear bug summary, and
continuing without any real app that depends on it, or a real test case
added to the Wine testing framework.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20192
Summary: Crash by start of service
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.14
Platform: PC-x86-64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: advapi32
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: maxstirlitz(a)web.de
Created an attachment (id=23806)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=23806)
debug output
Crash by start of service.
Result of regression testing using Git:
540fe928424063b930c6076758822b382e734ad7 is first bad commit
commit 540fe928424063b930c6076758822b382e734ad7
Author: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org>
Date: Mon Jan 19 20:24:00 2009 +0100
advapi32: Get rid of the client-side service handle management.
:040000 040000 54b5ae156ac80a1ce6eb67fe844d409c43201739
de2078547a3787bf449630cd0426fa6e855a4a53 M dlls
Debug output in attachment error.log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
--- Comment #58 from neil(a)parkwaycc.co.uk 2009-09-28 05:46:29 ---
You just don't get it, do you? I reported a bug. You fixed a different bug,
that happened to get mentioned along the line. Please don't confuse the two!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Incorrect Delphi 3 window |Code for undocumented
|activation |SwitchToThisWindow function
| |does not reflect empirical
| |evidence
--- Comment #57 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-09-28 05:42:35 ---
This bug as described is fixed. Open a new one, and add a test case with
the steps to reproduce there.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.