wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

4 participants
84472 discussions

Re: AutoCAD2000 again and CreateFiber
by Matts 18 Aug '02

18 Aug '02

Hi! Does this mean that AutoCad 2000 works good in wine, if I set window version to win95 (which I dont see a problem with right now)? Regards Matts >Well, after the patch-hack-or whatever on VirtualQuery, AutoCAD2000 >began >coming alive ! Some problems yet, but one wonders me in particular : >setting window version as win98 or winnt40, app shows an exception >stating >that CreateFiber function is not implemented; setting as win95 the apps >starts quite well. >Any idea ? Is there some plan to implement xxxxxFiber functions, or >it's too >difficult ? >BTW, looking for help on the net, i haven't really understood the >difference >between a regular thread and a fiber (only caught that use of fibers >instead >of threads is somehow discouraged...) >Regards >Max _____________________________________________________________ Want a new web-based email account ? ---> http://www.firstlinux.net _____________________________________________________________ Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with email(a)yourgroup.org by Everyone.net http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag

3 2

gdbproxy
by Robert Lunnon 18 Aug '02

18 Aug '02

On solaris gdbproxy doesn't compile because S_un is not defined, S_un is only defined on SOlaris for XPG 4 applications. The header file however exposed _S_un so should this be _S_un or do I have to invent a new test for these features. Grabbed these comments off the net POSIX Applications that are intended to be conforming POSIX.1 applications must define the feature test macros specified by the standard before including any headers. For the stan- dards listed below, applications must define the feature test macros listed. Application writers must check the corresponding standards for other macros that can be queried to determine if desired options are supported by the imple- mentation. POSIX Standard Feature Test Macros POSIX.1-1990 _POSIX_SOURCE POSIX.1-1990 and _POSIX_SOURCE and POSIX.2-1992 C-Language _POSIX_C_SOURCE=2 Bindings Option POSIX.1b-1993 _POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L POSIX.1c-1996 _POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L X/Open CAE To build or compile an application that conforms to one of the X/Open CAE specifications, use the following guidelines. Applications need not set the POSIX feature test macros if they require both CAE and POSIX functionality. XPG3 The application must define _XOPEN_SOURCE with a value other than 500 (preferably 1). XPG4 The application must define _XOPEN_SOURCE with a value other than 500 (preferably 1) and set _XOPEN_VERSION=4. SUS (XPG4v2) The application must define _XOPEN_SOURCE with a value other than 500 (preferably 1) and set _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1. SUSv2 The application must define _XOPEN_SOURCE=500.

1 1

WINE fork and Win32api implementation
by Steven Edwards 18 Aug '02

18 Aug '02

Hola Everyone, I'm CC'ing this to wine-devel so all of the WINE devs know whats going on as they have been very nice and supporting of my work so far. As everyone knows I've been doing a lot of work with Casper, James and Jurgan on the WINE fork to windows. I've had a lot of luck and been learning alot along the way but I dont think I can contribute much more the WINE porting work at this point from the ReactOS side. As David, Eugene and Jason are makeing lots of progress on the Windowing are just a few days/weeks(?) away from having Winhello working with the new Region code, I think someone needs to take over merging and maintaining the WINE dlls. I talked to Jason about it today and we thought that Robert might want to take over for a while if he is interested because he seems to like doing a lot of the Win32 side of things. If he is not interested does anyone else want to do it? IMHO the "right" way to fork the WINE code to best suite both projects is going to have to work like this: 1. We make a set policy of when to merge. I know Jason was wanting to change the release cycle times so the merging should be cordinated with that. Mabey like 2 weeks before a new release? 2. Whoever wants to try and maintain the fork is going to need to work with Capser on keeping the w32api headers up to date. I have submitted a few minor patches but I dont have the time to do the work that is really needed. This has been one of the biggest problems so far. Having 3 sets of headers is just a pain and all of the projects seem interested in moving to one common include system. I did a little bit of work trying to get some of the WINE dlls to compile with only the mingw headers but I didnt have the time to do to much with it. 3. Keep from forking/redunancy as much as possible. It bothers me when as small as our projects are we have already manged to have so much forking in WINE, mingw and ReactOS. How many registry editors do we need? How many filemanamgers? Once again the header thing bothers me. Sorry I'm ranting. Anyways, as things move along it should get better as we will be able to share the headers, programs, and librarys with WINE and Mingw. As of right now though I dont know how much more I can do with my limited skill. So who wants to do it? In another few weeks/month we are going to need to to try and get WINEmine, notepad and win/winefile working and import shell32, comctl32 and comdlg32. I'm going to keep submitting patches to the winehq.com tree as I find fun and interesting stuff. I still want to work toward having a drop in replacement with the "bleeding edge". My hope is that ReactOS will one day work off of the stable wine 1.0 if it is ever released =) and people that want the cutting edge can build wine 1.x dlls/programs for a ReactOS system. Most of my work from now on though is going to focus documentation, testing and spreeding the word about OpenSource, ReactOS, Wine and Mingw. Thanks Steven __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com

1 0

Compilation errors when using CFLAGS=-g
by Shachar Shemesh 17 Aug '02

17 Aug '02

I did the following: make dist-clean CFLAGS=-g ./configure make depend make For some strange reason, I get the following errors: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp' gcc -o hlp2sgml hlp2sgml.o hlpfile.o hlpfile.o: In function `HLPFILE_ReadHlpFile': /home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp/hlpfile.c:205: undefined reference to `GetProcessHeap' /home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp/hlpfile.c:238: undefined reference to `GetProcessHeap' /home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp/hlpfile.c:239: undefined reference to `GetProcessHeap' /home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp/hlpfile.c:240: undefined reference to `GetProcessHeap' /home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp/hlpfile.c:241: undefined reference to `GetProcessHeap' hlpfile.o:/home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp/hlpfile.c:337: more undefined references to `GetProcessHeap' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [hlp2sgml] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp' make[1]: *** [winhelp] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/sun/sources/wine/wine/programs' make: *** [programs] Error 2 The exact same line of code failing in this file works without a problem in a hundred other places throughout the code, and when not overriding the flags (that is, if I understand correctly, when -g -O2 is used), everything is fine. Now, I don't need this file for my tests, so I just skip compiling it, but the problem is .... wierd. Anyone has any insight into it? sun@sun:~/sources/wine/wine/programs/winhelp$ cvs stat hlpfile.c =================================================================== File: hlpfile.c Status: Up-to-date Working revision: 1.9 Tue Jul 16 01:46:29 2002 Repository revision: 1.9 /home/sun/sources/wine/cvs/wine/programs/winhelp/hlpfile.c,v Sticky Tag: (none) Sticky Date: (none) Sticky Options: (none)

1 0

Re: Agent crashes on accessing Disk
by Rein Klazes 17 Aug '02

17 Aug '02

On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:40:10 +0200, you wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:45:10 +0200, Rein Klazes <rklazes(a)xs4all.nl> > wrote: > > >On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:49:45 +0200, you wrote: > > > > > >> The output from the relay messages, although voluminous, didn't > >> contain a "starting debugger" message. > > > >Probably the way I've set up the debugger here. Still you should be > >able to find the spot, accompanied by "EXC_RtlRaiseException" and > >"UnhandledExceptionFilter". I see those in the backtrace. > > hi, > Did you (or the list) get enough information from what I posted to > begin looking at the problem? Do you need a more info? > Oliver, you gave an good backtrace showing where the application crashed (function TOOLBAR_Referesh in toolbar.c around line 976). It looks like some part of the data concerning the toolbar buttons is not properly initialised (or got corrupted). Unfortunately it does not show why this happened (and why it happens with not you and not anyone else). Therefore you should try to produce the --debugmsg +relay output, and while you are at it better the --debugmsg +relay,+toolbar output. If you cannot cut this log to the interesting part, then zip or bzip2 the complete output, put it somewere on the net and give us the URL or mail it to me. I will compare your output with a similar one here, perhaps that gives some insight. When did this problem start? If by upgrading wine, which versions. Anything else changed on your system? The file dialog that crashes for you opens the last used directory. This directory can be found/inspected/changed in agent.ini. Try to change it, see if that makes a difference. Rein. -- Rein Klazes rklazes(a)xs4all.nl

1 0

[Fwd: Re: New user/developer has questions ...]
by Vincent Béron 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

Crispen, I think the list will appreciate your reply as well :) Vincent

1 0

rhlx01 cvs mirror "downtime"
by Andreas Mohr 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

Hi all, unfortunately the rhlx01 cvs mirror has been "down" for some days (no cvs syncs) due to a mail loop and thus the main admin having disabled the procmail processing. It should be properly updating the mirror again now that I've fixed my BROKEN mail processing ;-) Let me know if it's still broken for some reason. -- Andreas Mohr Stauferstr. 6, D-71272 Renningen, Germany Tel. +49 7159 800604 http://mohr.de.tt

1 0

right way to compile wine with a "buildroot" DESTDIR is missing
by Raul Dias 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

Hi, I have been building wine RPMs for some time now. The way I do is to specify the correct paths to ./configure script (like prefix, mandir, bindir, ...). After building I have to use an ugly make install in orther to install it into another dir that is different from the one. However, talking to some wine developers on #winehq in openprojects network. They state that a ./configure --prefix=<you buildroot>/prefix was enough. That's because wine does not hardcode any %prefix related path. This would simplify a lot the process. However I just checked that wine does hardcode the %prefix dir in the binaries. This is done in dlls/ntdll/ntdll.dll.so and possible at miscemu/wine . AFAIU, this is done to keep the path to the global registries which is the Right Thing to do. So what I really would like to know is which way is the right way to install wine in a dir different than %prefix or /usr/local (default %prefix)? Is there any chance to get a DESTDIR implemented in the Makefiles? []'s Raul Dias

4 12

microsoft CFileDialog problem
by mayonaise＠beer.com 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

hi everybody, i am currently working on making a windows program function in wine. it works for the most part, so i'm trying to iron out a few critical bugs. first off... i'm looking at microsoft's CFileDialog class - it is what the standard windows 'open file' and 'save file' dialog windows use. the problem is this: CFileDialog has a built in function called OnFolderChange, that is used to determine whether the user has changed folders in the dialog, whether by double click or what not.. the program i'm working on overrides the CFileDialog class, and includes more code for the OnFolderChange function (and for other functions) for its own purposes. the new OnFolderChange function works perfectly fine in windows, but is completely ignored when using wine - it never even gets called, while the rest of the dialog window retains all of its intended functionality. as a reference, the built in functions OnFileNameChange, GetFolderPath, and others gets overridden successfully. as far as i can tell, the only function that is not working properly is the OnFolderChange function. the overriding of CFileDialog was accomplished by using a hooking procedure provided in the MSDN library. i hope this is enough information, however i don't expect anyone to fully be able to address this issue without seeing the code i'm working on first.thank you for your time! -kyle

2 1

note to packagers (new optional dependancy)
by Shachar Shemesh 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

Hi all, A patch just submitted to wine-patches changes the rules when building binary packages of WINE for distributions. This is an optional change, so ignoring this email will not break anything, but will result in decreased functionality. During the configure phase ./configure will now check for the availability of the libfribidi header files. These are typically distributed in a package called "libfribidi-dev". I would highly recommend installing this library on the machine you compile the package on, so as to include the option for BiDi support in the resulting binary. If the headers are found during compile time, a run time check is performed whether the libfribidi library is available. If it is not, Wine will continue without BiDi support. If it is, BiDi support will (at some future date, admitably) be enabled. In .deb speak, libfribidi-dev is build recommended for wine src. libfribidi is suggested for wine. Shachar

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel