http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|When trying to run Matlab 6 |When trying to run Matlab 6
|I get BadWindow .. |it gets to the logo screen
| |and just stops
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2007-16-03 08:39 -------
Horacio, can you please test this under current wine version and report back if
the issue you were experiencing still occurs?
David, if you still monitor wine bugs, could you please check your program under
current wine and let us know if the issue still occurs? If so, please file a
new bug for it, as this bug no longer gives the symptom of badwindow.
Changing summary to accurately reflect the most current conditions posted to the
bug, since the original report was from a wine version that was not current at
the time of reporting.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1240
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2007-16-03 08:30 -------
No response, but it appears that nullsoft installers are working properly, as
when I installed winamp yesterday I did not see anything out of place.
Resolving fixed for now, but not closing, if anyone sees any problems, feel free
to reopen.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1236
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2007-16-03 08:26 -------
Just pinging, no response needed as I am sure you developers are going to work
on this *some* day :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2007-16-03 08:24 -------
well it's failing to change to 16bpp. After the last post, Ivan did you happen
to try X in 16bpp again to see if the issue still occurs there?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2007-16-03 08:00 -------
Sorry James, that was an oversight on my part.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7467
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2007-16-03 07:59 -------
| Wine is a bit chattier about mismatched OLE init/uninit reference count -
| hence the error message.
I'd still would like to write a test for this. Should be pretty easy enough.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Thank you for answer but what then ? It shouldn't cause
GLXBadDrawable but it happens.
Any ideas ?
Best regards
Shadow
Dnia piątek, 16 marca 2007, napisałeś:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7696
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at 2007-16-03 07:26 -------
> I think the FIXME is incorrect. *ppZStencilSurface == NULL is a valid
> condition if there is no depth stencil surface attached. It should not cause
> the GLXBadDrawable error you are seeing
>
>
--
//There is no light without a Shadow//
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7696
------- Additional Comments From stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at 2007-16-03 07:26 -------
I think the FIXME is incorrect. *ppZStencilSurface == NULL is a valid
condition if there is no depth stencil surface attached. It should not cause
the GLXBadDrawable error you are seeing
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7685
------- Additional Comments From zthg4821(a)gmail.com 2007-16-03 07:01 -------
It does appear MTU values are at least partially implicated in the behavioral
discrepancy between local and remote web interface sessions.
On the box that's running eMule/Wine the default MTU setting of the lo interface
is 16436, and at that setting during a local web interface session only a couple
of the image transfers are hanging on the page that gets served after a
successful login, as I reported earlier.
Reducing lo's MTU to 1500 does indeed make local web interface sessions worse,
resulting in similar, but not identical behavior to remote sessions (eth0's MTU
is 1500). That is, unlike remote sessions I can still successfully login, but
the session then hangs on the page that gets served next, and only about 1/3 of
the page's content loads--much less than when MTU is 16436 on lo.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
------- Additional Comments From dmitry(a)codeweavers.com 2007-16-03 06:52 -------
The patch has been committed. Please re-test and close if appropriate.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.