Imho we should keep it like this because it's easier to compare against the Windows IDLs. I mean we also add a bunch of stuff which basically has no effect but keeps similarity to the original sources, in case MS adds a use to that. Plus, issues with the namespaces could arise in the future. (Hope that makes sense.)
Bernhard
Rémi Bernon rbernon@codeweavers.com schrieb am Di., 1. März 2022, 18:46:
On 3/1/22 18:34, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
On 3/1/22 10:42, Rémi Bernon wrote:
From: Bernhard Kölbl besentv@gmail.com
And its dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kölbl besentv@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rémi Bernon rbernon@codeweavers.com
v2: Minor alignment tweaking, though how long can these lines be, oof...
Could we omit the fully qualified namespace?
Not for everything, only to reference things in the same namespace.
Although it may seem a good idea, and I initially thought as much, there's a lot of cross-namespace references, and I find that it makes things less consistent and less readable overall.
-- Rémi Bernon rbernon@codeweavers.com