-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Martell,
Looks pretty good, you missed two things:
Am 2015-02-12 um 20:34 schrieb Martell Malone:
+interface IDXGIOutputDuplication : IDXGIObject {
{ placement.
[in, out] UINT *_countmode,
[in, out] UINT *mode_count;
After that go ahead and resubmit patches 1-3. Again I recommend to have a look at git send-email. It's quite simple: What it essentially comes down to is adding this to wine_src/.git/config:
[sendemail] from = Martell Malone martellmalone@gmail.com to = wine-patches wine-patches@winehq.org smtpserver = smtp.googlemail.com chainreplyto = false thread = false smtpencryption = tls smtpuser = martellmalone@gmail.com suppresscc = self
The password was in my case automagically managed by the KDE keychain.
Then you just do "git send-email origin". I recommend a sanity check with --dry-run first. Feels almost like pushing :-) .
Okay I'll sent them in as a group of 3 and send the second 3 separately. I'll try send-email now
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Martell,
Looks pretty good, you missed two things:
Am 2015-02-12 um 20:34 schrieb Martell Malone:
+interface IDXGIOutputDuplication : IDXGIObject {
{ placement.
[in, out] UINT *_countmode,
[in, out] UINT *mode_count;
After that go ahead and resubmit patches 1-3. Again I recommend to have a look at git send-email. It's quite simple: What it essentially comes down to is adding this to wine_src/.git/config:
[sendemail] from = Martell Malone martellmalone@gmail.com to = wine-patches wine-patches@winehq.org smtpserver = smtp.googlemail.com chainreplyto = false thread = false smtpencryption = tls smtpuser = martellmalone@gmail.com suppresscc = self
The password was in my case automagically managed by the KDE keychain.
Then you just do "git send-email origin". I recommend a sanity check with --dry-run first. Feels almost like pushing :-) .
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU3bobAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwCO4P/RlJWBhdZlgs2P8uYZosElTi ofQ2gQNX3Qo53vqwVgtNsmoFyAUHcqUX5euoACeDwjoGpOIe0cJ98ON2sJHADRqa nUPNjPrh/Xo/5WYhQs04hWGRbaFQTCgS+gjuld2ePqIgnAtl880G8GCptD0elcX2 blwa5nPOcxjzaqWX/BB159oioyfWy/IFC5B55Tb7WshSxpkSwgvWkIQsaO2ttF4B 3reG4z1xvgNJZfNH2MzND+d3EJrIq2iydr9dAS4ph1biEbSnlisFR1PwlVFXI7XT CGCmJD7eSM5hU3nRFWB8stEUSumwm8IPQXpcN8PSdzjcWwXuJ1lk6t4t2IlPIuET knXI4D+4XgduVKjBGDxp75fRDL6RmwaRckTnuCLUiCVDcr+bIPHuC1FKFpGxB4Vu q8FZ4wuo4vTegZ9niwi5FPZxc86zLvh3R1qv8mugLJPGbdl+6HYz6aZVtQRXewAe nDZg5nE/DxVrzFF/Ehg9gGHtmwkQeNpxbGK+vsv+qU1sqaod7+FQeTDkfCcs/Ola /7OIdJctBmjpPUGVamVTPUlrRwVNVSboZjDgwN32uBJ/opRFR331HreGL3Aj5UZ1 1EgCcv3tKC8YgiXF7YCrft8EtZFYu/PyZZm0KSjucpGbyviPf03pfNfaj5zPrlMv k1sPLynBjlhOiOO1HRI8 =3BtO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Wait you want me to change from [in, out] UINT *_countmode, to [in, out] UINT *mode_count;
Isn't that what you asked me not todo last time ?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Martell Malone martellmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Okay I'll sent them in as a group of 3 and send the second 3 separately. I'll try send-email now
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Dösinger < stefandoesinger@gmail.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Martell,
Looks pretty good, you missed two things:
Am 2015-02-12 um 20:34 schrieb Martell Malone:
+interface IDXGIOutputDuplication : IDXGIObject {
{ placement.
[in, out] UINT *_countmode,
[in, out] UINT *mode_count;
After that go ahead and resubmit patches 1-3. Again I recommend to have a look at git send-email. It's quite simple: What it essentially comes down to is adding this to wine_src/.git/config:
[sendemail] from = Martell Malone martellmalone@gmail.com to = wine-patches wine-patches@winehq.org smtpserver = smtp.googlemail.com chainreplyto = false thread = false smtpencryption = tls smtpuser = martellmalone@gmail.com suppresscc = self
The password was in my case automagically managed by the KDE keychain.
Then you just do "git send-email origin". I recommend a sanity check with --dry-run first. Feels almost like pushing :-) .
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU3bobAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwCO4P/RlJWBhdZlgs2P8uYZosElTi ofQ2gQNX3Qo53vqwVgtNsmoFyAUHcqUX5euoACeDwjoGpOIe0cJ98ON2sJHADRqa nUPNjPrh/Xo/5WYhQs04hWGRbaFQTCgS+gjuld2ePqIgnAtl880G8GCptD0elcX2 blwa5nPOcxjzaqWX/BB159oioyfWy/IFC5B55Tb7WshSxpkSwgvWkIQsaO2ttF4B 3reG4z1xvgNJZfNH2MzND+d3EJrIq2iydr9dAS4ph1biEbSnlisFR1PwlVFXI7XT CGCmJD7eSM5hU3nRFWB8stEUSumwm8IPQXpcN8PSdzjcWwXuJ1lk6t4t2IlPIuET knXI4D+4XgduVKjBGDxp75fRDL6RmwaRckTnuCLUiCVDcr+bIPHuC1FKFpGxB4Vu q8FZ4wuo4vTegZ9niwi5FPZxc86zLvh3R1qv8mugLJPGbdl+6HYz6aZVtQRXewAe nDZg5nE/DxVrzFF/Ehg9gGHtmwkQeNpxbGK+vsv+qU1sqaod7+FQeTDkfCcs/Ola /7OIdJctBmjpPUGVamVTPUlrRwVNVSboZjDgwN32uBJ/opRFR331HreGL3Aj5UZ1 1EgCcv3tKC8YgiXF7YCrft8EtZFYu/PyZZm0KSjucpGbyviPf03pfNfaj5zPrlMv k1sPLynBjlhOiOO1HRI8 =3BtO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 2015-02-13 um 13:33 schrieb Martell Malone:
Wait you want me to change from [in, out] UINT *_countmode, to [in, out] UINT *mode_count;
Correct.
Isn't that what you asked me not todo last time ?
What I pointed out last time is that you had xxx_count in some places and count_xxx in others. I asked you to consistently use names in the form of xxx_count.
What I pointed out last time is that you had xxx_count in some places and count_xxx in others. I asked you to consistently use names in the form of xxx_count.
Checking back over my emails it was henri who said that he wanted it in the form _count
- I prefer the order of things to be macros/constants, enums,
structs, interfaces, functions instead of having those interleaved through the header.
- "FLOAT" -> "float", "LPCWSTR" -> "const WCHAR *"
- "num_*" -> "*_count"
It's hard to keep track of what to do :(
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger@gmail.com
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 2015-02-13 um 13:33 schrieb Martell Malone:
Wait you want me to change from [in, out] UINT *_countmode, to [in, out] UINT *mode_count;
Correct.
Isn't that what you asked me not todo last time ?
What I pointed out last time is that you had xxx_count in some places and count_xxx in others. I asked you to consistently use names in the form of xxx_count. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU3fEVAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMw6OMQAJCwji4sNP/g+8zlpPHmADDW 87rM+ORSskagtHyfAfhhnchwTarzxfYLUEPP6AfeGox7lzQ41n7axh7PoBjWRsK0 8Nzlo0X2o6hvID0NsD9uYnLQwn1Z7I9iLhJujEEB4wBk9oo34ZKStU2GqyeNQplO D5t+0sWGycEZKiQFIT/Nu9gv2WWq+096LaaxniulYU+DOzp/pCr62y3kiP68PpVO 8GXR13F4hDOf6gRbtaN6GVR/ZcixkhHikoPbxLtnTdbicWcuaofySDkNQLDMF6yS qP7pDwkQM2MyZLQR93r3W+Rgu33o/mt8vpG1Y4SmcS/flRY3VzSxNY36kriubuCQ rchcFq9xWtJ0nz6ycyeGNormnsHXu6ZWLr6C66iDZla24N/iIljEh53r7ggAEM9I pq4ENHMgu4Z/R1yN8c3Q7jdiN8Q5Y0/2rXeln8qLzWFu8876OX2+88HNcTr7qRU0 x0AZhoxyyPxXmyDpckAZhMuiXsMzVySLFOm6osGH6EZWP84S0+ZMNVtKzOtd1irQ 3+VWUl3hu1oTiFk+V5q6Si1g/Ih+Zl7WQXqqvzuHoTmhFZiwrAAfcLXTOUkwuvGq tw/r3pEcYKhYU2EpC5mNS03lsywtrDX+TNG8Sa7ztmDQgCb6NUdX2lAVBvP7PLvt jcBV5ZLAhwhPiMuRpGpd =tmI4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 2015-02-13 um 13:46 schrieb Martell Malone:
What I pointed out last time is that you had xxx_count in some places and count_xxx in others. I asked you to consistently use names in the form of xxx_count.
Checking back over my emails it was henri who said that he wanted it in the form _count
With *_count he meant the same as I mean with xxx_count. E.g. mode_count, level_count, etc. The * in this case is not a C pointer but supposed to be a wildcard.
Ahh I see. Thanks for clearing that up :)
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger@gmail.com
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 2015-02-13 um 13:46 schrieb Martell Malone:
What I pointed out last time is that you had xxx_count in some places and count_xxx in others. I asked you to consistently use names in the form of xxx_count.
Checking back over my emails it was henri who said that he wanted it in the form _count
With *_count he meant the same as I mean with xxx_count. E.g. mode_count, level_count, etc. The * in this case is not a C pointer but supposed to be a wildcard. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU3fOhAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwUkwP+gJI4C+K53BLKGc6kRKZ5CzR E1IfqRtBcsp6132ZRgXVhDAGRFvVwPa5N4WRt5xraSQqK3pS5wqY5cPoeutAk77J akT86Z8MH1nPnvdARv3Gpy/GWQe/NXB76OXKd1aErYvM2HoFGFRxs5dhH07NcjVd gkXJZLS40ZrRPSqOXvdtpqXpV1e3A4iBiSb8xrNibLahl6tY7qlh5e8iZ9Be1nfe 9KdjbmU9WZgSHnS8uymCtY3qdRu7ZLw+Flc0CJarCsZw75Ja8ykUlalBtbgO4P+M tmO2zjizU4Nkb80kI9nq1bWBBcQOk5F04geOMZ00qM3GrZ1z4c5Jm9GSeM6Q0J5Q B0RalaKqKGFjD3szXs4knt/1RL5fI5loQsn+K3GbJ7qWw98tJnOcf/PeEqhchC+p Mrnsu7OEizDslUCX5+EMAmeOhvxqcqHDkUjOW4FoFg3/sAsjH1pg/c+dApWYcOb4 dsK0MeGbB3PvHLSM0uZfjpSCelpu5bjRlYC7ZJ6gGtrRQX92KxZqP85Jz1hT4O03 SMQfpJCjP1ztKWIgNXXyBR7tskv3gtd0WVfkUAb9M+D3Q53WvkE3wNVkoe5/vsaF tKHBipjDd51bSOS4v5QOdahUW8BLk2BrC4KUk77Dm28E+1RNO3XR9Lv/gWGqk+qF 3+OtM2ntfDfyhr+lGx83 =JTsL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----