wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

4 participants
84472 discussions

RE: New user/developer has questions ...
by Medland, Bill 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: Crispen Scott [mailto:C.Scott@astronautics.com] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:56 AM > To: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: New user/developer has questions ... > > > I have just RPMed wine-20020512-1.i386.rpm and attempted to > run several WIN > programs (to wit: sol.exe and a proprietary package). > Both fail. I am including the entire run/error message from > my attempt to run > sol.exe below. Being new to WINE, I have no idea where > to begin to find the problem. I have annotated the error > message with notes. > All notes are separated by a > > <NOTE - TEXT> then a CR and follows the line(s) that the NOTE > applies to. > > [root@localhost root]# wine /mnt/windows/windows/system32/sol.exe > <NOTE - This is the command line entry > > > err:reg:_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format unable to load > native win95 > registry file C:\WINDOWS\system.dat: unknown signature. > err:reg:_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format Unable to load > native win95 > registry file C:\WINDOWS\system.dat. > err:reg:_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format Please report to > a.mohr(a)mailto.de. > err:reg:_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format Make a backup > of the file, run > a good reg cleaner program and try again! > <NOTE - The SYSTEM.DAT file located in the windows SUBDIR was > exported from > regedit.exe. This is from a WIN2K OS > That's your mistake. You shouldn't export it. reg_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format actually reads the files that store a Win95 registry (the actual files, not exports). > > fixme:win32:PE_CreateModule Security directory ignored > <NOTE - I assume this is a FIXME in the SRC> True > > err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file > "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/desktop.ini" err = 55 > <NOTE - This file exists in the proper location so what is the error?> I don't know the font stuff; someone else maybe will help here. > > err:font:AddFontFileToList Already loaded font L"Garamond" L"Bold" > err:font:AddFontFileToList Already loaded font L"Garamond" L"Italic" > err:font:AddFontFileToList Already loaded font L"Garamond" L"Regular" > > err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file > "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/modern.fon" err = 2 > err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file > "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/mtsorts.ttf" err = 2 > err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file > "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/roman.fon" err = 2 > err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file > "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/script.fon" err = 2 > <NOTE - These files exist so why are they able to be loaded?> > > X Error of failed request: XF86DGANoDirectVideoMode > Major opcode of failed request: 136 (XFree86-DGA) > Minor opcode of failed request: 22 (XDGAOpenFramebuffer) > Serial number of failed request: 181 > Current serial number in output stream: 181 > <NOTE - What does this indicate?> > > I am trying to come up to speed on the use of WINE but, as > everyone knows, > the documentation is a little light > as is the commenting of the source code. If someone could > please head me in > the right direction, I would greatly appreciate it. > > Once I have gained some additional expertise in WINE I will > use my 15+ years > of Windows development experience and knowledge > to try and resolve some of the issues and bugs that are > reported. This may > take me several more weeks. > > I am also intending to write a technical book on WINE so will > submit chapters > for review to the community as the become available. > Much of the information will deal with the issues the I, as a > newbie, am > encountering. > > I await the response. > > Crispen Scott > > BTW: I downloaded the source for 20020804 and, after fixing > several build > related problems (incorrect build order, root objections, & > eliminating > programs with build problems I couldn't readily resolve, i.e. > widl), I had > even worse problems with trying to get that version of wine > to run. That is > why I reverted to the latest RPM version. Some of the > problems with the > 20020804 build might be resolved after I see the answers to > the problems I > stated above. > > I am excited about becoming an integral part of this > community but need some > start-up help! > Thanks! > > -- > Crispen Scott > Engineer - Software > Astronautics.com > 4115 Teutonia Road > Milwaukee, WI 53209 > Tel: 414-447-8200 x4434 > C.Scott(a)Astronautics.com > What is your environment; you shouldn't have had all those build problems. Bill

4 3

RFC: winedefault.reg
by lawson_whitney＠juno.com 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

Good day! Should we maybe install it somewhere in --prefix so it has a chance to get included in binary packages? I have one in /usr/local, but it is from April 19, 2001 and not much use... Lawson ---oops---

2 1

RE: window parent/owner handling
by Medland, Bill 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Timoshkov [mailto:dmitry@baikal.ru] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:22 PM > To: Medland, Bill > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: Re: window parent/owner handling > > > "Medland, Bill" <Bill.Medland(a)accpac.com> wrote: > > > Includes my previous patch for SetWindowLong (for Bug 825) > > Seems that your investigations are correct, at least test succeeds > under win2000. I would suggest to apply tiny patch (attached) to catch > some additional problems. Thanks Dmitry; for all your help on this. p.s. I suddenly realised I'd put only my name on the copyright in the test. It's based on your code; You want to be mentioned? (Or is this sufficient ackowledgement?). > > -- > Dmitry. > Bill

2 1

FW: what's with WS_OVERLAPPED?
by Medland, Bill 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

(Damn; Outlook bugs me) -----Original Message----- From: Medland, Bill Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 8:19 AM To: 'rolf.kalbermatter(a)citeng.com' Subject: RE: what's with WS_OVERLAPPED? > -----Original Message----- > From: Rolf Kalbermatter [mailto:r.kalbermatter@hccnet.nl] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:31 PM > To: Bill.Medland(a)accpac.com > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: RE: what's with WS_OVERLAPPED? > > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 "Medland, Bill" <Bill.Medland(a)accpac.com> wrote > > > >> On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Ove Kaaven [mailto:ovehk@ping.uio.no] > wrote: > > <snip> > > >> WS_OVERLAPPED is in practice considered the absence of the > >> WS_POPUP and > >> WS_CHILD flags, I believe. > > > >Thanks Ove; that'll do for a working hypothesis. (I wish > Microsoft would > be > >consistant) > > > >Just for the record it is clearly more complex than that. I > guess since > >Microsoft wrote it we can trust Spy++ a little. I have seen > spy++ declare > >that a "tooltips" class window (style 0x84800000/00000088) has style > >WS_OVERLAPPED whereas a "tooltips_class32" class window (style > >0x84800003/00000088) doesn't. > > Hmm, this is just a wild guess but couldn't it be that the > WS_OVERLAPPED > style applies only to the lower word of the windows style. > Windows coming > from 16bit DOS it wouldn't be surprising if the original > windows style was > 16 bit only as well. Either that or Spy++ has a bug, even > though you trust > it so much ;-). Except all the general style stuff is in the top word; the only difference between the two styles, the 3, is two TTS_* toolbar style; generally the stuff in the low word is, I believe, control-specific. I honestly think that it is not so much that Spy++ has a bug as that it is based on some knowledge within Microsoft that describes how they have worked around the mess they have generated over the years. > > Rolf Kalbermatter > mailto:rolf.kalbermatter@citeng.com > > Bill

1 0

New user/developer has questions ...
by Crispen Scott 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

I have just RPMed wine-20020512-1.i386.rpm and attempted to run several WIN programs (to wit: sol.exe and a proprietary package). Both fail. I am including the entire run/error message from my attempt to run sol.exe below. Being new to WINE, I have no idea where to begin to find the problem. I have annotated the error message with notes. All notes are separated by a <NOTE - TEXT> then a CR and follows the line(s) that the NOTE applies to. [root@localhost root]# wine /mnt/windows/windows/system32/sol.exe <NOTE - This is the command line entry > err:reg:_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format unable to load native win95 registry file C:\WINDOWS\system.dat: unknown signature. err:reg:_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format Unable to load native win95 registry file C:\WINDOWS\system.dat. err:reg:_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format Please report to a.mohr(a)mailto.de. err:reg:_convert_win95_registry_to_wine_format Make a backup of the file, run a good reg cleaner program and try again! <NOTE - The SYSTEM.DAT file located in the windows SUBDIR was exported from regedit.exe. This is from a WIN2K OS > fixme:win32:PE_CreateModule Security directory ignored <NOTE - I assume this is a FIXME in the SRC> err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/desktop.ini" err = 55 <NOTE - This file exists in the proper location so what is the error?> err:font:AddFontFileToList Already loaded font L"Garamond" L"Bold" err:font:AddFontFileToList Already loaded font L"Garamond" L"Italic" err:font:AddFontFileToList Already loaded font L"Garamond" L"Regular" err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/modern.fon" err = 2 err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/mtsorts.ttf" err = 2 err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/roman.fon" err = 2 err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font file "/mnt/windows/windows/Fonts/script.fon" err = 2 <NOTE - These files exist so why are they able to be loaded?> X Error of failed request: XF86DGANoDirectVideoMode Major opcode of failed request: 136 (XFree86-DGA) Minor opcode of failed request: 22 (XDGAOpenFramebuffer) Serial number of failed request: 181 Current serial number in output stream: 181 <NOTE - What does this indicate?> I am trying to come up to speed on the use of WINE but, as everyone knows, the documentation is a little light as is the commenting of the source code. If someone could please head me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate it. Once I have gained some additional expertise in WINE I will use my 15+ years of Windows development experience and knowledge to try and resolve some of the issues and bugs that are reported. This may take me several more weeks. I am also intending to write a technical book on WINE so will submit chapters for review to the community as the become available. Much of the information will deal with the issues the I, as a newbie, am encountering. I await the response. Crispen Scott BTW: I downloaded the source for 20020804 and, after fixing several build related problems (incorrect build order, root objections, & eliminating programs with build problems I couldn't readily resolve, i.e. widl), I had even worse problems with trying to get that version of wine to run. That is why I reverted to the latest RPM version. Some of the problems with the 20020804 build might be resolved after I see the answers to the problems I stated above. I am excited about becoming an integral part of this community but need some start-up help! Thanks! -- Crispen Scott Engineer - Software Astronautics.com 4115 Teutonia Road Milwaukee, WI 53209 Tel: 414-447-8200 x4434 C.Scott(a)Astronautics.com

2 1

RE: what's with WS_OVERLAPPED?
by Rolf Kalbermatter 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 "Medland, Bill" <Bill.Medland(a)accpac.com> wrote > >> On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Ove Kaaven [mailto:ovehk@ping.uio.no] wrote: <snip> >> WS_OVERLAPPED is in practice considered the absence of the >> WS_POPUP and >> WS_CHILD flags, I believe. > >Thanks Ove; that'll do for a working hypothesis. (I wish Microsoft would be >consistant) > >Just for the record it is clearly more complex than that. I guess since >Microsoft wrote it we can trust Spy++ a little. I have seen spy++ declare >that a "tooltips" class window (style 0x84800000/00000088) has style >WS_OVERLAPPED whereas a "tooltips_class32" class window (style >0x84800003/00000088) doesn't. Hmm, this is just a wild guess but couldn't it be that the WS_OVERLAPPED style applies only to the lower word of the windows style. Windows coming from 16bit DOS it wouldn't be surprising if the original windows style was 16 bit only as well. Either that or Spy++ has a bug, even though you trust it so much ;-). Rolf Kalbermatter mailto:rolf.kalbermatter@citeng.com

1 0

Re: wine/ dlls/gdi/Makefile.in dlls/gdi/bidi16.c d ...
by Dimitrie O. Paun 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

On August 15, 2002 08:42 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: [...] > Log message: > Moved a large number of 16-bit functions to a separate gdi16.c file. This is a great idea that I've been advocating for a loooong time now <g>. I think moving 16 bit code into separate files is cool: -- runtime efficiency: If 16 bit code is not invoked, it's not going to be paged in during execution -- code neatness: developers working on the 32-bit code (which is _the_ code in Wine) will not get distracted by silly 16-to-32-to-16 bit conversions. -- helps correctness: 16-bit code is in general a simple: 16-to-32 bit conversion call the 32-bit equivalent function 32-to-16 bit conversion Which means there is a lot of repetition, template-like coding. Any departure from the usual pattern is a *lot* more easily spotted by the naked eye if it's present in a file that does just that. -- 16-to-32 bit: we can more easily see (and fix) cases where 32 bit code calls 16 bit code. For all these reasons, I think we should have _all_ 16-bit code into separate files. Always. Who knows, maybe we can have makefiles done such a way that we can avoid compiling 16 bit code altogether! :) Even if only as a simple check that no 32 bit code calls down to 16 bit... And again, the _same_ rationale applies to xxxW & xxxA functions, but I'll not pursue this point for now ;). -- Dimi.

1 0

Re: window parent/owner handling
by Dmitry Timoshkov 16 Aug '02

16 Aug '02

"Medland, Bill" <Bill.Medland(a)accpac.com> wrote: > Includes my previous patch for SetWindowLong (for Bug 825) Seems that your investigations are correct, at least test succeeds under win2000. I would suggest to apply tiny patch (attached) to catch some additional problems. -- Dmitry.

1 0

RE: Some observations on window parentage etc.
by Medland, Bill 15 Aug '02

15 Aug '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: Medland, Bill [mailto:Bill.Medland@accpac.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:59 AM > To: Wine devel (E-mail) > Subject: Some observations on window parentage etc. > > > Here are some observations with regard to Window > parentage/ownership etc. snip > > More to follow. > > Bill > OK guys; who can justify the claim in the server (set_window_owner) that the owner and the window must have the same parent? I think it is untrue, but I don't know what it should be. I believe we need to extend the WIN_SetOwner to return the previous owner. Should we take that out of the structure on the user side or should we modify the server reply to return it? I guess modifying the server reply is the safer option and should have no performance penalty. So here is what I am looking at doing. (I'd prefer comments here rather than after I submit the patch) 1. Modify the set_window_owner reply to return both the new full handle and the previous full handle. (p.s. what is this full handle anyway? Why is it different from the one passed in the request?) 2. Modify the set_window_owner handler to fill in the reply and also remove the parent test (or replace it with anything you guys think makes sense) 3. Modify WIN_SetOwner to return the value 4. Leave GetParent as it is 5. Modify GetWindowLong (GWL_HWNDPARENT to return the parent if a WS_CHILD and the owner otherwise (even if not a WS_POPUP) 6. Modify GetAncestor (GA_ROOTWINDOW) to return the same as recursing on GetParent. 7. Write a test set. Comments? Bill

1 0

RE: Re:can windows be reparented?
by Medland, Bill 15 Aug '02

15 Aug '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Timoshkov [mailto:dmitry@baikal.ru] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:00 AM > To: Medland, Bill > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: Re: Re:can windows be reparented? > > > "Medland, Bill" <Bill.Medland(a)accpac.com> wrote: > > > (Do you want the test case code?) > > Why not? :-) > > -- > Dmitry. > > > First is without WS_POPUP, second is with

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel