wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

3 participants
84400 discussions

16 bit menus
by lawson_whitney＠juno.com 17 Jan '02

17 Jan '02

Good day! Last time but one I tested juno 1.49 for regressions in 16 bit comms, it downloaded a new list of access numbers. Next it presented me with the attached menu (well, I attached a trace of it making the menu), which it expects me to work through and select a new number. Unfortunately, the menu seems to be either 0 or 1 pixels high and I can't find any of the controls in there. If somebody can tell me what parameter to what function provokes this, maybe I can work out a way to fix it. Of course, anybody who knows what [s]he is doing with menus is welcome to fix it, too. I have used this menu with this app, but not for perhaps a year. Lawson

1 0

[PATCH] Overlapped recv(), WSARecv()
by Martin Wilck 17 Jan '02

17 Jan '02

This patch needs testing yet - I am sending it for people to review and point out errors right from the start. Currently I only verified that it compiles. ChangeLog: implement overlapped recv(), much like overlapped IO in files/file.c. make WS2_32 WSARecvFrom() the "working" function, all others are wrappers only. implement WSAGetOverlappedResult(). NOTE: My patches submitted yesterday and today (16/01) to wine-patches are necessary for this one to work. CVS base version is 2002-01-15. Martin -- Martin Wilck Phone: +49 5251 8 15113 Fujitsu Siemens Computers Fax: +49 5251 8 20409 Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1 mailto:Martin.Wilck@Fujitsu-Siemens.com D-33106 Paderborn http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/primergy diff -ruX diffignore CVS/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c MW/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c --- CVS/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c Wed Jan 16 18:14:19 2002 +++ MW/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c Wed Jan 16 18:18:27 2002 @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ #include "wine/winbase16.h" #include "wingdi.h" #include "winuser.h" +#include "winerror.h" #include "winsock2.h" #include "ws2tcpip.h" #include "wsipx.h" @@ -95,7 +96,6 @@ #include "file.h" #include "debugtools.h" - DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(winsock); /* critical section to protect some non-rentrant net function */ @@ -167,11 +167,22 @@ if ( !as->user_overlapped ) HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, as->overlapped ); + else + /* FIXME: is this correct? How else can we communicate the flags + to WSAGetOverlappedResult() ? */ + as->overlapped->Offset = as->flags; HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, as->iovec ); HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, as ); } +static void CALLBACK ws2_default_completion ( DWORD dwError, DWORD cbTransferred, + LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, + DWORD dwFlags ) +{ + NtSetEvent ( lpOverlapped->hEvent, NULL ); +} + /****************************************************************/ /* ----------------------------------- internal data */ @@ -307,14 +318,19 @@ static char* check_buffer(int size); -static int _get_sock_fd(SOCKET s) +static int _get_sock_fd_type (SOCKET s, enum fd_type *type, DWORD *flags) { - int fd = FILE_GetUnixHandle( s, GENERIC_READ ); + int fd = FILE_GetUnixHandleType ( s, GENERIC_READ, type, flags ); if (fd == -1) FIXME("handle %d is not a socket (GLE %ld)\n",s,GetLastError()); return fd; } +static int _get_sock_fd (SOCKET s) +{ + return _get_sock_fd_type (s, NULL, NULL); +} + static void _enable_event(SOCKET s, unsigned int event, unsigned int sstate, unsigned int cstate) { @@ -1887,34 +1903,16 @@ */ int WINAPI WS_recv(SOCKET s, char *buf, int len, int flags) { - int fd = _get_sock_fd(s); + DWORD n; + WSABUF wsabuf = { len, buf }; + DWORD dwFlags = flags; TRACE("socket %04x, buf %8x, len %d, flags %d\n", s, (unsigned)buf, len, flags); - if (fd != -1) - { - INT length; - - if (_is_blocking(s)) - { - /* block here */ - /* FIXME: OOB and exceptfds? */ - do_block(fd, 1); - } - if ((length = recv(fd, buf, len, flags)) >= 0) - { - TRACE(" -> %i bytes\n", length); - - close(fd); - _enable_event(s, FD_READ, 0, 0); - return length; - } - SetLastError(wsaErrno()); - close(fd); - } - else SetLastError(WSAENOTSOCK); - WARN(" -> ERROR\n"); - return SOCKET_ERROR; + if ( WSARecv (s, &wsabuf, 1, &n, &dwFlags, NULL, NULL) == SOCKET_ERROR ) + return SOCKET_ERROR; + else + return n; } /*********************************************************************** @@ -1932,60 +1930,14 @@ int WINAPI WS_recvfrom(SOCKET s, char *buf, INT len, int flags, struct WS_sockaddr *from, int *fromlen) { - int fd = _get_sock_fd(s); - int res; - - TRACE("socket %04x, ptr %08x, len %d, flags %d\n", s, (unsigned)buf, len, flags); -#if DEBUG_SOCKADDR - if (from) - dump_sockaddr(from); - else - DPRINTF("from = NULL\n"); -#endif + DWORD n; + WSABUF wsabuf = { len, buf }; + DWORD dwFlags = flags; - res=SOCKET_ERROR; - if (fd != -1) - { - struct sockaddr* uaddr; - int uaddrlen; - int length; - - if (_is_blocking(s)) - { - /* block here */ - /* FIXME: OOB and exceptfds */ - do_block(fd, 1); - } - - uaddr=ws_sockaddr_alloc(from,fromlen,&uaddrlen); - length=recvfrom(fd, buf, len, flags, uaddr, &uaddrlen); - if (length < 0) - { - SetLastError(wsaErrno()); - WARN(" -> ERROR\n"); - } - else if (ws_sockaddr_u2ws(uaddr,uaddrlen,from,fromlen) != 0) - { - /* The from buffer was too small, but we read the data - * anyway. Is that really bad? - */ - SetLastError(WSAEFAULT); - WARN(" -> WSAEFAULT\n"); - } - else - { - TRACE(" -> %i bytes\n", length); - _enable_event(s, FD_READ, 0, 0); - res=length; - } - close(fd); - } + if ( WSARecvFrom (s, &wsabuf, 1, &n, &dwFlags, from, fromlen, NULL, NULL) == SOCKET_ERROR ) + return SOCKET_ERROR; else - { - SetLastError(WSAENOTSOCK); - WARN(" -> WSAENOTSOCK\n"); - } - return res; + return n; } /*********************************************************************** @@ -2811,6 +2763,44 @@ return SOCKET_ERROR; } +/********************************************************************** + * WSAGetOverlappedResult (WS2_32.40) + */ +BOOL WINAPI WSAGetOverlappedResult ( SOCKET s, LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, + LPDWORD lpcbTransfer, BOOL fWait, + LPDWORD lpdwFlags ) +{ + DWORD r; + + TRACE ( "socket %d ovl %p trans %p, wait %d flags %p\n", + s, lpOverlapped, lpcbTransfer, fWait, lpdwFlags ); + + if ( !(lpOverlapped && lpOverlapped->hEvent) ) + { + ERR ( "Invalid pointer\n" ); + WSASetLastError (WSA_INVALID_PARAMETER); + return FALSE; + } + + do { + TRACE("waiting on %p\n",lpOverlapped); + r = WaitForSingleObjectEx (lpOverlapped->hEvent, fWait ? INFINITE : 0, TRUE); + TRACE("wait on %p returned %ld\n",lpOverlapped,r); + } while (r == STATUS_USER_APC); + + if ( lpcbTransfer ) + *lpcbTransfer = lpOverlapped->InternalHigh; + + if ( lpdwFlags ) + *lpdwFlags = lpOverlapped->Offset; /* see ws2_async_call_completion */ + + if (lpOverlapped->Internal == STATUS_PENDING ) + WSASetLastError ( WSA_IO_INCOMPLETE ); + + return (r == WAIT_OBJECT_0); +} + + /*********************************************************************** * WINSOCK_DoAsyncSelect */ @@ -3481,34 +3471,267 @@ /*********************************************************************** + * WSARecv (WS2_32.67) + */ +int WINAPI WSARecv (SOCKET s, LPWSABUF lpBuffers, DWORD dwBufferCount, + LPDWORD NumberOfBytesReceived, LPDWORD lpFlags, + LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, + LPWSAOVERLAPPED_COMPLETION_ROUTINE lpCompletionRoutine) +{ + + return WSARecvFrom (s, lpBuffers, dwBufferCount, NumberOfBytesReceived, lpFlags, + NULL, NULL, lpOverlapped, lpCompletionRoutine); + +} + +/*********************************************************************** + * WS2_recv (INTERNAL) + */ +static int WS2_recv (int fd, struct iovec* iov, int count, + struct WS_sockaddr *lpFrom, LPINT lpFromlen, LPDWORD lpFlags) +{ + /* Uses recvmsg() in order to provide scatter-gather I/O */ + struct msghdr hdr; + int n; + TRACE ( "fd %d, iovec %p, count %d addr %p, len %p, flags %lx\n", + fd, iov, count, lpFrom, lpFromlen, *lpFlags); + + hdr.msg_name = NULL; + + if ( lpFrom ) + { +#if DEBUG_SOCKADDR + dump_sockaddr (lpFrom); +#endif + + hdr.msg_namelen = *lpFromlen; + hdr.msg_name = ws_sockaddr_alloc (lpFrom, lpFromlen, &hdr.msg_namelen); + if ( !hdr.msg_name ) + { + WSASetLastError ( WSAENOBUFS ); + n = -1; + goto out; + } + } + else + hdr.msg_namelen = 0; + + hdr.msg_iov = iov; + hdr.msg_iovlen = count; + hdr.msg_control = NULL; + hdr.msg_controllen = 0; + hdr.msg_flags = 0; + + if ( (n = recvmsg (fd, &hdr, *lpFlags)) == -1 ) + goto out; + + if ( lpFrom && + ws_sockaddr_u2ws ( hdr.msg_name, hdr.msg_namelen, + lpFrom, lpFromlen ) != 0 ) + { + /* The from buffer was too small, but we read the data + * anyway. Is that really bad? + */ + WSASetLastError ( WSAEFAULT ); + WARN ( "Address buffer too small\n" ); + } + +out: + TRACE ( "recvmsg returned %d\n", n ); + + ws_sockaddr_free ( hdr.msg_name, lpFrom ); + return n; +} + + +/*********************************************************************** + * WS2_async_recv (INTERNAL) + */ +static void WS2_async_recv (async_private *as) +{ + ws2_async* wsa = (ws2_async*) as; + int result, err; + + TRACE ( "async %p\n", wsa ); + + result = WS2_recv ( wsa->async.fd, wsa->iovec, wsa->n_iovecs, + wsa->addr, wsa->addrlen, &wsa->flags ); + + if (result >= 0) + { + wsa->overlapped->Internal = STATUS_SUCCESS; + wsa->overlapped->InternalHigh = result; + TRACE ( "received %d bytes\n", result ); + return; + } + + err = errno; + if ( err == EAGAIN || err == EINTR ) + { + wsa->overlapped->Internal = STATUS_PENDING; + TRACE ( "still pending\n" ); + } + else + { + wsa->overlapped->Internal = STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL; + TRACE ( "Error: %d\n", errno ); + } +} + +/*********************************************************************** * WSARecvFrom (WS2_32.69) */ INT WINAPI WSARecvFrom( SOCKET s, LPWSABUF lpBuffers, DWORD dwBufferCount, - LPDWORD lpNumberOfBytesRecvd, LPDWORD lpFlags, struct WS_sockaddr *lpFrom, - LPINT lpFromlen, LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, + LPDWORD lpNumberOfBytesRecvd, LPDWORD lpFlags, + struct WS_sockaddr *lpFrom, LPINT lpFromlen, + LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, LPWSAOVERLAPPED_COMPLETION_ROUTINE lpCompletionRoutine ) { - DWORD dwCount; - INT rc; + struct iovec* iovec; + int fd, i, length, err = WSAENOTSOCK; + enum fd_type type; + DWORD flags; + ws2_async *wsa; + + fd = _get_sock_fd_type (s, &type, &flags); + + TRACE("socket %04x, wsabuf %p, nbufs %ld, flags %ld, from %p, " + "fromlen %ld, ovl %p, func %p, fd %d, type %d, flags %ld\n", + s, lpBuffers, dwBufferCount, *lpFlags, lpFrom, + (lpFromlen ? *lpFromlen : -1L), + lpOverlapped, lpCompletionRoutine, + fd, (int) type, flags); - FIXME( "(%i,%p,%lu,%p,%p,%p,%p,%p,%p: stub\n", - s, lpBuffers, dwBufferCount, lpNumberOfBytesRecvd, lpFlags, - lpFrom, lpFromlen, lpOverlapped, lpCompletionRoutine ); + if (fd == -1) + { + err = WSAENOTSOCK; + goto error; + } - for( dwCount = 0, rc = 0; dwCount < dwBufferCount; dwCount++ ) - { + iovec = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), 0, + dwBufferCount * sizeof (struct iovec) ); + if ( !iovec ) + { + err = WSAENOBUFS; + goto err_close; + } - if( ( rc = WS_recvfrom(s, lpBuffers[ dwCount ].buf, (INT)lpBuffers[ dwCount ].len, - (INT)*lpFlags, lpFrom, lpFromlen ) ) != 0 ) + for (i = 0; i < dwBufferCount; i++) { - break; + iovec[i].iov_base = lpBuffers[i].buf; + iovec[i].iov_len = lpBuffers[i].len; } - } + if ( (lpOverlapped || lpCompletionRoutine) && flags & FD_FLAG_OVERLAPPED ) + { + /* Asynchronous recv */ - return rc; -} + wsa = HeapAlloc ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, sizeof (ws2_async) ); + if ( !wsa ) + { + err = WSAENOBUFS; + goto err_free; + } + + wsa->async.ops = &ws2_async_ops; + wsa->async.handle = (HANDLE) s; + wsa->async.fd = fd; + wsa->async.type = ASYNC_TYPE_READ; + wsa->async.func = WS2_async_recv; + wsa->user_overlapped = lpOverlapped; + if ( lpOverlapped ) + wsa->overlapped = lpOverlapped; + else + { + wsa->overlapped = HeapAlloc ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, + sizeof (WSAOVERLAPPED) ); + if ( !wsa->overlapped ) + { + err = WSAENOBUFS; + goto err_free_as; + } + } + wsa->completion_func = ( lpCompletionRoutine ? + lpCompletionRoutine : ws2_default_completion ); + wsa->iovec = iovec; + wsa->n_iovecs = dwBufferCount; + wsa->addr = lpFrom; + wsa->addrlen = lpFromlen; + wsa->flags = *lpFlags; + + wsa->overlapped->Internal = STATUS_USER_APC; + wsa->overlapped->InternalHigh = 0; + TRACE ( "async %p, overlapped: %p, user overlapped: %p, completion: %p\n", + wsa, wsa->overlapped, wsa->user_overlapped, wsa->completion_func ); + + if ( !register_async ( &wsa->async ) ) + { + err = wsaErrno (); + goto err_free_ov; + } + + /* Check for immediate completion + (only possible if lpOverlapped is non-NULL) */ + if ( !lpOverlapped ) + { + WSASetLastError ( WSA_IO_PENDING ); + return SOCKET_ERROR; + } + else if ( WSAGetOverlappedResult ( (HANDLE) s, lpOverlapped, + lpNumberOfBytesRecvd, FALSE, lpFlags) ) + { + return 0; + } + else if ( WSAGetLastError () == WSA_IO_INCOMPLETE ) + { + WSASetLastError ( WSA_IO_PENDING ); + return SOCKET_ERROR; + } + else + goto err_free_ov; + } + + /* Synchronous recv */ + + if (_is_blocking(s)) + { + /* block here */ + /* FIXME: OOB and exceptfds? */ + do_block(fd, 1); + } + + length = WS2_recv ( fd, iovec, dwBufferCount, lpFrom, lpFromlen, lpFlags ); + if ( length == -1 ) + { + err = wsaErrno(); + goto err_free; + } + + TRACE(" -> %i bytes\n", length); + + *lpNumberOfBytesRecvd = length; + + WS_FREE (iovec); + close(fd); + _enable_event(s, FD_READ, 0, 0); + + return 0; + +err_free_ov: + if ( !wsa->user_overlapped ) + HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, wsa->overlapped ); +err_free_as: + HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, wsa ); +err_free: + WS_FREE (iovec); +err_close: + close (fd); +error: + WARN(" -> ERROR %d\n", err); + SetLastError ( err ); + return SOCKET_ERROR; +} /*********************************************************************** * WSCInstallProvider (WS2_32.88) diff -ruX diffignore CVS/wine/dlls/winsock/ws2_32.spec MW/wine/dlls/winsock/ws2_32.spec --- CVS/wine/dlls/winsock/ws2_32.spec Tue Jan 15 20:17:38 2002 +++ MW/wine/dlls/winsock/ws2_32.spec Wed Jan 16 18:13:36 2002 @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ 37 stub WSAEnumProtocolsA 38 stub WSAEnumProtocolsW 39 stdcall WSAEventSelect(long long long) WSAEventSelect -40 stub WSAGetOverlappedResult +40 stdcall WSAGetOverlappedResult(long ptr ptr long ptr) WSAGetOverlappedResult 41 stub WSAGetQOSByName 42 stub WSAGetServiceClassInfoA 43 stub WSAGetServiceClassInfoW @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ 64 stub WSANtohl 65 stub WSANtohs 66 stub WSAProviderConfigChange -67 stub WSARecv +67 stdcall WSARecv(long ptr long ptr ptr ptr ptr) WSARecv 68 stub WSARecvDisconnect 69 stdcall WSARecvFrom(long ptr long ptr ptr ptr ptr ptr ptr ) WSARecvFrom 70 stub WSARemoveServiceClass diff -ruX diffignore CVS/wine/files/file.c MW/wine/files/file.c --- CVS/wine/files/file.c Wed Jan 16 18:14:09 2002 +++ MW/wine/files/file.c Wed Jan 16 17:34:34 2002 @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ * Retrieve the Unix handle corresponding to a file handle. * Returns -1 on failure. */ -static int FILE_GetUnixHandleType( HANDLE handle, DWORD access, enum fd_type *type, DWORD *flags ) +int FILE_GetUnixHandleType( HANDLE handle, DWORD access, enum fd_type *type, DWORD *flags ) { int ret, fd = -1; diff -ruX diffignore CVS/wine/include/file.h MW/wine/include/file.h --- CVS/wine/include/file.h Wed Jan 16 18:14:04 2002 +++ MW/wine/include/file.h Wed Jan 16 18:15:12 2002 @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ #include "winbase.h" #include "wine/windef16.h" /* HFILE16 */ +/* FIXME: including server/protocol.h here leads to a handle_t type conflict elsewhere */ +enum fd_type; /* declared in server_protocol.h */ + #define MAX_PATHNAME_LEN 1024 /* Definition of a full DOS file name */ @@ -97,6 +100,7 @@ extern int FILE_strncasecmp( const char *str1, const char *str2, int len ); extern void FILE_SetDosError(void); extern HANDLE FILE_DupUnixHandle( int fd, DWORD access, BOOL inherit ); +extern int FILE_GetUnixHandleType ( HANDLE handle, DWORD access, enum fd_type *type, DWORD *flags ); extern int FILE_GetUnixHandle( HANDLE handle, DWORD access ); extern BOOL FILE_Stat( LPCSTR unixName, BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION *info ); extern HFILE16 FILE_Dup2( HFILE16 hFile1, HFILE16 hFile2 );

2 1

Re: SHGetSpecialFolderLocation function
by juergen.schmied＠debitel.net 17 Jan '02

17 Jan '02

> What I've found though with the SHGetSpecialFolderLocation, is that it seems > to me that it is designed to allow the caller to pick an arbitrary value for > the CSIDL, and that this will cause windows to create a new CSIDL. As the > function's implementation currently stands, it has a hard-coded table of > possible CSIDLs, and rejects calls with unknown CSIDLs. This is right. There is a list with valid CSIDL's. These CSIDL's are mapped to a unique value name in the registry. These functions are supposed to fail when called with a CSIDL which is not predefined. (Whats not saying wine knows all CSIDL's). > Has anyone else looked at this function, and does anyone have any comments or > suggestions on ways to address this? I'm thinking that these values probably > need to go into the registry, or something, rather than being stored in the > code... There is only a need to store the values in the registry when the path is different from the default value. If the there are no registry entrys in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ Explorer\Shell Folders HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ Explorer\User Shell Folders HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Explorer\Sh ell Folders HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Explorer\Us er Shell Folders the the default values are used. (Was in w95, nt4 like this. Don't know it its true for w2k since apparently most values are set at installation time and there are more values used than before.) Last but the not least: the current implementation was designed to work without much preset values in the registry to simplify the installation. The implementation should be cleaned up starting with ShGetFolderLocation since this is the common base of SHGetFolderLocation, SHGetFolderPath, SHGetSpecialFolderLocationand SHGetSpecialFolderPath and you should have a fallback to deal with a empty registry. (I'm not up to date with the wine installation procedure but the installer would have to put many keys in the registry for a good shell32 konfiguration.) Juergen --- juergen.schmied(a)debitel.net

1 0

Re: [PATCH] Overlapped recv(), WSARecv()
by lawson_whitney＠juno.com 16 Jan '02

16 Jan '02

> > This patch needs testing yet - I am sending it for people to > review and point out errors right from the start. > > Currently I only verified that it compiles. > > ChangeLog: > implement overlapped recv(), much like overlapped IO in > files/file.c. > make WS2_32 WSARecvFrom() the "working" function, > all others are wrappers only. > implement WSAGetOverlappedResult(). > > NOTE: My patches submitted yesterday and today (16/01) to wine-patches > are necessary for this one to work. CVS base version is 2002-01-15. > > Martin > > -- Just to add insult to injury, this letter is by juno version 4 using winsocks, this patch and the 3 others mentioned above. Had to use patch -l again. It doesn't constitute a test for asynchronous winsocks, but at least the patches don't break my mail apps. Maybe. Lawson

1 1

RE: What are you really aiming to do with winetest?
by Patrik Stridvall 16 Jan '02

16 Jan '02

> Patrik Stridvall <ps(a)leissner.se> writes: > > > Perhaps you remember me wanting to extend the .spec files > > with information whether a ptr/str was [in], [out], [in/out] > > > > In Perl all string, like in C, are read/write, so I think > > we can live without it. > > > > But return type would be nice to have in the .spec files. > > We discussed this before; I agree it would be nice to have a lot more > information like in/out, return values, more detailed types, etc. But > I don't think the spec file is the right place for that. I'd like the > spec to remain simple (and in fact to even be simplified) and to > contain only the minimal info needed to generate a correct dll. Yes, I remember. I just pointed out the possibillity, in case you had changed your mind. > All > the rest that's used for debug/testing should be moved somewhere else, > preferably directly into the code. So what you basicly want is something like: my %return_type_exceptions; $return_type_exceptions{"foo"} = { Bar => "str", Baz => "ptr" }; $return_type_exceptions{"bar"} = { Foo => "str" }; A file in this format could quite easily be generated by an appropriate script as well.

2 1

RE: What are you really aiming to do with winetest?
by Patrik Stridvall 16 Jan '02

16 Jan '02

> Patrik Stridvall <ps(a)leissner.se> writes: > > > It would be nice if you commented on what you > > think about my spec2pm script for automatically > > generating Perl modules for calling the Windows API. > > Sure; I was looking into integrating it, but found some problems. > I agree generating modules automatically is a good idea; the main > problem right now is that we cannot get the return type of the > functions, and this breaks functions returning a string. Yes, that is true. But it was better than nothing. Many (most?) functions, like strcpy, returns a pointer returns a pointer to one of the arguments anyway so there is little need to actually access it in the test. But of course it should be solved. I see two way of solving this. 1. Extend the spec files to include this information. 2. Have an exception table like the one in make_symbols Fortunately winetest uses Perl, not Python. If we did we would have an additional problem, namely that strings in Python are read-only and passing it as an [out] or [in/out] string would break Python semantics. Perhaps you remember me wanting to extend the .spec files with information whether a ptr/str was [in], [out], [in/out] In Perl all string, like in C, are read/write, so I think we can live without it. But return type would be nice to have in the .spec files. I think I can quite easily can adapt winapi_fixup to do this automatically for all spec files if you wish. You have to decide on the syntax though. > > Also, I'm not sure that you are trying to do: > > The files generated by make_symbols are quite useless, > > they just contain a lot of LOCAL variables. > > They seem to work just fine for me, but I'm no Perl expert, so if you > think your approach is better I'll do it that way. Hmm. I guess that is because you usually write Perl application without "use strict". IIRC variables defaults to global without it and to _local_ with it. In any case, my test with "use strict" didn't work. Anyway, my way is the offical way that is recommended in the Perl documentation and work both with and without "use strict". As a special bonus you can now do things like: use winerror qw(ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED); without having to, like C, include everything.

2 1

Re: C testing framewok. Updated. SystemParametersInfo unit test.
by Andriy Palamarchuk 16 Jan '02

16 Jan '02

Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Andriy Palamarchuk <apa3a(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >>Can you suggest how to implement these switches - as >>command-line arguments or environment variables? >> > > Environment variables are better. I did that already in the perl > framework, look at the runtest script for the variables I'm using. You > probably want to do things the same way so that it's easier to mix > Perl and C tests. Looked at the runtest script. Defined processing of environment variables WINETEST_DEBUG and WINETEST_DIE_ON_FAILURE. As we discussed before we can define platform at runtime, so do we really need the WINETEST_PLATFORM switch? This is one more thing to break. Somebody will eventually mess with the switch when they run the test application manually. Automatic platform definition is pretty reliable. Attached new version of the library. > I don't have a die on failure flag though, but I > don't think this is really necessary. It is not really necessary, only nice thing to have :-) I was thinking about situations when we need to run big batch of tests on unfamiliar platform - e.g. on untested version of Windows or move tests between Win32 implementation. In these situations we are interested to see all possible failures to see amount of work needed to fix them. On other hand we'd like to see only 1 failure on testing regressions. I'm going to leave the option for now. Andriy Palamarchuk __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

2 3

The 4th Coming : Mmsystem Question
by Sylvain Petreolle 16 Jan '02

16 Jan '02

Hi, Using The 4th Coming game (directx game), wine crashes (no debugger is launched) after displaying following some error messages : (game is at http://t4cweb.aliens.com/download/T4csetup.exe) you can use the following game account : T4CWineUser pass: test4U err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x59c150 "?" wait timed out, retrying (60 sec) fs=044f err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x59c150 "?" wait timed out, retrying (60 sec) fs=043f err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x59c150 "?" wait timed out, retrying (60 sec) fs=008f err:mmsys:MULTIMEDIA_GetIData IData not found for pid=0806b920. Suicide !!! (displayed 4 times) ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Courrier : http://courrier.yahoo.fr

1 0

Re: async immediate completion - now tested
by l_whitney＠juno.com 16 Jan '02

16 Jan '02

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 08:06:22PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote: > > PATCH: async-immediate.diff > > This patch uses a more elegant and (IMO) more wine-ish method to check for > possible immediate completion of asynchronous IO requests in ReadFile() and > WriteFile(). > If you get this, async-struct and async-immediate don't harm the 16 bit app. Just making sure I tested exactly what is being proposed. Lawson ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

2 1

Re: Listview Unicodification (take 3) (fwd)
by Gerard Patel 16 Jan '02

16 Jan '02

At 01:58 PM 1/15/02 -0500, you wrote: >[once again, I attached the patch by mistake, and the mail did not go >through...oh well, that happens if you don't sleep at night:) ] I think that by zipping the patch it should be below 64K and be fine. >Here is the latest version of the Unicode ListView control: >http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~dimi/listview-unicode-3.diff Better - all columns have something now - but only the first character. This fixes it : @@ -5075,7 +5076,14 @@ else if (lpLVItem->mask & LVIF_TEXT) { if (internal) lpLVItem->pszText = *ppszText; - else textcpynT(lpLVItem->pszText, *ppszText, lpLVItem->cchTextMax, isW); + else + { + if (isW) + textcpynT(lpLVItem->pszText, *ppszText, lpLVItem->cchTextMax, isW); + else + WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP,0,*ppszText,-1,lpLVItem->pszText, + lpLVItem->cchTextMax,NULL,NULL); + } } if (lpLVItem->iSubItem == 0) I'll let you turn into something correct since it's now more than 2 in the morning and I need some sleep even if you don't. Gerard

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel