wine-devel September 2008

wine-devel@winehq.org

116 participants
274 discussions

re: Fixing the conformance tests
by Dan Kegel 07 Sep '08

07 Sep '08

Paul V. wrote: > As we are slowly progressing towards a more green > test.winehq.org there are still some conformance tests > that fail either on all platforms or with a specific configuration (like IE7). Here's some data. On my new box (CPU: Core 2 Duo e8400, graphics: nVidia Corporation GeForce 8500 GT (rev a1) window manager: metacity 2.25.0 built from source) distro: 32 bit Hardy), out of 212 full runs of 'make -k test', here's a count of failures by test name: 6 d3d9 device 6 … [View More]

4 5

Re: wineboot: Basic RunOnceEx support v2 (with patch)
by Dmitry Timoshkov 07 Sep '08

07 Sep '08

"Johan Dahlin" <jdahlin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > +typedef HRESULT WINAPI (*DLLREGISTER) (void); > +typedef HRESULT WINAPI (*DLLINSTALL) (BOOL,LPCWSTR); This is still not right, have a look at other places that use pointers to the exported win32 APIs. > +typedef enum { > + ROEF_DISABLED = 0x00000000, > + ROEF_SHELLSTATUS = 0x00000004, > + ROEF_NOERRORDIALOGS = 0x00000008, > + ROEF_ERRORLOG = 0x00000010, > + ROEF_EXECUTELOG = 0x00000020, > +… [View More]

1 0

Re: Patchwatcher: failed regression tests: [6/10 AcceptEx] Implements sock_close_handle
by Scott Lindeneau 07 Sep '08

07 Sep '08

I don't understand, this patch doesn't cause any regressions on my machine using the latest git (none of them do). The patch[6/10] is (nearly) identical to the patch I submitted earlier (which did not cause regressions). The only difference is in the hash. The next patch[7/10] changes zero functionality because the function that is implemented in [7/10] is unused at this point in time and patch [7/10] passes the conformance tests. scott@SocialSycotic:~/programming/wine/wine/patch$ diff 9.7.2/… [View More]

2 2

Re: [1/2] hlink/tests: display the expected data, as well as the actual data.
by James Hawkins 07 Sep '08

07 Sep '08

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > This improves the error reporting for the hlink tests. > I think you need to think this one over. Why would we care to display the expected data, when the expected data is in the tests? For simple tests, e.g. last errors or simple integer results, displaying the expected data makes it easier to understand the returned value. On the other hand, for the hlink tests, the expected binary data adds no … [View More]

2 1

re: [3/10 AcceptEx] Modifies accept_socket, allows it to take sock structures instead of handles
by Dan Kegel 06 Sep '08

06 Sep '08

This patch seemed to cause wineserver to crash. See http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/1033.log http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/1034.log

2 2

Re: modified: dlls/wininet/http.c
by Hans Leidekker 06 Sep '08

06 Sep '08

On Wednesday 03 September 2008 20:33:25 Nerv wrote: > -It seems Windows XP only increments lpdwIndex if the Function returns > true, so it is fixed if you just look on bSuccess This patch is likely correct but please do add a test case to prove your finding. -Hans

1 0

Re: wined3d: Be more careful when deleting FBOs
by Henri Verbeet 06 Sep '08

06 Sep '08

Ignore these, I sent them a few days ago without being subscribed to the list.

1 0

Re: oleaut32: Add support for loading typelibs from NE files.
by Rob Shearman 05 Sep '08

05 Sep '08

2008/9/2 Huw Davies <huw(a)codeweavers.com>: > --- a/dlls/oleaut32/typelib.c > +++ b/dlls/oleaut32/typelib.c > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ > #include "winnls.h" > #include "winreg.h" > #include "winuser.h" > +#include "wine/winbase16.h" > > #include "wine/unicode.h" > #include "objbase.h" I don't think we should be including a 16-bit header file and using 16-bit functions in a 32-bit source file if we can avoid it. In this case, we can avoid it. -- Rob Shearman

2 2

Re: msi: Reduce destination file name used in the MoveFiles action to the long file name.
by James Hawkins 05 Sep '08

05 Sep '08

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Rob Shearman <robertshearman(a)gmail.com> wrote: > --- > dlls/msi/action.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > There doesn't appear to be any documentation on MSDN suggesting this > behaviour but it fixes the following snippet of a log from a > customised Office 2003 installer: > > 0065:trace:msi:msi_move_file copying > L"C:\\windows\\temp\\~OCW0023.TMP" -> L"C:\\Program … [View More]

2 1

re: Can we import MSConfig from ReactOS?
by Dan Kegel 05 Sep '08

05 Sep '08

Jason Spiro wrote: > Could the Wine team make up a whitelist of trusted ReactOS > developers who won't reverse engineer any Windows code? There is already a whitelist of sorts; look at whom Alexandre accepts patches from. > Or a whitelist of trusted portions of ReactOS...? IMHO it's not worth the effort. - Dan

1 0

← Newer
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel September 2008