* On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Hiji wrote:
--- Saulius Krasuckas [email protected] wrote:
a, header of its first section refers to "sysparams.c" and "dlls/user/sysparams.c", which makes patcher to not find needed file (dlls/user/tests/sysparams.c).
b, first hunk of the second section (dlls/user/sysparams.c) is already in the tree, so it fails too.
Ok, I had applied it to the July release, but if some changes are already in the tree, then that's good news.
Not very good, as the mentioned change is only cosmetic.
Vitaly, any thoughts on this?
If Vitaly is busy and won't object, I can resync his changes to the current CVS and send a patch from his name.