http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
Summary: RenderMonkey 1.82 cannot create any kind of rendering
context
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.24
Platform: PC-x86-64
URL: http://developer.amd.com/Downloads/RenderMonkey.2008-1
2-17-v1.82.322.msi
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: roothorick(a)new.rr.com
Summary pretty much says it all. Trying to do much of anything produces any of
a variety of errors:
* Adding a DirectX effect to the workspace nets a "Unable to create a DirectX 9
HAL device" dialog and a black preview window with "ERROR: Invalid /
Unsupported rendering device." at the top.
* Adding an OpenGL ES effect to the workspace just gets the "ERROR: Invalid /
Unsupported rendering device" message.
* Adding a regular OpenGL effect just plain crashes the app.
I figured a tool like this would be useful in troubleshooting shader-related
Wine bugs. So much for that idea.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19095
Summary: PE explorer shows an access violation when started
under AutoHotKey
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.24
Platform: PC-x86-64
URL: http://www.heaventools.com/download/pexsetup.exe
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=22045)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22045)
test
Installation went fine but running doesn't. When running 'normally', without
AHK, works fine.
Attached is the test + it's helper function files, along with autohotkey.exe
Extract and run with 'wine autohotkey.exe pex.ahk'. Wait a few seconds until
the PE Explorer window shows up, and let it sit. Access violation should appear
shortly.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19114
Summary: Need for speed 3 - wrong behavior of force feedback
wheel
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.24
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: directx-dinput
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: wylda(a)volny.cz
Hi,
during playing of Need for speed 3 (NFS):
1. I'm missing some force feedback effects like engine's rumble or effects when
driving on dust/grass/wooden bridge
2. There is wrong behavior when hitting right or left side of car, the wheel's
force is always to the left
3. Console is flooded all the time by message:
fixme:dinput:LinuxInputEffectImpl_Download Could not upload effect. Assuming a
disconnected device 47 "Invalid argument".
4. In Menu "Control" there is a console message:
fixme:dinput:joy_polldev joystick cannot handle type 21 event (code 96)
Comparison made to MS's WinXP, which works flawlessly.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9221
Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |wylda(a)volny.cz
--- Comment #30 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2009-06-28 16:28:18 ---
*** Bug 19114 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19108
Summary: Counter-Strike crashes with Metacity and Compiz
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.24
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: neptunia(a)mail.ru
Created an attachment (id=22067)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22067)
crash output
Counter-Strike crashes with Metacity and Compiz while under Xfwm4 all is OK.
The crash output is attached.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5941
Peter Rininsland <peter(a)rininsland.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |peter(a)rininsland.de
--- Comment #11 from Peter Rininsland <peter(a)rininsland.de> 2009-06-28 12:11:27 ---
Long time passed since the last entry.
I was very impressed how great Pokerstars works with wine. Almost couldn't
believe it. Having seen such a great work I doubt that this last little bit
should be unsolvable.
I've Wine 1.1.24 under OpenSuse 11.1.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4342
Yuri Khan <yurivkhan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |yurivkhan(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Yuri Khan <yurivkhan(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-28 10:11:13 ---
As of current git state (wine 1.1.24), the PrintDlgExW function only knows how
to return the default values. No code to display a dialog is actually present.
If the flag PD_RETURNDEFAULT is not specified, the function is essentially a
no-op.
This affects pretty much every application that has printing options.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7369
Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |focht(a)gmx.net
--- Comment #9 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-06-27 16:26:24 ---
Hello,
--- quote ---
Confirming. This works fine using only native ole32.dll.
Just before trouble starts there's a call to ole32.CreateDataCache. Guess
something goes wrong there. I'll attach a log
--- quote ---
Yes, its most likely ole32 CreateDataCache() that does something wrong.
--- snip ---
...
0009:Call KERNEL32.LoadLibraryW(0032b880
L"C:\\windows\\system32\\tx14_doc.dll") ret=03043784
0009:trace:loaddll:load_native_dll Loaded
L"C:\\windows\\system32\\tx14_doc.dll" at 0x36d0000: native
0009:Call PE DLL (proc=0x3747a83,module=0x36d0000
L"tx14_doc.dll",reason=PROCESS_ATTACH,res=(nil))
...
0009:Ret PE DLL (proc=0x3747a83,module=0x36d0000
L"tx14_doc.dll",reason=PROCESS_ATTACH,res=(nil)) retval=1
...
0009:Call ole32.CreateDataCache(00000000,0375a6b0,0375a6c0,0032b1ec)
ret=0370c19f
0009:trace:ole:CreateDataCache ({00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}, (nil),
{00000000-0000-0000-c000-000000000046}, 0x32b1ec)
...
0009:Ret ole32.CreateDataCache() retval=00000000 ret=0370c19f
0009:trace:seh:raise_exception code=c0000005 flags=0 addr=(nil) ip=00000000
tid=0009
0009:trace:seh:raise_exception info[0]=00000000
0009:trace:seh:raise_exception info[1]=00000000
0009:trace:seh:raise_exception eax=00000000 ebx=03890168 ecx=75096484
edx=0032b1b0 esi=00000020 edi=00000000
0009:trace:seh:raise_exception ebp=0032b1ac esp=0032b0d4 cs=0023 ds=002b
es=002b fs=0063 gs=006b flags=00010246
0009:trace:seh:call_vectored_handlers calling handler at 0x706fab65
code=c0000005 flags=0
0009:trace:seh:call_vectored_handlers handler at 0x706fab65 returned 0
0009:trace:seh:call_vectored_handlers calling handler at 0x7b83ffd9
code=c0000005 flags=0
0009:trace:seh:call_vectored_handlers handler at 0x7b83ffd9 returned 0
0009:trace:seh:call_stack_handlers calling handler at 0x3754568 code=c0000005
flags=0
...
0009:trace:msgbox:MSGBOX_OnInit L"20058 : Unexpected Text Control
error.\n(1-1d09)\r\n-2146808230\r\ntx4ole14"
...
--- snip ---
-> CreateDataCache(NULL, &CLSID_NULL, &IID_IUnknown, (LPVOID *)&pUnknown);
The app crashes while trying to call vtable member on returned interface.
Reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms688476.aspx
Relevant Wine code:
--- snip dlls/ole32/datacache.c ---
static HRESULT WINAPI DataCache_NDIUnknown_QueryInterface(
IUnknown* iface,
REFIID riid,
void** ppvObject)
{
DataCache *this = impl_from_NDIUnknown(iface);
...
/*
* Compare the riid with the interface IDs implemented by this object.
*/
if (memcmp(&IID_IUnknown, riid, sizeof(IID_IUnknown)) == 0)
{
*ppvObject = iface;
}
...
}
...
HRESULT WINAPI CreateDataCache(
LPUNKNOWN pUnkOuter,
REFCLSID rclsid,
REFIID riid,
LPVOID* ppvObj)
{
...
/*
* Make sure it supports the interface required by the caller.
*/
hr = IUnknown_QueryInterface((IUnknown*)&(newCache->lpvtblNDIUnknown), riid,
ppvObj);
/*
* Release the reference obtained in the constructor. If
* the QueryInterface was unsuccessful, it will free the class.
*/
IUnknown_Release((IUnknown*)&(newCache->lpvtblNDIUnknown));
return hr;
}
...
static const IUnknownVtbl DataCache_NDIUnknown_VTable =
{
DataCache_NDIUnknown_QueryInterface,
DataCache_NDIUnknown_AddRef,
DataCache_NDIUnknown_Release
};
--- snip dlls/ole32/datacache.c ---
The app code after call to ole32.CreateDataCache() gives some hints
(annotated):
--- snip tx14_doc.dll ---
PE 3460000- 3504000 Export tx14_doc
-> call to ole32.CreateDataCache()
0x0349c19f: cmpl %edi,%eax
0x0349c1a1: jnl 0x0349c1b5 ; S_OK
0x0349c1a3: xorl %ecx,%ecx
0x0349c1a5: cmpl $-2147024882,%eax
0x0349c1aa: setnz %cl
0x0349c1ad: addl $3,%ecx
0x0349c1b0: call 0x034b8f10
0x0349c1b5: movl 0x40(%ebp),%eax ; ppvObj
0x0349c1b8: movl 0x0(%eax),%ecx ; ole32.DataCache_NDIUnknown_VTable
0x0349c1ba: leal 0x0(%ebp),%edx
0x0349c1bd: pushl %edx
0x0349c1be: pushl $0x10
0x0349c1c0: leal 0x4(%ebp),%edx
0x0349c1c3: pushl %edx
0x0349c1c4: pushl %eax
0x0349c1c5: movl 0xc(%ecx),%eax ; DataCache_NDIUnknown_VTable->fn4
0x0349c1c8: call *%eax ; *boom*
0x0349c1ca: cmpl %edi,%eax
--- snip tx14_doc.dll ---
The first hint is the call of the interface member function.
Vtable offset 0xC basically means the interface must contain at least four
member functions hence this can't be plain IUnknown (DataCache_NDIUnknown).
The next hint are the parameters. Four parameters get pushed before the iface
member call. The last one pushed is actually the implicit iface pThis, so the
interface function takes 3 parameters.
The second parameter can't obviously be a pointer one (0x10).
Looking through interfaces to match the constraints it seems
IOleCache/IOleCache2 is the best bet (IOleCache::Cache Method).
See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms680087.aspx
I tried to return IOleCache2 interface but it didn't work out in the end, it
conflicted with dlls/ole32/defaulthandler.c:DefaultHandler_Construct() which
also passes IID_IUnknown to CreateDataCache() and seems to expect this
DataCache_NDIUnknown (where does this come from, there doesn't seem to be any
documentation on it?).
Regards
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7949
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|unspecified |0.9.35.
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #32 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-27 16:04:48 ---
Fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19101
Summary: Don`t install FineReader 9
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.24
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: patsev.anton(a)gmail.com
Don`t install FineReader 9
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.