advapi32: add stub for AddAuditAccessObjectAce

[Louis Lenders]

> Also I think it's better to do a little bit more and forward them to
> ntdll Rtl* calls, like some existing calls already do, it's safe to
> assume prototype are the same between the two.

Hi Nicolai, RtlAddAuditAccessObjectAce and other are still not
implemented in ntdll (and ntdll.spec)

Am i right that you suggest to write the stubs for Rtl* in ntdll, and
then forward advapi32 calls to
Rtl* functions?

Regards

Louis

[Nikolay Sivov]

On Friday, 19 February 2016, Louis Lenders 
wrote:
> > Also I think it's better to do a little bit more and forward them to
> > ntdll Rtl* calls, like some existing calls already do, it's safe to
> > assume prototype are the same between the two.
>
> Hi Nicolai, RtlAddAuditAccessObjectAce and other are still not implemented in ntdll (and ntdll.spec)
>
> Am i right that you suggest to write the stubs for Rtl* in ntdll, and then forward advapi32 calls to
> Rtl* functions?
>
> Yes, same way existing AddAudit* functions do.
> Regards
>
> Louis