Re: What macOS SDK is being tested against on gitlab?

[Dean Greer]

Hi Alexandre,
> At this point I don't think we care about testing i386 builds for

macOS. We should soon have a way of building the 32-bit PE dlls as part
of the 64-bit build, which should be the default going forward.

Was this implementation confirmed to also work on legacy macOS versions
that still natively support 32Bit?

More of a concern is recent macOS SDKs are marking functions as
depreciated, when those get swapped out with the newer version (usually
just renamed), if the old name isn’t mapped building against older SDKs
will be broken.

Keeping wine(64) buildable against MacOSX10.13.SDK would be the minimum for
comparability's sake, still being able to build against MacOSX10.11 (or
MacOSX10.10.SDK final revision) would be more ideal at least being
buildable against 10.13 would be required to still support the 32Bit wine
loader.

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:43 AM Alexandre Julliard 
wrote:
> Dean Greer  writes:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> > > Yes, it's a dedicated Mac Mini that we have setup for that purpose,
> >
> > currently running macOS 12.5.1.  I installed a number of Homebrew
> > packages that are necessary for building Wine. If there are specific
> > queries you'd like me to run on that box I'd be happy to.
> >
> > The minimum packages would be;
> >       # build deps
> >       brew install  bison \
> >                           pkg-config \
> >                           mingw-w64
> >
> >       # runtime deps
> >       brew install  freetype \
> >                           gphoto2 \
> >                           gst-plugins-base \
> >                           krb5 \
> >                           mingw-w64 \
> >                           molten-vk \
> >                           sdl2
> >
> >       # casks
> >       brew install --cask xquartz
> >
> > PATH would need to be appended with $(brew --prefix krb5)/bin
> >
> > A copy of MacOSX10.13.sdk from Xcode9.3 (or later version of Xcode9)
>
> placed into /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/ then the testbot
> could also test compiling i386 wine.
> > configure/make wine64 then set the following before running configure
>
> for i386;
> > export
>
> SDKROOT="/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX10.13.sdk"
> > export
>
> PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR="/opt/X11/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/X11/share/pkgconfig"
> > That would at least cover the basics for an i386 build without needing a
>
> legacy macOS runner
>
> At this point I don't think we care about testing i386 builds for
> macOS. We should soon have a way of building the 32-bit PE dlls as part
> of the 64-bit build, which should be the default going forward.
>
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
> [e-mail]