http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975
------- Additional Comments From rindolf(a)directvinternet.com 2002-08-19 14:38 -------
Created an attachment (id=269)
Same as previous, only with CVS as of 20021819
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973
nt-(a)gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |nt-(a)gmx.de
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975
------- Additional Comments From johane(a)lysator.liu.se 2002-08-19 14:12 -------
Have you tried enabling the Desktop option to see if there is any difference?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=931
------- Additional Comments From dusanv(a)cadlink.com 2002-08-19 13:39 -------
The bug appears to be in BITBLT_InternalStretchBlt. It only happens when
PerfectGraphics is on.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=931>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681
paulm(a)astro.gla.ac.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From paulm(a)astro.gla.ac.uk 2002-08-19 11:51 -------
Looks like patch:
http://cvs.winehq.com/patch.py?id=102885566385316432740456
fixed this bug by correcting a broken regression test. The problem was an
out-by-one error in calculating a buffer size.
Can someone confirm that this is correct?
Cheers,
Paul.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975
------- Additional Comments From rindolf(a)directvinternet.com 2002-08-19 11:22 -------
The log I just submitted was with the 20020814 version, I'm about to update
and try again.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975
------- Additional Comments From rindolf(a)directvinternet.com 2002-08-19 11:18 -------
Created an attachment (id=268)
bzipped log of 'wine --debugmsg +relay install.exe'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978
apa3a(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-08-19 10:09 -------
Hi onederer,
Wine project itself does not provide binary packages and does not control any
Wine distributions, provided by anybody else, as stated on the download page:
http://www.winehq.com/download/
In this particular you can contact Mandrake mailing lists or tech support for
help about their packages. You can also contact wine-users(a)winehq.com mailing
list for help. There are probably other people who run Wine on this particular
distribution.
Are you sure you removed all the old Wine files before installing the package?
Here you can find instructions how to do total cleanup:
http://www.winehq.org/fom-meta/cache/1.html
Try to do this and reinstall the Wine rmp.
If the binary package still does not work for you do again total cleanup and try
to install it from source. Usually it is fairly simple. The README file with the
source provides very good instructions how to do that and you can expect much
more help from us as we are responsible for it.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978
Summary: Missing files in new installation. Mandrake i586.
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: wine-files
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: onederer(a)myrealbox.com
Missing wine related files in Mandrake 8.2 RPM distribution. Would not run "out of the box". Complained of missing lib.wine.so, lib.nt.so.
Had to search Internet to find missing library files.
After that, it could not successfully run a single Windows app, to conclusion. Kept on complaining to add 'WinMM' section to Wine config. file.
I don't have the faintest clue what is needed to do this.
There is no config file in /etc/wine/. Only registry files are there. If the registry files is the "config" file, then that should be clarified.
There is a BLANK config file in /home/~user~/.wine. Wine will now not run because it is complaining about this blank 'config' file.
Loose related wine lib.xxx files should be part of the package, and not spread out over the internet.
Missing WinMM section in Wine config. file should be taken care of by the "experts".
They know what has to be entered there. I surely don't! How well controlled is the bundling of the Wine package? Is it a loose arrangement?
Did Mandrake miss the bandwagon?
This is what makes 'newbies' give up, quit, and go back to Win**.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975
------- Additional Comments From johane(a)lysator.liu.se 2002-08-19 08:36 -------
Bug 969 turned out to be still present, but to determine if we have the same
problem you could help a lot by enabling debugmsg=+relay, for a start.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.