Dear Wine developers,
Bug 24389 documents an application crash due to the unimplemented
function msvcr90._wtoi_l. I have been looking into how to resolve this
problem. I see three workable options:
1. Implement msvcr90._wtoi_l by copying the code from ntdll._wtoi to
msvcrt, ignoring the locale parameter for now.
2. Forward msvcr90._wtoi_l to ntdll._wtoi via msvcr90.spec, ignoring
the locale parameter for now.
3. Implement msvcr90._wtoi_l as a stub function in msvcrt that always returns 0.
Any of these options would fix bug 24389. Which one should I work on?
-Alex
Am 24.07.2012 21:30, schrieb André Hentschel:
> ---
> dlls/msvcp90/ios.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
This has been obsoleted due to Piotrs changes, thx.
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://winetestbot.dolphin/JobDetails.pl?Key=44
Your paranoid android.
=== debiantesting (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://winetestbot.dolphin/JobDetails.pl?Key=43
Your paranoid android.
=== debiantesting (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://winetestbot.dolphin/JobDetails.pl?Key=41
Your paranoid android.
=== windowsxp (32 bit dom) ===
Can't copy TestLauncher to VM: :7094
I disagree with many of the choices in this series (for example, I
think casting an interface pointer to an inherited interface is fine,
and replacing that with QueryInterface just adds unnecessary
additional logic), but I don't think any semantics have been changed
and overall it's a good cleanup.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20282
Your paranoid android.
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== WVISTAADM (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PRO (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20281
Your paranoid android.
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== WVISTAADM (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PRO (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found