http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28129
Summary: The software "Desafio Sebrae" don't work on the wine
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.26
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: marcossr09(a)yahoo.com.br
Created an attachment (id=36042)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36042)
Log error
When running the software "Desafio Sebrae" is installed, but then an error
mensage appears and the software close. In attachmentts is the log of the
error.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5623
--- Comment #34 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> 2011-08-30 21:37:34 CDT ---
Created an attachment (id=36169)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36169)
sample app
This is almost fixed if you use virtual desktop in wine, if not the keys are
not detected if the window focused is not handled by wine (maybe this is
expected).
I created a small test application that queries GetAsyncKeyState for the entire
set of VKeys and count the repetitions of a pressed key or repeated key (this
is the most common way to create non-intrusive keyloggers).
On windows if you open several times main.exe and press a key or mouse button
on any of the windows all samples show the same key and almost the same number
of repetitions.
This sample does not have a window so to test it open winecfg or other
application and open main.exe at least twice on different consoles. Then just
click or press any key while focusing a wine window and all clones of the
main.exe will show the same or very similar results.
Can anyone else, please, test the demo and reproduce the same behavior in a
clean prefix in 1.3.27?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6955
avshap(a)nerdshack.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |avshap(a)nerdshack.com
--- Comment #88 from avshap(a)nerdshack.com 2011-08-30 18:23:47 CDT ---
(In reply to comment #87)
> tried it with 1.3.26, but the outcome is (nearly) the same;
> 1 out of 3 hunks fails to be patched. The source can be configured, but make
> will fail at some point. For some reason, x86 and x64 builds failed with
> different errors.
> and for the sake of completeness, I tested it with 1.3.25 as well, same
> problem.
As I understand it is the result of the fact that starting from version 1.3.25
in wined3d use "state" pointer instead of "stateblock". For example. Function
transworm_world (in file dlls/wined3d/state.c) in 1.3.24:
static void transform_world(DWORD state, struct wined3d_stateblock *stateblock,
struct wined3d_context *context)
and in 1.3.26:
static void transform_world(struct wined3d_context *context, const struct
wined3d_state *state, DWORD state_id)
Naturally, in this case compiler reports an error.
P.S. Sorry for bad English. Not enough practice.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6955
--- Comment #87 from Yuki <cute.dark.sorcerer(a)gmail.com> 2011-08-30 17:53:36 CDT ---
(In reply to comment #86)
> I did not try it yet with 1.3.27 but it works with 1.3.26
tried it with 1.3.26 but same as with 1.3.27:
(In reply to comment #86)
> I did not try it yet with 1.3.27 but it works with 1.3.26
tried it with 1.3.26, but the outcome is (nearly) the same;
1 out of 3 hunks fails to be patched. The source can be configured, but make
will fail at some point. For some reason, x86 and x64 builds failed with
different errors.
and for the sake of completeness, I tested it with 1.3.25 as well, same
problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6955
--- Comment #86 from Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm(a)gmail.com> 2011-08-30 13:19:40 CDT ---
I did not try it yet with 1.3.27 but it works with 1.3.26
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27621
Summary: SDP Downloader: "TTCP: socket connect failed: 10061"
error
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.23
Platform: x86-64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: winsock
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: atalanttore(a)googlemail.com
Hi
I try to use SDP Downloader 2.3.0 [1] on Kubuntu 11.04 x64.
The program GUI is rendered correctly, but starting a download in SDP
Downloader will cause a "TTCP: socket connect failed: 10061" error.
[1] http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=10959
Regards,
E. Atalan
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #97 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2011-08-29 19:06:44 CDT ---
Reported fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
--- Comment #96 from Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> 2011-08-29 19:03:57 CDT ---
It's working for me.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |00cpxxx(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #95 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> 2011-08-29 18:27:15 CDT ---
Despite of several graphic issues I can connect in a clean prefix in 1.3.27.
Dylan said it works too on comment #94, can anyone else retest?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2082
Benjamin Hodgetts <ben(a)xnode.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ben(a)xnode.org
--- Comment #85 from Benjamin Hodgetts <ben(a)xnode.org> 2011-08-29 17:37:15 CDT ---
Just pinging this as it's currently still a problem in 1.3.27.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.