wine-devel May 2011

wine-devel@winehq.org

79 participants
229 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Re: [PATCH try4] wininet: Added support for persistent HTTP connections
by Marvin 06 May '11

06 May '11

2 1

Re: po: Update French translation
by Nicolas Le Cam 06 May '11

06 May '11

> #: regedit.rc:88 > -#, fuzzy > msgid "Modify Binary Data..." > -msgstr "Modifier les données &binaires" > +msgstr "Modifier les données &binaires..." I'm not sure you can add a keyboard accelerator if there isn't one in the original message. -- Nicolas Le Cam

2 3

winscard/tests: Add test base functions of winscard.dll
by Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle＠t-systems.com 06 May '11

06 May '11

Sergey, >+ * Unit test suite for AVI Functions >+ * Copyright 2008 Detlef Riekenberg +#include "wingdi.h" >+#include "vfw.h" Please try and hide better the copy&paste origin of the code :-) >rezult result + ok(winscard_rezult != SCARD_F_INTERNAL_ERROR I recommend tests to be stricter, e.g. ok(result == SCARD_S_SUCCESS || result == SCARD_E_XYZ || broken(result == SCARD_E_...) Here's work done last year by Yauheni Baltouski and Aliaksei Hud. They are not working on winscard any more. I'd be pleased to eventually see winscard tests in Wine. Maybe you could merge this work? I *hope* I attached the latest version of the patch. If yes, it was verified last year to pass on: - native machines with and without card readers; - testbot, incl. w9x machines; - 64 bit? can't remember; - stock Linux (Ubuntu Lucid); - Linux with Mounir Idrassi's winscard dll (in which case the todo_wine succeed) and a card reader. It contains a good mixture of win_skip(), broken() and todo_wine to that effect. I had not submitted these tests in the past because IIRC there's still a resource leak (FreeLibrary following LoadLibrary; SCardFreeMemory following SCardListReaders AUTOALLOCATE) and some style issues (casts inside ok("%ld") formats) as well as IMHO too many redundant trace("testing X\n"), see $WINETEST_REPORT_SUCCESS. In their patch, LoadLibrary was necessary instead of a statically linked .exe because not all native systems provide winscard.dll Nowadays, successful tests on w9x are not considered important anymore, so this might be superfluous (but I don't know whether one can expect winscard on all machines since NT). +#ifndef SCARD_AUTOALLOCATE +#define SCARD_AUTOALLOCATE (DWORD)(-1) +#ifndef SCARD_SCOPE_USER +#define SCARD_SCOPE_USER 0x0000 was necessary because Wine's winscard.h does not yet provide enough definitions. -- Completing winscard.h would be a useful patch on its own. This test was considered the first of a series: small enough yet still doing something useful (ListReaders), but not yet depending on the presence of a chip card. Final comments on your initial patch: + mszReaders = malloc(cchReaders); HeapAlloc() is recommended in Wine, i.e. programming against the MS API. +START_TEST(winscard_api) Just name it winscard. Keep the name short because you use it on the command line. You don't initialize SCARD_READERSTATE as MSDN requires it for SCardGetStatusChange: "Important Each member of each structure in this array must be initialized to zero" and you don't check whether SCardListReaders returned at least one string in mszReaders for you to feed into SCardGetStatusChange. Regards, Jörg Höhle >From 3a936d8e0c100aee0da324d4d32e92368eefde88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yauheni Baltouski <ybaltouski(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:25:24 +0300 Subject: winscard/test: add initial test cases --- configure.ac | 1 + dlls/winscard/tests/Makefile.in | 11 +++ dlls/winscard/tests/scard.c | 180 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 dlls/winscard/tests/Makefile.in create mode 100644 dlls/winscard/tests/scard.c diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 61f376e..0309abc 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -2661,6 +2661,7 @@ WINE_CONFIG_TEST(dlls/winmm/tests) WINE_CONFIG_DLL(winnls.dll16,enable_win16) WINE_CONFIG_DLL(winnls32,,[winnls32]) WINE_CONFIG_DLL(winscard,,[winscard]) +WINE_CONFIG_TEST(dlls/winscard/tests) WINE_CONFIG_DLL(winsock.dll16,enable_win16) WINE_CONFIG_DLL(winspool.drv,,[winspool]) WINE_CONFIG_TEST(dlls/winspool.drv/tests) diff --git a/dlls/winscard/tests/Makefile.in b/dlls/winscard/tests/Makefile.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..879481b --- /dev/null +++ b/dlls/winscard/tests/Makefile.in @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +TOPSRCDIR = @top_srcdir@ +TOPOBJDIR = ../../.. +SRCDIR = @srcdir@ +VPATH = @srcdir@ +TESTDLL = winscard.dll +IMPORTS = kernel32 ntdll + +C_SRCS = \ + scard.c + +@MAKE_TEST_RULES@ diff --git a/dlls/winscard/tests/scard.c b/dlls/winscard/tests/scard.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fd751c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/dlls/winscard/tests/scard.c @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +/* + * Unit tests for winscard.dll functions + * + * Copyright 2010 Yauheni S Baltouski + * + * + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. + * + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + * Lesser General Public License for more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public + * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA + */ + +#include <stdarg.h> +#include <stdio.h> + +#include "windef.h" +#include "winbase.h" +#include "winerror.h" +#include "winver.h" + +#include <winscard.h> +#include "wine/test.h" + +#ifndef SCARD_AUTOALLOCATE +#define SCARD_AUTOALLOCATE (DWORD)(-1) +#endif + +#ifndef SCARD_SCOPE_USER +#define SCARD_SCOPE_USER 0x0000 +#endif + +static const CHAR winscardDll[] = "winscard.dll"; + +static LONG (WINAPI *pSCardEstablishContext)(DWORD ,LPCVOID, LPCVOID, LPSCARDCONTEXT); +static LONG (WINAPI *pSCardReleaseContext)(SCARDCONTEXT); +static LONG (WINAPI *pSCardListReadersA)(SCARDCONTEXT,LPCSTR,LPSTR,LPDWORD); +static LONG (WINAPI *pSCardListReadersW)(SCARDCONTEXT,LPCSTR,LPSTR,LPDWORD); + +static SCARDCONTEXT hSC; +static LPTSTR szReaders; +static DWORD cchReaders = SCARD_AUTOALLOCATE; + +static void test_SCardEstablishContext(void) { + LONG lReturn; + + trace("testing SCardEstablishContext\n"); + + lReturn = pSCardEstablishContext(SCARD_SCOPE_USER, + NULL, + NULL, + &hSC); + todo_wine + { + ok((SCARD_S_SUCCESS==lReturn || broken(SCARD_E_NO_SERVICE==lReturn /*service disabled */)), + "can't execute SCardEstablishContext, SCardEstablishContext ptr = %p, return = %ld\n", + pSCardEstablishContext, + (long)lReturn); + } +} + +static void test_SCardReleaseContext(void) { + LONG lReturn; + + trace("testing SCardReleaseContext\n"); + if (hSC) { + + lReturn = pSCardReleaseContext(hSC); } + + todo_wine + { + ok(SCARD_S_SUCCESS==lReturn && hSC, + "can't execute SCardReleaseContext, SCardReleaseContext ptr = %p, SCARDCONTEXT=%lx, return=%ld\n", + pSCardReleaseContext, + (long int)hSC, + (long)lReturn); + } +} + +static void test_SCardListReadersA(void) { + LONG lReturn; + + trace("testing SCardListReadersA\n"); + if (hSC) { + + lReturn = pSCardListReadersA(hSC, + NULL, + (LPTSTR)&szReaders, + &cchReaders); } + + todo_wine + { + ok((lReturn == SCARD_S_SUCCESS || lReturn == SCARD_E_NO_READERS_AVAILABLE) && hSC, + "can't execute SCardListReadersA, SCardListReadersA ptr = %p, SCARDCONTEXT=%lx, return=%ld\n", + pSCardListReadersA, + (long int)hSC, + (long)lReturn); + } +} + +static void test_SCardListReadersW(void) { + LONG lReturn; + + trace("testing SCardListReadersW\n"); + if (hSC) { + + lReturn = pSCardListReadersW(hSC, + NULL, + (LPTSTR)&szReaders, + &cchReaders);} + + todo_wine + { + ok((lReturn == SCARD_S_SUCCESS || lReturn == SCARD_E_NO_READERS_AVAILABLE) && hSC, + "can't execute SCardListReadersW, SCardListReadersW ptr = %p, SCARDCONTEXT=%lx, return=%ld\n", + pSCardListReadersW, + (long int)hSC, + (long)lReturn); + } +} + +static BOOL init_winscard(void){ +#define GET_PROC(func) \ + (p ## func = (void *)GetProcAddress(module, #func)) + HMODULE module=NULL; + trace("testing winscard initialization\n"); + module = LoadLibraryA(winscardDll); + if (!module) + { + win_skip("No winscard.dll found - aborting"); + return FALSE; + } + else { + + trace("loading winscard SCardEstablishContext\n"); + GET_PROC(SCardEstablishContext); + todo_wine ok(pSCardEstablishContext!=NULL, "can't initialize winscard SCardEstablishContext, error=%lx\n", (long int)GetLastError()); + if (pSCardEstablishContext==NULL) return FALSE; + + trace("loading winscard SCardReleaseContext\n"); + GET_PROC(SCardReleaseContext); + todo_wine ok(pSCardReleaseContext!=NULL, "can't initialize winscard SCardReleaseContext, error=%lx\n", (long int)GetLastError()); + if (pSCardReleaseContext==NULL) return FALSE; + + trace("loading winscard SCardListReadersA\n"); + GET_PROC(SCardListReadersA); + todo_wine ok(pSCardListReadersA!=NULL, "can't initialize winscard SCardListReadersA, error=%lx\n", (long int)GetLastError()); + if (pSCardListReadersA==NULL) return FALSE; + + trace("loading winscard SCardListReadersW\n"); + GET_PROC(SCardListReadersW); + todo_wine ok(pSCardListReadersW!=NULL, "can't initialize winscard SCardListReadersW, error=%lx\n", (long int)GetLastError()); + if (pSCardListReadersW==NULL) return FALSE; + + return TRUE; + } +#undef GET_PROC +} + + +START_TEST(scard) +{ + if (init_winscard()) { + test_SCardEstablishContext(); + if (hSC) + { + test_SCardListReadersW(); + test_SCardListReadersA(); + test_SCardReleaseContext();/*must be at end of tests*/ + } + } +} -- 1.7.0.4

1 0

avicap32: fix build with recent kernel headers
by Rafał Mużyło 06 May '11

06 May '11

Attached patch seems to fix build problem with recent kernel headers, where v4l1 was removed. I'm sending it here first (instead straight to wine-patches), as I have no real way of testing it - I only know it builds. As such, I haven't bothered yet with keeping consistant folding style. In case of any questions, CC me. PS.: qcap *might* need a similar, though far more complex fix.

2 1

Re: winscard/tests: Implement test for two functions of winscard.dll
by Marvin 06 May '11

06 May '11

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10750 Your paranoid android. === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6 === WVISTAADM (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6 === W2K8SE (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6 === W7PRO (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6

1 0

Re: winscard/tests: Implement test for two functions of winscard.dll
by Marvin 06 May '11

06 May '11

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10749 Your paranoid android. === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6 === WVISTAADM (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6 === W2K8SE (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6 === W7PRO (32 bit winscard_api) === winscard_api.c:37: Test failed: Can't connect to pcscd daemon 8010001d winscard_api.c:39: Test failed: Error call SCardIsValidContext 6

1 0

Strange zero operation in dlls/riched20/tests/editor.c (Coverity)
by Marcus Meissner 05 May '11

05 May '11

Hi Dylan, folks, Coverity sees following constructs in dlls/riched20/tests/editor.c introduced by your commit aa3b75f6b74fa87641b1f2b5912fbb82feb4c2da + SendMessage(hwndRichEdit, WM_CHAR, 22, + (MapVirtualKey('V', MAPVK_VK_TO_VSC) << 16) & 1); (several more of similar) The 4th argument is always 0 (because of (x<<16)&1). You added that Dylan, was perhaps |1 intended for a repeat count of 1? Ciao, Marcus

2 1

Re: [3/3] msxml3/domdoc: Add support for VT_ARRAY|VT_UI1 in domdoc_load(). (try 2)
by Nikolay Sivov 05 May '11

05 May '11

On 5/5/2011 00:38, Adam Martinson wrote: > > Fixes bugs 14864 + 16453. > --- > dlls/msxml3/domdoc.c | 27 +++++++++++++ > dlls/msxml3/tests/domdoc.c | 94 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > + case VT_ARRAY|VT_UI1: > + { > + SAFEARRAY *psa = V_ARRAY(&source); > + xmlChar *str; > + LONG len; > + UINT dim = SafeArrayGetDim(psa); > + > + switch (dim) > + { > + case 0: > + ERR("SAFEARRAY == NULL\n"); > + hr = E_INVALIDARG; > + break; > + case 1: > + /* Only takes UTF8 strings. > + * NOT NULL-terminated. */ > + SafeArrayAccessData(psa, (void**)&str); > + SafeArrayGetUBound(psa, 1,&len); > + hr = load_utf8(This, str, ++len, isSuccessful); > + SafeArrayUnaccessData(psa); > + break; > + default: > + FIXME("unhandled SAFEARRAY dim: %d\n", dim); > + hr = E_NOTIMPL; > + } > + } This could be simplified. SafeArrayGetUBound will fail for case 0 for example, and unhandled dimension should be WARN, IMO.

2 3

Re: [2/3] msxml3/domdoc: Add an internal function to load from a UTF8 string.
by Nikolay Sivov 05 May '11

05 May '11

On 5/5/2011 00:38, Adam Martinson wrote: > --- > dlls/msxml3/domdoc.c | 85 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) You don't need a separate helper for that. doparse() should do fine with "UTF-8" encoding parameter to force encoding. Also will it preserve existing document or will really create empty one on error is a question.

2 3

Re: cmd: WCMD_delete: simplify logic, avoid assigning variable to i tself (try 2)
by Alexandre Julliard 05 May '11

05 May '11

Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> writes: > Simpler version suggested by Henri. > I'm hoping this is enough of an improvement to be worth it. It would be better to build a simple mask and test against that, instead of all that silliness with booleans. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel May 2011