On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 7:11 PM Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com wrote:
On 10/31/21 6:34 PM, David Kahurani wrote:
Signed-off-by: David Kahurani k.kahurani@gmail.com
include/commctrl.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/commctrl.h b/include/commctrl.h index 41abceb..d67f5f7 100644 --- a/include/commctrl.h +++ b/include/commctrl.h @@ -3939,8 +3939,8 @@ typedef struct tagLVITEMINDEX (INT)SNDMSGW((hwnd),LVM_SETITEMW,0,(LPARAM)(const LVITEMW *)(pitem)) #define ListView_SetItem WINELIB_NAME_AW(ListView_SetItem) #define ListView_SetItemState(hwnd,i,data,dataMask) \ -{ LVITEM _LVi; _LVi.state = data; _LVi.stateMask = dataMask;\
- SNDMSG(hwnd, LVM_SETITEMSTATE, (WPARAM)(UINT)i, (LPARAM)
(LPLVITEM)&_LVi);}
+{ LVITEMW _LVi; _LVi.state = data; _LVi.stateMask = dataMask;\
- SNDMSGW(hwnd, LVM_SETITEMSTATE, (WPARAM)(UINT)i, (LPARAM)
(LPLVITEMW)&_LVi);}
#define ListView_GetItemState(hwnd,i,mask) \
(UINT)SNDMSG((hwnd),LVM_GETITEMSTATE,(WPARAM)(UINT)(i),(LPARAM)(UINT)(mask))
#define ListView_SetCheckState(hwndLV, i, bCheck) \
This doesn't match what SDK does.
Are you saying there is some other magic beyond what is already in this
macro or a difference in width(s) used?