On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.de> wrote:
> ---
> patches/expire | 1 +
> patches/patches.css | 1 +
> patches/update | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/patches/expire b/patches/expire
> index f143ab1..3cf75e6 100755
> --- a/patches/expire
> +++ b/patches/expire
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ my %status_expiry =
> "split" => 7,
> "depend" => 7,
> "sequence" => 7,
> + "staging" => 30,
> "superseded" => 1,
> "testcase" => 7,
> "testfail" => 7,
> diff --git a/patches/patches.css b/patches/patches.css
> index 745ec75..5746057 100644
> --- a/patches/patches.css
> +++ b/patches/patches.css
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ tr.odd { background-color: #f8e8e8; }
> .sequence, .sequence :link, .sequence :visited { color: #e08000; }
> .deferred, .deferred :link, .deferred :visited { color: #e08000; }
> .testcase, .testcase :link, .testcase :visited { color: #e08000; }
> +.staging, .staging :link, .staging :visited { color: #e08000; }
> .other, .other :link, .other :visited { color: #e08000; }
> .applyfail, .applyfail :link, .applyfail :visited { color: red; }
> .buildfail, .buildfail :link, .buildfail :visited { color: red; }
> diff --git a/patches/update b/patches/update
> index 4ccc910..335af0b 100755
> --- a/patches/update
> +++ b/patches/update
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ my %status_descr =
> "depend" => "Dependency",
> "superseded" => "Superseded",
> "sequence" => "Bad sequence",
> + "staging" => "Staging",
> "testcase" => "Needs tests",
> "testfail" => "Test failure",
> );
> @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ my @legend =
> "<li>Someone else fixed the problem already.</li></ul>" ],
> [ "testcase", "<ul><li>You need to write some test cases demonstrating that the patch is correct.</li></ul>" ],
> [ "deferred", "<ul><li>The patch is deferred because of code freeze for an upcoming release. Either resend after the release, make the patch less intrusive, or make a convincing argument that it needs to be included in the release.</li></ul>" ],
> + [ "staging", "<ul><li>The patch needs more work or wider testing. Please get it in over Wine Staging.</li></ul>" ],
> [ "other", "<ul><li>The patch belongs to another WineHQ project (website, appdb, etc.) and will be applied by the respective maintainer.</li></ul>" ],
> [ "applyfail", "<ul><li>The patch got mangled in transit.</li>" .
> "<li>It's not relative to the latest git.</li>" .
> --
> 2.4.2
I'm not sure we want to encourage wine-stating from Upstream (I'm not
convinced either way), but in any case, the grammar seems wrong to me
as a native speaker, how about:
"The patch needs more work or wider testing. Please try to get into
Wine-Staging."
or something similar?
--
-Austin