This is part two of the results.....
Tom
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:13:57PM -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
This is part two of the results.....
These things should be nicely formatted and posted on the Wiki: wiki.winehq.org
This way we can keep track of such results, see how we (hopefully) improve in time.
On 5/1/05, Dimitrie O. Paun dpaun@rogers.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:13:57PM -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
This is part two of the results.....
These things should be nicely formatted and posted on the Wiki: wiki.winehq.org
This way we can keep track of such results, see how we (hopefully) improve in time.
Thanks Dimi, this sounds like a wonderful idea. If other people have run different benchmarks and have results on the same hardware/setup we could add there results as well. If anyone wants me to run a certain benchmark just let me know and ill be more than glad to do it. I have run Pov-Ray in the past if anyone is interested in this bench ill re-install it and run it again.
Cheers,
Tom
-- Dimi.
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:31:59PM -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
I have run Pov-Ray in the past if anyone is interested in this bench ill re-install it and run it again.
If you can do it, it may prove useful.
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:31:59PM -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
I have run Pov-Ray in the past if anyone is interested in this bench ill re-install it and run it again.
If you can do it, it may prove useful.
povray is cpubound, so should not be a large difference.
//Jakob
On 5/2/05, Jakob Eriksson jakov@vmlinux.org wrote:
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
If you can do it, it may prove useful.
povray is cpubound, so should not be a large difference.
//Jakob
Well only one way to find out isn't it? Ive got Pov-Ray installed and running in current wine, ill install it under XP later today or tomorrow and see if there is any difference.
Cheers,
Tom
-
Dimitrie O. Paun -
Jakob Eriksson -
Tom Wickline